Kreepy Kavanaugh

Well, no it doesn't without something further. She apparently can't pinpoint the party time/place either. Or have you seen proof that there was such a party they both were at? If not, it's still in the he said/she said zone. And having had to handle sexual harassment cases before when the conclusion was that the accuser (not always a woman) was using the bias of presumption of the accuser's word being true, I'd have to see more evidence than I've seen here so far. Although I couldn't accept that the word of the other guy present could be assumed not to have bias--and, in this case, political bias--I think we need to hear from him. And from others at the party if the time/place can be pinned down.

I think you're showing a bias in assumption.

Basically, I'm happy I'm not the one who has to act on any of this information. I don't want Kavanaugh to be confirmed but that's based on much more than this issue and I won't cheer if this issue is falsely being used to reach the result I prefer.

I haven’t read anything that says she can’t pinpoint when the party was. You could be correct depending on how many people attended the party.

I don’t think it shows bias at all. I’m saying his denial of even being at the party broadens the amount of people that can place him there, and expose him in a lie. That would be more than he said she said.
 
During his confirmation hearings, Kavanaugh told the Judiciary Committee that he had no knowledge whatsoever of Kozinski’s behavior and was stunned to learn of the misconduct allegations. “When they became public, the first thought I had: No one should be subjected to sexual harassment in the workplace ever, including in the judiciary, especially in the judiciary,” Kavanaugh said under oath during his confirmation hearing, responding to a question from Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii. “When I heard, it was a gut punch. It was a gut punch for me. It was a gut punch for the judiciary. I was shocked, and disappointed, angry, swirl of emotions.”

Hirono asked him to search his records and in a written response, he backed off his certainty, saying only, “I do not remember receiving inappropriate emails of a sexual nature from Judge Kozinski.”

Sanai told The Intercept that at least two federal employees had information to provide the committee about Kavanaugh, including one who spoke directly with Kavanaugh about it. Sanai said that he did not hold Kavanaugh responsible for Kozinski’s behavior, but rather that his claim of ignorance was not credible and could be contradicted by witnesses. Kavanaugh’s credibility has become a central issue in his confirmation, as he has “unequivocally” denied allegations that he sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford when both were in high school.

Apart from interviewing witnesses, Sanai also suggested that the Judiciary Committee “subpoena all intra Court emails and messages between Kavanaugh and Kozinski and all emails to and from Kozinski with links to his website.”

The fact that Kozinski hosted pornography on his website and forced some clerks to view it was one of the exposed behaviors that led to his resignation.

https://theintercept.com/2018/09/17...ssley-and-dianne-feinstein-neither-responded/
 
I just don't care what the guy did in high school. We all did stupid shit in high school.
10 or 20 years ago? I'd care.
40 years ago when still a kid? I'm not holding that shit against anyone. I mean I guess if he was a member of the Young Serial Killers Club or some shit.
Of course I also don't really give a shit who's on the Supreme Court as long as they are qualified.
 
If The Democrats Can't Win Fair, They Plant False Sexual Allegations. The Kavanaugh Accuser Is A Liberal Activist Known For Holding Grudges And Getting Even With Those She Doesn't Like. The Only Witness Says She Is Lying. 65 Women That Know Him Have Come To Kavanaugh's Defense. Disrupting The Proceedings By Screaming Every Few Minutes Didn't Work So The Democrats Are Trying This Now. They Have No Morals Or Moral Compass.

No She Is Not, That Is Utter Bull.
 
I just don't care what the guy did in high school. We all did stupid shit in high school.
10 or 20 years ago? I'd care.
40 years ago when still a kid? I'm not holding that shit against anyone. I mean I guess if he was a member of the Young Serial Killers Club or some shit.
Of course I also don't really give a shit who's on the Supreme Court as long as they are qualified.

I know, right. High school rapists are so cute. :)
 
If The Democrats Can't Win Fair, They Plant False Sexual Allegations. The Kavanaugh Accuser Is A Liberal Activist Known For Holding Grudges And Getting Even With Those She Doesn't Like. The Only Witness Says She Is Lying. 65 Women That Know Him Have Come To Kavanaugh's Defense. Disrupting The Proceedings By Screaming Every Few Minutes Didn't Work So The Democrats Are Trying This Now. They Have No Morals Or Moral Compass.

https://i.imgflip.com/t7g18.jpg

And repugs have the upper hand on morals, huh? Such fine saints!

Once again, teh stoopid is clogging up the air. Hard to breathe in here.
 
Last edited:
I missed it...show me

BTW, the Cunt and LezBeen cunt get their stories straight

https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/17/...ush&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push

What does THAT tell you?

Her letter says nothing about the gender of the people in attendance.

I hadn’t read the letter in it’s entirety yet.

Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as I was headed for a bathroom up a short stair well from the living room. They locked the door and played loud music precluding any successful attempt to yell for help.
Kavanaugh was on top of me while laughing with REDACTED, who periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh. They both laughed as Kavanaugh tried to disrobe me in their highly inebriated state. With Kavanaugh's hand over my mouth I feared he may inadvertently kill me.
From across the room a very drunken REDACTED said mixed words to Kavanaugh ranging from "go for it" to "stop."
At one point when REDACTED jumped onto the bed the weight on me was substantial. The pile toppled, and the two scrapped with each other. After a few attempts to get away, I was able to take this opportune moment to get up and run across to a hallway bathroom. I locked the bathroom door behind me. Both loudly stumbled down the stair well at which point other persons at the house were talking with them. I exited the bathroom, ran outside of the house and went home.
 
