Kreepy Kavanaugh

Republican staff members are talking to unknown people,

whose identities were obtained in an unknown way,

about an incident that they continue to maintain never happened


on a date and in a place that cannot be determined

And they (the Republican men, pretend like they don't understand why Dr. Ford doesn't want to walk into the middle of what they're planning for her?


Joan McCarter
2018/09/20

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...bt-that-investigation-of-Kavanaugh-is-a-farce


200 women put their names on letter supporting Dr. Ford


65 Republican Ladies Against Women


"...just two of the initial 65 women said they’d stand by their statement. Dozens did not respond to the request for comment and two specifically declined to speak again on the record."


https://thinkprogress.org/christine...lassmates-open-letter-kavanaugh-5e01740a6a8b/



But the notion that the Republicans weighing Kavanaugh’s nomination are acting in good faith, or actually open to disqualifying information about the nominee, was undermined Wednesday night when Mike Davis, the judiciary committee’s Chief Counsel for Nominations, tweeted: “Unfazed and Determined. We will confirm Judge Kavanaugh.”


On its face, the tweet combined indifference for the serious allegation of sexual assault brought by Ford with a hashtag commitment to #ConfirmKavanaugh. The tweet caught the notice of this reporter and others:


https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/senate-confirmation-kavanaugh-727281/


Mike Davis
@mrddmia

(blah, blah, blah)

I deleted the tweet

(blah, blah, blah)

10:12 AM · Sep 20, 2018

88 Retweets 413 Likes

Mike Davis
@mrddmia

Chief Counsel for Nominations, United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Chairman

Washington, DC
2,665 Following
2,486 Followers


On one side you have a narrative of an event in a time period of 5 or 7 minutes without corroboration. In the other you have 35 years of perfect behavior butressed by 6 FBI background investigations and the testimony of dozens of people who know and have worked with the Judge. The former being the only questionable anomaly along that entire chronological line.
 
200 women put their names on letter supporting Dr. Ford


what does supporting mean?

:confused:
 
“It was more than obvious to me that she bore the scars of what she had been subjected to."


Rep. Anna Eshoo Explains Why Christine Blasey Ford’s Accusations Stuck With Her
The California lawmaker was the first to hear Blasey’s allegation of sexual assault against Brett Kavanaugh.


SCARS?


So the SKANK HOE! had NO scars from 1985 till 2012:confused::rolleyes:
 
Why don't you look up the Maryland law before posting? They were juveniles at the time if she is telling the truth. She didn't allege a felony assault in her letter. She didn't lose her clothes nor was she penetrated. It's not clear exactly what she is alleging since we haven't seen the letter or heard it from her mouth. She is only alleging from what I've read that she was groped on the outside of her clothes and Kavanaugh has denied it ever happened. Felony sexual assault has a distinct definition under Maryland law. Why don't you look it up.

I did. Looks like a felony to me per 3-307 Maryland Criminal Code based on what has been reported.
 
Jesus Christ... 33%.

Some people have no life.

Which, ironically is greater than the percentage of people that support his appointment and less than the number of people who oppose it. Go fig.
 
Jesus Christ... 33%.

Some people have no life.

Which, ironically is greater than the percentage of people that support his appointment and less than the number of people who oppose it. Go fig.

REPORTED!:mad:
 

Ford has already exploded this one. She has released a statement that she knew them both, that she even visited the guy being disgustingly brought in to this in the hospital once, and she knew the difference between them than and knows the difference between them now.

It's getting to where all of you disgusting Trumpettes and every Republican in Congress should be put on a ship and shoved off the shores of this country.
 
Ford has already exploded this one. She has released a statement that she knew them both, that she even visited the guy being disgustingly brought in to this in the hospital once, and she knew the difference between them than and knows the difference between them now.

It's getting to where all of you disgusting Trumpettes and every Republican in Congress should be put on a ship and shoved off the shores of this country.

You and whose gun-free army?

Your odious side doesn't get to whine about something like this dropping in, given the 11th hour hack job it is deflecting from. (Yes, it's a deflection, and a good one at that.)

A "witness" willing to derail an already completed hearing on a SCOTUS nominee with an anonymous letter, but not willing to promptly give sworn testimony is not in a position to "explode" anything via a second-hand denial.

She "socialized" with them both? According to her other statements, she never saw Kavannaugh before or after the night in question. Speaking of in night question...what night was that again? What year?

It doesn't matter whether she expands her nearly non-existent memory of the alleged event to be "certain" about this. It's a sufficient SODDI possibility.

You can start crying now, if you like.
 
Last edited:
Women are a special class. They are entitled to a level of sensitivity and consideration not afforded men. They are bending over backwards for Ford. Does anybody care about the psychological and emotional impact on Judge Kavanaugh and his family, to be falsely accused? No because he's a man and presumed guilty based on a completely unsubstantiated allegation. This is unfair and it sucks.
 
Kreepy Kavanaugh


Dick Durbin Sent Kavanaugh 2007 Letter About Misleading Senate Testimony. Kavanaugh Lied.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...-Misleading-Senate-Testimony-He-ll-Be-Grilled

Boston said no to Kreepy Kavanaugh

http://www.wbur.org/news/2018/07/10/kavanaugh-nomination-massachusetts-reaction

Arse Weasel Ralph Reed and all of his pals, love this


Faith and Freedom Coalition’s Ralph Reed: Reed called Kavanaugh a justice “in the model of Antonin Scalia.” In an email to supporters, Reed said:


"If Judge Kavanaugh is confirmed, conservatives will have a rock-solid 5-4 majority on the Supreme Court for the first time in generation."

Federalist Society
Heritage Foundation
Family Research Council
Americans United for Life
Operation Rescue
Texas Right to Life
Susan B. Anthony List
(Susan is whirling in her grave)

National Organization for Marriage
Liberty Counsel
Gun Owners of America
American Center for Law & Justice
National Religious Broadcasters


http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/...e-trump-scotus-nomination-of-brett-kavanaugh/

Just think we all could have Hillary and this Lying Piece of Shit in Power!
https://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/bill-clinton-Catsimatidis-daughter.jpg
 
Women are a special class. They are entitled to a level of sensitivity and consideration not afforded men. They are bending over backwards for Ford. Does anybody care about the psychological and emotional impact on Judge Kavanaugh and his family, to be falsely accused? No because he's a man and presumed guilty based on a completely unsubstantiated allegation. This is unfair and it sucks.

https://i.imgur.com/FLGiMbV.jpg

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif
 
It's handy. :cool:

I'm sure it is handy to make sure you don't accidentally consume anything from anyone who does not already agree with you. It sure helps you to stay on point with whatever the current approved talking points are.

Heaven forfend you simply read articles from multiple sources with a discerning eye for objectively reported facts and consciously reject injected bias and opinion.
 
Think you're going to have to bring in a backhoe to shovel that pile of shit.

How so?
You can testify publicly
You can testify privately
You don't have to face the person you are accusing because we don't want you to feel uncomfortable because you're a woman.
You can testify Monday..or not
How much more do you need?
 
Back
Top