When running for office DO NOT fake your diploma

IG_88

Literotica Guru
Joined
May 11, 2018
Posts
3,373
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/12/politics/melissa-howard-miami-university/index.html

A Florida state house candidate's college degree has been called into question -- by the very university that she claimed to have graduated from.

Melissa Howard, a Republican who is running for the Florida House of Representatives District 73, claimed to have graduated from Miami University, in Oxford, Ohio.
But last week, FLA News reported that Howard didn't have a college degree from Miami University.
In a statement responding to FLA News, Howard's campaign said the story was an attempt by her opponent in the primary to "hurt Melissa or her reputation within the community," and that she graduated with a degree in marketing.
The 46-year-old candidate later posted what FLA News described as a partial college transcript, as well as pictures of her posing with a diploma on her Facebook page. The images were no longer available on Sunday.
In response to her photos, FLA News, which calls itself "the conservative choice for Florida news and politics" briefly rescinded its story.
But Miami University also told CNN and other news outlets it has no record of Howard earning a degree there. The school said that Melissa Marie Fox (Howard's maiden name) had attended Miami University, from August 1990 to May 1994, but she never graduated.
The university also pointed out a few critical flaws on the image of the diploma that Howard had briefly posted on social media.
The image showed that she received a Bachelor of Science in Marketing degree, but the university said, "We have no such record of a degree." That's because the university says its degree for marketing majors, both then and now, is called a Bachelor of Science in Business.
Also, Howard's major while she was enrolled at Miami University had been retailing, and the degree for that program would have been a Bachelor of Science in Family and Consumer Sciences, according to the university.
The picture of the diploma included the signatures of James Garland, who was the president of the university in 1996, and of Robert C. Johnson, who was actually the dean of the graduate school, which would not have been the proper school, the university statement said.
The university counsel said in a statement to CNN that the picture of the diploma "does not appear to be an accurate Miami University diploma."
 
I saw, when caught, she called the report that she faked it was "Fake News".
I laughed at that.
 
... if you are a Republican.



If you are a Democrat, you can claim to be an American Native and expect it to not be questioned and for the questioners, including the tribe, to be ridiculed and impugned.
 
Melissa Howard, a Republican who is running for the Florida House of Representatives District 73, claimed to have graduated from Miami University, in Oxford, Ohio
. OK now I am really confused. Miami and Ohio?
 
Melissa Howard, a Republican who is running for the Florida House of Representatives District 73, claimed to have graduated from Miami University, in Oxford, Ohio
. OK now I am really confused. Miami and Ohio?



The Miami River runs through the area.



I don't know why it was so important for her to fabricate a degree. What difference would it have made? It's not like there's any expectation that a state legislator has to be a scholar too. There was a discussion in here a few years ago about whether or not it was a big deal that Scott Walker was a college dropout, and I took the position that it really wasn't.

But lying about something that's provably false is a career-killer for any politician who doesn't have a cult backing him/her.
 
"But lying about something that's provably false is a career-killer for any politician who doesn't have a cult backing him/her."

Sorry WE, but that last contention is a bunch of happy horse shit. Take Teddy Kennedy, for example.
 
situational Native American speak with forked tongue

... if you are a Republican.



If you are a Democrat, you can claim to be an American Native and expect it to not be questioned and for the questioners, including the tribe, to be ridiculed and impugned.
Whattaboutism.
"But lying about something that's provably false is a career-killer for any politician who doesn't have a cult backing him/her."

Sorry WE, but that last contention is a bunch of happy horse shit. Take Teddy Kennedy, for example.

Whattaboutism redux.

"But...but...Mom! The other side does it toooooooooooooooo"
 
"But lying about something that's provably false is a career-killer for any politician who doesn't have a cult backing him/her."

Sorry WE, but that last contention is a bunch of happy horse shit. Take Teddy Kennedy, for example.

That guy had been dead a long time
 
Nobody does it quite like notAJIdidntvoteforhimbutIdefendhimdaily.

