Kreepy Kavanaugh

[Aglaopheme]

I guess that means you aren’t going to answer any of my simple question.

 

[Rightguide]

I guess that means you aren’t going to answer any of my simple question.

I answered your question about what the difference is.

 

[BBX50]

they BOTH could be telling the truth*

https://www.themaven.net/theresurgent/contributors/mistaken-identity-1cBKwVqt3EaNk5oXUclEyQ/

mistaken identity


*but CUNTS always lie about shit

 

[BBX50]

I guess that means you aren’t going to answer any of my simple question.

should Ellison be forced to drop out

Booker?

simple question...

 

[BBX50]

here is YOUR "PEER"

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36082/kavanaugh-accusers-classmate-makes-new-claim-then-ryan-saavedra

another LYING CUNT


BTW, the therapist's notes DONT contain any name and has the # of witnesses WRONG

 

[BBX50]

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/19/...on=click&module=Top**0Stories&pgtype=Homepage


Ford’s College Best Friend: She Never Mentioned An Assault Until This Summer


what PEER'S...................ALGO?????????????????

 

[Rightguide]

here is YOUR "PEER"

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36082/kavanaugh-accusers-classmate-makes-new-claim-then-ryan-saavedra

another LYING CUNT


BTW, the therapist's notes DONT contain any name and has the # of witnesses WRONG

Karen Tumulty and her army of feminists will find more like her by Monday.

 

[BBX50]

should Ellison be forced to drop out

Booker?

simple question...

simple question, ALGO

and PUH LEEZE spare us the shit of ITS NOT THE TOPIC OF THE THREAD BS

 

[BBX50]

Karen Tumulty and her army of feminists will find more like her by Monday.

there are TWEETS all over asking for people to come forward


1000% there will be more....LIARS!

 

[BBX50]

A lawyer for the Senate Judiciary Committee confirms that Judge Kavanaugh has been questioned at length in private, “under penalty of perjury and 5 years of imprisonment if he lies.” So lets stop with the BS its a HE SAID-SHE SAID.....cause ONE SIDE says IT NEVER HAPPENED



Two of the men named in the complaint have sent on-the-record letters refuting the accuser’s charges — letters that are subject to the same perjury laws as is testimony. Kavanaugh’s accuser, by contrast, has done none of these things.


To date, only HER side has had felllow CUNTS say something only to say, NEVER MIND.....


To date, she is the only figure within this drama who hasn’t given testimony under oath.

 

[Rightguide]

Looks like Fran Townsend is saying she thinks it's a mistake for Ford to submit to an FBI interview, recalling how FBI 302s provided to the committee were used to brutally cross examine Anita Hill. She thinks it's better for Ford to speak for herself. So there you have the other side of the thinking.

 

[Rightguide]

A lawyer for the Senate Judiciary Committee confirms that Judge Kavanaugh has been questioned at length in private, “under penalty of perjury and 5 years of imprisonment if he lies.” So lets stop with the BS its a HE SAID-SHE SAID.....cause ONE SIDE says IT NEVER HAPPENED



Two of the men named in the complaint have sent on-the-record letters refuting the accuser’s charges — letters that are subject to the same perjury laws as is testimony. Kavanaugh’s accuser, by contrast, has done none of these things.


To date, only HER side has had felllow CUNTS say something only to say, NEVER MIND.....


To date, she is the only figure within this drama who hasn’t given testimony under oath.

ALGO has lost the debate.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

ALGO has lost the debate.

man really? i mean really? lol, you straight bat shit af.

 

[Rightguide]

The NYTs is now saying they were in error when they reported the Mark Judge remembered the incident. They say now he did not remember the incident. They say they were fooled by fake news. So, no witness whatsoever.

 

[KeithD]

The NYTs is now saying they were in error when they reported the Mark Judge remembered the incident. They say now he did not remember the incident. They say they were fooled by fake news. So, no witness whatsoever.

I bet if I checked, the NYT would be saying he claimed he didn't remember, not that he didn't remember. The NYT isn't capable of knowing what he actually remembers and what he doesn't. Nor does what he claims to remember represent what he actually remembers. Get what he says pinned down under oath and then research it. They could start with his book about his wild days at Georgetown Prep.

 

[Rightguide]

I bet if I checked, the NYT would be saying he claimed he didn't remember, not that he didn't remember.

I heard it on the radio so you may be right.

 

[IG_88]

She's kind of a looker. Wondering if there are any nudes out there. Asking for a friend. And myself. Mostly myself.

 

[doowdniw]

She didn't allege a felony level of sexual assault.

