Ted Nugent slams 'mushy brained' Parkland survivors: 'They have no soul'

Ted's gone on a Journey To The Center Of His Mind. Problem is, he can't find it. He keeps thinking He'll Prove He's Right, but he's only become Saint Wayne's Friend.
 
Ted and the children

Here is a start. Lots of articles on this if you do a search.

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/music/11-rock-stars-who-allegedly-slept-with-underage-girls-7980930

See section on family in this wikipedia write up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nugent

But of course you can just go to Ted's Lyrics. Here is a catchy number for you.

"Well, I don't care if you're just thirteen
You look too good to be true
I just know that you're probably clean
There's one little think I got do to you

Jailbait you look so good to me
Jailbait won't you set me free
Jailbait you look fine, fine, fine
And I know I've got to have you in a matter of time"

Didn't get as much airplay as Catch Scratch Fever" or Wang Dang Sweet Poontang
 
Ted Nugent. The most overrated, idiotic rockstar on the planet. Yet, anytime the left wing liberal media quotes him, the entire progressive nation goes bezerk.

This thread is a good source of irony. - Liam. :)
 
It doesn't say "the right of militias to keep and bear arms", does it?
http://constitutionus.com -- find MILITIA -- 6 occurrences
Article I, Section 8: The Congress shall have Power...
15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

16: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Article II, Section 2: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;

Amendment 2: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment 5: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger;

The well-regulated militia was conceived as an integral part of the nation's defence and security forces, in place of a standing army. That's the reason for arms-bearing expressed in the 2nd's first two clauses, the words you dismiss. Do you trust a fucking UNregulated militia "to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions"??

And their goes Hypoxia on the second amendment. So predictable. Read it closely. It does not say, we are giving you the right to bear arms, it says the government cannot infringe upon your right to bear arms.
Piss up another tree. Your arms-bearing is already quite infringed upon. You don't get to bear missiles, nukes, mustard gas, morningstars, bazookas, grenades, or switchblades. Laws specify your current allowed weaponry. Future laws can specify what, where, and when you can carry. You think such laws won't be enacted? What're you smoking?
 
That's not what the constitution says, nor is it what the SCOTUS has deemed appropriate.

Nice try though.

Keep on misinterpreting, and parroting the same BS over and over and over in hopes that no one will notice.
Yes it is. The Second Amendment reads "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Here, let me simplify it via wikkipedia:



It doesn't say "the right of militias to keep and bear arms", does it?

:rolleyes:
Your wiki quote does not give the exact wording. My quote, however, does.
 
Ted is playing the whole "extreme rhetoric" card, which is stupid. The Parkland shooting was a huge failure on many levels. The laws on the books would have stopped him, if our governmental systems actually worked. Those kids are pawns of the idiots on the left and right. The left is using them to drive a narrative, and the right is slapping them for it, while the real assholes with money have us all fighting. I am a proud NRA member and gun owner, as is my whole family. We buy our guns legally. I'm not going to sit quietly by while this issue makes my out to be evil. I have six kids and love them with all my heart, and as sure as I'm typing here, I'd use my second amendment rights to protect them from anyone. I would hope that all of you who have guns would post a sign outside saying you do, and all those who are dead set against owning guns post a similar sign stating they don't have any. This way, I figure we can see how guns truly effect the safety of one's home, and we can show the world the strength of our resolve.
 
Followup note: Article I Section 8 says, "The Congress shall have Power... To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia..."

Who arms the militia? Congress, not the NRA or Glock. You have a much-limited right to bear arms issued by Congress when called up "to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions..." That's the Militia's stated job: security and defense.
 
Followup note: Article I Section 8 says, "The Congress shall have Power... To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia..."

Who arms the militia? Congress, not the NRA or Glock. You have a much-limited right to bear arms issued by Congress when called up "to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions..." That's the Militia's stated job: security and defense.

Don't you get it? We don't care what you or anyone like you says. You can interpret the laws, to fit your narrative all day long and it doesn't change a single gun owners mind. So push you point, and I believe, you believe what you're pushing, but it doesn't change the fact that it is your side's point of view and not our's. This is America and we do have a right to voice our opinions and others have the right to ignore it.
 
Don't you get it? We don't care what you or anyone like you says. You can interpret the laws, to fit your narrative all day long and it doesn't change a single gun owners mind. So push you point, and I believe, you believe what you're pushing, but it doesn't change the fact that it is your side's point of view and not our's. This is America and we do have a right to voice our opinions and others have the right to ignore it.
I have zero interest in winning an Internet argument. I give not a flying fuck about convincing anyone of anything. I only point what what the Constitution says. If you don't like what it says, write your own. If you think your right to bear arms includes banned weapons, dream on. See how far you get down the street carrying that bazooka on your shoulder.
 
I have zero interest in winning an Internet argument. I give not a flying fuck about convincing anyone of anything. I only point what what the Constitution says. If you don't like what it says, write your own. If you think your right to bear arms includes banned weapons, dream on. See how far you get down the street carrying that bazooka on your shoulder.

HaHa!!!!! That's right I want to carry a bazooka,I want to write my own constitution, I want to own banned guns, and of course don't forget that I'm not as educated as you are about the constitution. Dumb folk like me need brilliant people like you to spout off about the subject, not to convince us but to purely educate us on "the way things are". In that case thank you for sharing your vast knowledge, purely for educational purposes. Wink wink.
 
HaHa!!!!! That's right I want to carry a bazooka,I want to write my own constitution, I want to own banned guns, and of course don't forget that I'm not as educated as you are about the constitution. Dumb folk like me need brilliant people like you to spout off about the subject, not to convince us but to purely educate us on "the way things are". In that case thank you for sharing your vast knowledge, purely for educational purposes. Wink wink.
You're going to fit right in here.

Show us your tits.
 
Yes it is.

No it isn't....it's not even close to what hypoxia is saying (and you by backing it).

2A doesn't even suggest "If you want to bear arms in public, be a vetted member of a well-regulated militia. " or that the right to bear arms is that of the militia granted at the discretion of congress as Hypoxia also seems to believe.


Hypoxia is totally ignoring "the right of the people" part of 2A or is pretending that actually means "the right of the government" because SCOTUS got that wrong and people don't have rights, only the government does.

Are you like Hypoxia in holding the believe the Bill of Rights is a list of rights of the government holds over the people and not a list of individual rights the government isn't supposed to violate??
 
Last edited:
Who Posted?
Total Posts: 97
User Name Posts
Saint_Ann 22
Luke_Atmydik 11
Hypoxia 9
bellisarius 8
richard_daily 7
WoundedKnee 5
 
Back
Top