The enemy press?

Veroe

Maestro/Truthseeker
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Posts
63,401
I am curious to get everyone's thoughts on this. If the press is "The enemy of the people" what would be the solution to this problem you'd propose?
 
Who is that? Replace him with who?

There's a succession plan in place. Not wild about those in line, but the immediate solution needed for all sorts of reasons is to get Donald Trump out of the White House (and I don't mean to one of his golf clubs).

The last time we were in a quite similar position, when the Nixon government was trying to suppress the publication of the Pentagon Papers, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, in the majority opinion in New York Times Co. v. United States (1971), wrote the following: "The press was to serve the governed, not the governors."

That's essentially where we are again.
 
Your question is invalid. The press is not the enemy of the people. It is their protector. It seeks to keep them informed on matters they would otherwise not be aware of.

Only those who have something to hide consider a free press their enemy.
 
Your question is invalid. The press is not the enemy of the people. It is their protector. It seeks to keep them informed on matters they would otherwise not be aware of.

Only those who have something to hide consider a free press their enemy.

Personally I agree, but that's not what this thread is for.

Maybe I phrased the question wrong in the first post. I'm asking if Trump is right and the press is "The enemy of the people" what would the actions taken to solve the problem be? Which of those actions you'd be ok with and which would cross the redline for you?
 
Again, it's an invalid question, especially since it's the con artist.

Since it's invalid, there is no way to answer it.
 
He that”shall not be named” will get around to asking Putin for the next step
 
Of course it isn't. All of this consternation brings people to the press coverage. What evidence do you have either that the press is losing revenue or that press sources are shrinking?

Oops? Did I just ask James for evidence of one of his statements? That was a waste of time, wasn't it?
 
50 years ago Tampa had 5 daily papers and a dozen weeklies. Now one daily is all there is. The lone daily closed all its satellite plants and newsrooms. No winos selling papers out on the streets.

PILOT you make it too easy. A legless blind man could kick your ass.
 
They've just gone on line. I'll bet there are more media sources there (and more people working in media) than there were five years ago--and certainly more available to an individual living there than there were in the world of print. You've just overstayed your lifestyle, James. Maybe you can actually put some sourcing to your claims. No, probably not. That would be something new for you too.

Everything is easy for you, James, because you just run on unsupported sour opinion. That's easy to do.
 
They've just gone on line. I'll bet there are more media sources there (and more people working in media) than there were five years ago--and certainly more available to an individual living there than there were in the world of print. You've just overstayed your lifestyle, James. Maybe you can actually put some sourcing to your claims. No, probably not. That would be something new for you too.

Everything is easy for you, James, because you just run on unsupported sour opinion. That's easy to do.

No. Boy Blunder.
 
50 years ago Tampa had 5 daily papers and a dozen weeklies. Now one daily is all there is. The lone daily closed all its satellite plants and newsrooms. No winos selling papers out on the streets.

PILOT you make it too easy. A legless blind man could kick your ass.
Name them.
 
Back
Top