NotAJ the Housesquaw would gladly permit Trump to burn down his teepee, if he thought the smoke from the fire would irritate his librul neighbors for a few minutes.

That's how he derps.
 
NotAJ routinely has to plunge deep into his Butthurt Victim Archive to find an spurious unrelated example to support his BotanyBoy-esque "both sides do it" mantra.

Umm well both sides do do it. Looks bad on all of them but it seems people don't care. Nana nana boo boo makes as much sense. It's a pox on their both houses.
 
Umm well both sides do do it. Looks bad on all of them but it seems people don't care. Nana nana boo boo makes as much sense. It's a pox on their both houses.

Not buying the horseshit you're selling, chumly.

It's called "balance equivalency fallacy", which has been a staple of the RWCJ response team for several years now.

Basically, I find 100 examples of conservative malfeasance, an RWCJer finds a couple of anecdotal examples of liberal/moderate/progressive malfeasance, and the NotRepublicans here then squeal "see? Both sides do it tooooo, mom!"

See also: Climate change denial
 
That guy had been dead a long time

Does not matter, as I pointed out before, no one of any position of authority/power in the Democrat Party has ever called out Senator Warren over her claims, they are just accepted without proof, but to also delve into the past, when the serious charges against Dubya were launched, pretty much every single Democrat sided with Dan Rather's line of argument, so what if the documents are forgeries? the story is still true.

A large body of Democrats still believe in the Steele oppo research as literal truth and that there was a "Russian Collusion" that swayed the election from the winner of the popular vote. They want to investigate and interrogate in reverse proportion to their intransigence and opposition to any and all investigations into the Obama administration form F&F to Benghazi and the subsequent antics of the DC elites (especially they intelligence agencies) to undermine the current President; and I say, let them investigate, let them waste time and let them waste money, because the downfall of Trump is way more important than feeding hungry children!

But, we could also include a lot of Democrats starting with Menendez and ending with Pelosi, no, not ending there, who fake their honesty and integrity while getting rich off the system. The allure of such access to the wealth of a nation, corrupts many politicians, no matter which party they identify with. In a case like this, embellishment is a lie, I'll hand you that, but only the embellishments of one team come under more scrutiny...
 
*chuckle*


Look at all the ankle-biters who lack the ability to form cogent statements and are reduced to schoolyard taunts. What are they going to do next?

Insult my mother?
 
Speaking of dishonest Republicans, would a Manafort conviction establish Mueller as the true Swamp Drainer? And will Trump pardon him so he can reenter the swamp?
 
Manafort's crimes were long ago, far away and only being prosecuted because the swamp needs a trophy.

The law took a pass on him long ago.

I am glad that they are now finally closing in on him, but clearly not for the same reasons that you are.
 
Manafort's crimes were long ago, far away and only being prosecuted because the swamp needs a trophy.

The law took a pass on him long ago.

I am glad that they are now finally closing in on him, but clearly not for the same reasons that you are.

I’m glad because he’s a criminal. And will your President ignore that fact and set him free? And will you and Botboy defend him as usual?
 
I’m glad because he’s a criminal. And will your President ignore that fact and set him free? And will you and Botboy defend him as usual?

"My" President is an ascription. He is our President, for better or worse.
I was always confident that he would never survive the primaries, let alone the general.

Had Secretary Clinton won, I doubt that you would be critical of anything or any policy that she instigated because you are such a principled "Independent." It would follow your pattern when it came to the Obama Administration.
 
Not buying the horseshit you're selling, chumly.

It's called "balance equivalency fallacy", which has been a staple of the RWCJ response team for several years now.

Basically, I find 100 examples of conservative malfeasance, an RWCJer finds a couple of anecdotal examples of liberal/moderate/progressive malfeasance, and the NotRepublicans here then squeal "see? Both sides do it tooooo, mom!"

See also: Climate change denial

You may not call me chumlee. and when did I bring up climate change
 
Back
Top