The "Studies" are crap.

bellisarius

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Posts
16,761
A recent study of Studies indicates what many of us already knew, the 'studies' are junk.

Study of Studies.

This seems to be particularly true of studies concerning Social Psychology and Medicine. The Medicine aspect is somewhat eye opening although This was explored on the board a decade or so ago with a poster named Crysede leading the way.

As far as the Social Psychology aspect is concerned, no surprise at all. 80% of what the Social Psychologists have been churning out for over a decade is shit. They've been living in an echo chamber publishing papers for each other for quite a while now.
 
In my 1st Yr in College

I was hired to help conduct a study

Interviewing many people and getting answers to questions



BUT

I just wanted the MONEY and COULDNT care less

So I just filled in all the answers myself



Studies are useless
 
There is a profound epistemological question at the heart of this issue, and I doubt the OP is smart enough to grasp it. *shrug*
 
There is a profound epistemological question at the heart of this issue, and I doubt the OP is smart enough to grasp it. *shrug*

The philosophy of epistemic closure ("avoid inconvenient facts") has long been a core tenet of the Literotica General Board Troglodyte Right Wing Circle Jerk partisans.

"Education Bad. Facts Bad. But Her Emails!"
 
Reality is what's left after you stop believing shit.
 
Let's see, who has a greater financial interest in the 'study' game?

* Academics who'll be granted a few thousand for their studies.
* Corporations that'll lose billions if their misdeeds are revealed.

I'll take door number two.
 
Let's see, who has a greater financial interest in the 'study' game?

* Academics who'll be granted a few thousand for their studies.
* Corporations that'll lose billions if their misdeeds are revealed.

I'll take door number two.

The story ideas section is still down the hall.
 
A recent study of Studies indicates what many of us already knew, the 'studies' are junk.

Study of Studies.

This seems to be particularly true of studies concerning Social Psychology and Medicine. The Medicine aspect is somewhat eye opening although This was explored on the board a decade or so ago with a poster named Crysede leading the way.

As far as the Social Psychology aspect is concerned, no surprise at all. 80% of what the Social Psychologists have been churning out for over a decade is shit. They've been living in an echo chamber publishing papers for each other for quite a while now.

That reminds me of the paper a few years back that proved statistically that most all studies are flawed, assuming of course, their math wasn't flawed.


:D :D :D


The worst offenders are the studies related to our "health" as you pointed out.
Soft Sciences don't really have a way to "prove" anything.
 
Let's see, who has a greater financial interest in the 'study' game?

* Academics who'll be granted a few thousand for their studies.
* Corporations that'll lose billions if their misdeeds are revealed.

I'll take door number two.

Number two is a canard. As John Stossel writes, he got his start finding and outing crooks on the local level, but when his fame propelled him to the national level he discovered that there wasn't a lot of corporate malfeasance to be found because of the efforts they take to protect the corporate brand and maintain customer loyalty.
 
Back
Top