Her letter says nothing about the gender of the people in attendance.

I hadn’t read the letter in it’s entirety yet.

Im "disappointed" in you

CUNT said one thing in the letter....LezBeen said another

]
 
Her letter says nothing about the gender of the people in attendance.

I hadn’t read the letter in it’s entirety yet.

Somebody watched "The Accused" with Jodie Foster and worked in "Go For It!" while making up the allegations.:rolleyes:
 
I haven’t read anything that says she can’t pinpoint when the party was. You could be correct depending on how many people attended the party.

I don’t think it shows bias at all. I’m saying his denial of even being at the party broadens the amount of people that can place him there, and expose him in a lie. That would be more than he said she said.

CNN this afternoon reported she hadn't named a time/place--her lawyer, interviewed on CNN, said she hadn't. Have you read anything documenting that they were at the same party, giving time and place yet. Maybe this has come out now. You haven't documented it doing so, though, and yet you are assuming the party happened. If you haven't seen documentation on this you showing your bias right there. You are assuming he was at a party that met the specifications without being able to cite a source of such a party. That's a bias popping out.

What's true is that he claimed there was no such event. Yes, if documentation puts them at the same place/time, his defense crumbles. Like so many things, if it did happen, he would have been better to admit it and say he was a minor struggling with sexuality, had been abhorred with what happened, and learned from it. Then, if no one else came forward to cover the last thirty-six years, he would have had a defense of his qualifying principles.

Not that any of us have a vote in this, but put them at the same location/time at least before making assumptions of guilt (which, yes, you are making).

No, I don't want him to get the nomination, but, no, I'm not content with defeating him by any means that can be cooked up.
 
I don’t watch CNN, and see you agreee with me.

“Cooked up”, and you are claiming that I am bias?

Yeah.....
 
a refresher for you Knee Growz

Brett Kavanaugh’s Mother Presided Over Foreclosure Case Involving Accuser’s Parents
 
I don’t watch CNN, and see you agreee with me.

“Cooked up”, and you are claiming that I am bias?

Yeah.....

still waiting for you to show me

what you posted

based on this

Because those allegations are based on falsehoods I have already proven.
 
I was born in 1954.

I am a witness, to how much has changed. I am also a witness, to how fucking long it is taking, for American society to catch up to 2018.


The rape in question may be more than 35 years, in the past, but it is getting an examination, NOW!

Sen. Kennedy had just left the office of Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).


Leigh Ann Caldwell

@LACaldwellDC


NEWS: sen Kennedy says there will be a public hearing with Kennedy and Ford.
A source close to the process says Kennedy’s statement is accurate.

5:35 PM - Sep 17, 2018

Some people's minds are stuck in a time-warp.

1918 was a long time, ago.

The people seeking to drag us back a hundred years, might drive fairly modern vehicles, wear clothing that has been recently manufactured, and have footwear that is easily identified. They are using computerized devices to communicate!

But, they do not want to acknowledge that women, LGBT, people from minority communities, or Native Americans, as full fledged people.

If this young woman was accepted as a human being, that was equal in all ways, would she have been victimized ?



Rape, In the Age of Computer Devices: Owen Labrie

The rape was committed on May 30, 2014

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/03/st-pauls-owen-labrie-rape-trial

New Twist: Did he communicate with a classmate over the internet with the intent of having sex?

September 14, 2018

During the half-hour oral arguments, friends and family members of the victim gathered in the seats behind Locke. Chessy Prout, who came forward in summer 2016 as the survivor in this case, was not in attendance, but her parents, Alex and Susan Prout, said they attended in support of their daughter, and to remind the court that they care and have a vested interest in the outcome of the appeal.

“Our daughter is our hero,” Susan Prout later said on the steps to the courthouse. “We are so proud of her. We are so proud of her voice. But, it hasn’t been easy, and no one should think that because she’s spoken up it’s been easy. It’s one day at a time.”


For years, a toxic culture of sexual abuse has festered at St. Paul’s, and it’s important that the details of long-held traditions and games of sexual conquest be exposed, Alex Prout said.


Earlier this year, the Prouts reached a confidential settlement with St. Paul’s, ending litigation in a civil lawsuit they filed in 2016 in U.S. District Court in Concord. In their lawsuit, they accused the school of failing to “meet its most basic obligations to protect the children entrusted to its care,” and said administrators knew about the “salute” but did nothing to curtail it.


https://www.vnews.com/Prep-school-grad-convicted-of-sex-assault-wants-new-trial-20156216
 
a refresher for you Knee Growz

Brett Kavanaugh’s Mother Presided Over Foreclosure Case Involving Accuser’s Parents

Trump Jr meets a Russian and you all scream about TRAITR and more

and

this CUNT is getting even and you all crickets

:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top