I don't know Maryland law, but it sounds like a allegation of attempted aggravated sexual assault of a minor. A felony in most if not all US jurisdictions.

 

[Rightguide]

I don't know Maryland law, but it sounds like a allegation of attempted aggravated sexual assault of a minor. A felony in most if not all US jurisdictions.

Why don't you look up the Maryland law before posting? They were juveniles at the time if she is telling the truth. She didn't allege a felony assault in her letter. She didn't lose her clothes nor was she penetrated. It's not clear exactly what she is alleging since we haven't seen the letter or heard it from her mouth. She is only alleging from what I've read that she was groped on the outside of her clothes and Kavanaugh has denied it ever happened. Felony sexual assault has a distinct definition under Maryland law. Why don't you look it up.

 

[BBX50]

EMPOWERED!


The lying skank HOSE BITCH CUNT "Peer" of the vaunted ALGO....PEERS.....(ALGO LIED, cause there are no PEERS who spoke out, but for this one lying skank HOSE BITCH CUNT "Peer"

Said it was the TALK OF THE SCHOOL.....then when she was contacted by the media, recanted and said she didnt know anything and didnt expect to have to defend her remarks, but she felt EMPOWERED saying what she did


So this, lying skank HOSE BITCH CUNT "Peer" was willing to ruin a MAN with LIES to feel empowered


LOCK

HER

UP

 

[Rightguide]

Does anyone remember when Attorney Debra Katz defended Al Franken with the following:

“He did not do this as a member of the U.S. Senate. He did this in his capacity of someone who was still functioning as an entertainer.”

Will she say that Kavanaugh was functioning as a child instead of a federal judge when he groped Ford, if he in fact did so? Just askin'.

 

[Que]

I bet if I checked, the NYT would be saying he claimed he didn't remember, not that he didn't remember. The NYT isn't capable of knowing what he actually remembers and what he doesn't. Nor does what he claims to remember represent what he actually remembers. Get what he says pinned down under oath and then research it. They could start with his book about his wild days at Georgetown Prep.

Good point. Not only do we have the problem of witness memory degrading over time and the notorious unreliability of eyewitness testimony we now have to worry about the fact that this is simply what Ford claims to remember.

 

[BBX50]

Does anyone remember when Attorney Debra Katz defended Al Franken with the following:

“He did not do this as a member of the U.S. Senate. He did this in his capacity of someone who was still functioning as an entertainer.”

Will she say that Kavanaugh was functioning as a child instead of a federal judge when he groped Ford, if he in fact did so? Just askin'.

except he said it never happened and he doesnt even know her

 

[gotsnowgotslush]

Republican staff members are talking to unknown people,

whose identities were obtained in an unknown way,

about an incident that they continue to maintain never happened


on a date and in a place that cannot be determined

And they (the Republican men, pretend like they don't understand why Dr. Ford doesn't want to walk into the middle of what they're planning for her?


Joan McCarter
2018/09/20

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...bt-that-investigation-of-Kavanaugh-is-a-farce


200 women put their names on letter supporting Dr. Ford


65 Republican Ladies Against Women


"...just two of the initial 65 women said they’d stand by their statement. Dozens did not respond to the request for comment and two specifically declined to speak again on the record."


https://thinkprogress.org/christine...lassmates-open-letter-kavanaugh-5e01740a6a8b/



But the notion that the Republicans weighing Kavanaugh’s nomination are acting in good faith, or actually open to disqualifying information about the nominee, was undermined Wednesday night when Mike Davis, the judiciary committee’s Chief Counsel for Nominations, tweeted: “Unfazed and Determined. We will confirm Judge Kavanaugh.”


On its face, the tweet combined indifference for the serious allegation of sexual assault brought by Ford with a hashtag commitment to #ConfirmKavanaugh. The tweet caught the notice of this reporter and others:


https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/senate-confirmation-kavanaugh-727281/


Mike Davis
@mrddmia

(blah, blah, blah)

I deleted the tweet

(blah, blah, blah)

10:12 AM · Sep 20, 2018

88 Retweets 413 Likes

Mike Davis
@mrddmia

Chief Counsel for Nominations, United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Chairman

Washington, DC
2,665 Following
2,486 Followers

 

[Rightguide]

except he said it never happened and he doesnt even know her

This is true. Katz was also critical of the Paula Jones case:

“Clearly a one-time incident that took place in 10 to 12 minutes, she was not forced to have sex, she left on her own volition, the courts increasingly are finding that that is not enough to create a sexually hostile work environment claim,” Katz said in April 1998, according to a transcript of CBS Evening News.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...duct-allegations-against-clinton-franken.html