Carnal_Flower
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 31, 2014
- Posts
- 7,031
Feel free to add your own.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ask after the midterm elections. Just spinning wheels and offering up targets before then.
No party has serious contenders now. Remember Tromp campaigning, sucking the media oxygen from everyone else with his deranged shows? That's where any would-be-POTUS is -- whatever they do or say, Tromp will trump them.Yeah but I don't think any of them are serious contenders--except Eric Holder, maybe.
adam schiff
elizabeth warren
john warner
jeff flake
Tulsi Gabbard should be in the first rank. Harris and most of the Establishment Demos are toast.
It'll be Hillary
and the DON again.
Tulsi Gabbard should be in the first rank. Harris and most of the Establishment Demos are toast.
A Democrat will win in 2024, and if Obama, Clinton, and Carter are any indicators, he/she will be a dark horse that neither I, nor likely many people, will have heard of until less than 2 years before the election, perhaps not even until 2024.
Yea i kinda have to agree with this, because based on the lineup of the 2016 democratic primaries they just don't have anyone the people can really get behind. I mean i was literally laughing my ass off because the 2016 democratic primaries seemed more like the DNC trying to give the democrat nomination to HRC and make it look like legitimate voting. Not that i could blame any of the democrat candidates at the time because who in their right mind would want to go against the Clinton political WAR MACHINE. Yes friends i used those three words in the same sentence POLITICAL WAR MACHINE. I do have to give full credit to Bernie Sanders though, he stayed in until the end.
As for whether or not HRC will run again is an interesting question, but if she did what the news reports say i doubt it but it depends how forgiving her supporters are.
Not sure if i see HRC as someone who was trying to ride her husbands coattails, I'd actually have to argue she was planning her own presidential run as far back as during the time of the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Because any normal woman would rip their cheating, philandering husband a new one rather than go with the "stand by my man" route.I never liked the idea of the first woman president being someone who rid on her husband's coattails. I see her as a lesser evil than Trump, but not by much. Much better than either were Stein and Johnson.
I don't see her running any more than Carter did after 1980, but she might be a mover and shaker in the primaries, though I doubt that will make much of a difference.