bellisarius
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2017
- Posts
- 16,761
Your truly heartwarming lack of acceptance of slavery notwithstanding, you simply have no knowledge of history in this regard.
I'm afraid you are the ignorant.
Slaves were of great fungible value as property, especially so after the passage of the Slave Trade Ban of 1807. The owner that physically brutalized their slaves was in effect committing economic suicide and they knew it. That is NOT to say that such brutalization did not occur, it is to say that it wasn't anywhere near as common as some historians would have you believe. The mental anguish associated with families being split up by the sale of a husband, wife, or child was brutal enough.
As an example of slave treatment, when Butler captured New Orleans for the Union he freed the slaves, an act that created all sorts of problems for Lincoln and the government. Two days after Butler's action the former slaves marched on his headquarters demanding food, shelter, clothing, and work. More that a few went back to their former 'masters' begging for their positions back and quite a few of those were told to go pack sand, "You're the Yankees problem now." I'm certain that the use of the word 'problem' was borne of some bitterness, but it is telling. Some former owners did 'hire' their slaves back, but at a less than subsistence wage. Overall, as poor as life under slavery was, the standard of living of the former slaves fell.............substantially so.
And the former owners learned a valuable lesson from emancipation. Although they had lost a great deal as far as net worth was concerned it cost them far less to 'pay' the former slaves to do the same work they formerly did. They no longer had to provide food, lodging, clothing, or medical, the upkeep they had previously been burdened with. Enter the era of Jim Crow and sharecropping.