Chicago, August 4, Barack Obama Day

[SpeareChucker]

4 dead
40 injured
Mostly not white...

http://time.com/5358419/chicago-gun-violence-40-shootings/

 

[about_average]

It will be interesting to see how many of the deaths were gang related, then see how many of those gangs were involved in the drug trade, fueled by the "war on drugs" in an effort to keep something illegal that shouldn't be.

 

[SpeareChucker]

60+ shot, 10 dead.


Chicago is run by an Obama Administration insider.
So, it's been ten years of Chicago being ruled by its own citizen politicians, who did nothing to quell the violence.

But yeah, let's blame the war on drugs because that holds harmless the emerging mentality that the thugs are not the problem, the police are the problem and we want them to stop harassing black people and to stop profiling them for gang associations.

 

[Stain_mAnn]

What a stupid prairee nigger. Who got him so triggered today?

Oh, Obama again.

 

[SpeareChucker]

More racism. They are no longer willing to deny that they are the party of Jim Crow, the KKK and resistance to civil rights.

Get out the dogs and firehoses!

 

[about_average]

But yeah, let's blame the war on drugs because that holds harmless the emerging mentality that the thugs are not the problem, the police are the problem and we want them to stop harassing black people and to stop profiling them for gang associations.

Wrong again.
I've never suggested that gangs shouldn't be prosecuted.
What I'm saying is that, if you had any clue about history, gangs aren't going to be suppressed in any meaningful way as long as there is money to be made and there will always be money to be made as long as drugs are illegal.

And you're your typical BS artist saying I blame the police or hold harmless those who unjustly blame them.

It's amazing to me that you can be wrong on so many levels.

 

[about_average]

More racism. They are no longer willing to deny that they are the party of Jim Crow, the KKK and resistance to civil rights

Wrong, again.
I proved that wrong in response to one of Rightguide's BS posts about the same thing.

 

[SpeareChucker]

You are assuming things that I did not say.

 

[Rightguide]

What a stupid prairee nigger. Who got him so triggered today?

Oh, Obama again.

^^^
More from the typical democrat racist.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Like a NYTimes new hire, they are proud of their racism; it lets the world know which team they are playing for.

 

[Rightguide]

Wrong, again.
I proved that wrong in response to one of Rightguide's BS posts about the same thing.

You've never proved me wrong on any matter of discussion.

 

[SpeareChucker]

You've never proved me wrong on any matter of discussion.

Go easy. It seems to be the only thing he can say. He's like a parrot with Tourettes.

 

[Stain_mAnn]

More racism. They are no longer willing to deny that they are the party of Jim Crow, the KKK and resistance to civil rights.

Get out the dogs and firehoses!

Says the moron who made a thread because it was mostly "non whites" who were shot. Your joy over this shows your racism, prairee nigger.

 

[Stain_mAnn]

Like a NYTimes new hire, they are proud of their racism; it lets the world know which team they are playing for.

Oh the irony is thick.

 

[about_average]

You've never proved me wrong on any matter of discussion.

Of course not, soon as you read the proof you bail on the thread.

 

[about_average]

You are assuming things that I did not say.

Wrong, again.

You claimed that the democratic party was the party against civil rights, when in fact democrats were more likely to vote for the civil rights act than republicans were as I showed RG, despite his denials.

If that wasn't the claim, exactly which party were were you referring to?

 

[Rightguide]

Like a NYTimes new hire, they are proud of their racism; it lets the world know which team they are playing for.

Their party is the traditional home of the KKK, Jim Crow, Segregation, and the institution of American slavery. Only one of the racist Dixiecrats that opposed the Civil Rights laws ever left the Party for the GOP.

Let us recall the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 80% of Republicans in the House voted for it, only 61% of Democrats did so. In the Senate, 82% of Republicans voted in favor, against 69% of Democrats voting in the affirmative.

 

[Rightguide]

Of course not, soon as you read the proof you bail on the thread.

I go to work. I don't bail on a thread out of fear for the likes of your intellect. My attendance is sketchy because I've been on the road for the best part of a month.

 

[nowisthetime]

But....Obamaaaaa!


I just chalk up the banned poster as being an instigating troll.

Nothing more, nothing less.

He's really not interested in having a sane discussion, but rather to thumb his nose at the "Left" by invoking Obama or Hillary or some other Non white or non male Democrat figure. Lately the right has been focused on yet another minority, Ocasio.


Furthermore, I've never seen a bunch of racist old foggies so up to their ass about a former ex president.

Yawn, next!

 

[Rightguide]

But....Obamaaaaa!


I just chalk up the banned poster as being an instigating troll.

Nothing more, nothing less.

He's really not interested in having a sane discussion, but rather to thumb his nose at the "Left" by invoking Obama or Hillary or some other Non white or non male Democrat figure. Lately the right has been focused on yet another minority, Ocasio.


Furthermore, I've never seen a bunch of racist old foggies so up to their ass about a former ex president.

Yawn, next!

He was only a pretender, unable to live up to the American standard for "President."

 

[nowisthetime]

Thread is classic AJ, he gets into this sort of rabid race-baiting spamming mode RIGHT before getting yet ANOTHER ban. It's all a game to him.

Or perhaps whenever thoughts of his BLACK ex crosses his mind, he goes into rage mode? Hmm?



Alas, we know most domestic terrorism and RANDOM mass shootings ACROSS TE NATION are committed by rightist males. However,they love deflecting from that issue by bringing up.....



CHHHHHHHHHHIIICAAGOOOOO!


Furthermore, since they ENJOY hating the nearly perfect O out of jealousy (because their ogre of a president sucks), they love linking that city to him as if that makes sense, but silly me, rightists never really make a lick of sense.

May I add, most violence is perpetrated against those with whom one is familiar, usually someone of the same race, since Americans tend to live in a racial bubble. This goes for all races. But nah, what sense does that make to rightists?

Gosh, they are so predictable!

 

[about_average]

Let us recall the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 80% of Republicans in the House voted for it, only 61% of Democrats did so. In the Senate, 82% of Republicans voted in favor, against 69% of Democrats voting in the affirmative.

Good analysis of the statistics. LMAO

 

[needit700]

Bfd

this is every city and we can thank the open borders and gangs!!!

 

[Ramone45]

Wrong again.
I've never suggested that gangs shouldn't be prosecuted.
What I'm saying is that, if you had any clue about history, gangs aren't going to be suppressed in any meaningful way as long as there is money to be made and there will always be money to be made as long as drugs are illegal.

And you're your typical BS artist saying I blame the police or hold harmless those who unjustly blame them.

It's amazing to me that you can be wrong on so many levels.

I completely agree. Do you think all the dysfunction in Central America and the resulting refugee crisis is caused by The United States' appetite for illegal drugs?

 

[about_average]

I go to work. I don't bail on a thread out of fear for the likes of your intellect. My attendance is sketchy because I've been on the road for the best part of a month.

Ok, then I'll wait for your rebuttal.