So, you think this memo thing has legs?

[Sean]

Maybe this why Obama lawyered up a week or so ago:


BREAKING: Intel Officer Reveals Obama Could Be ‘First President In History’ To Be Hit With a FELONY INDICTMENT
BySamuel Chamberlain

After months of the liberal media ridiculing Trump over his claim that Obama spied on him during the election, Trump finally got vindication this week. America learned the truth on Tuesday that Obama did in fact unconstitutionally spy on Trump throughout the presidential election, leaving Barack Obama with his pants down yet again.

Now former intelligence officer Lt. Col Tony Shaffer just revealed that Obama’s wiretapping was not only a federal crime, but says that the results of this investigation will likely result in Obama being brought up on FELONY CHARGES. The colonel’s dire prediction about Obama’s future is sending shock-waves through the black hearts of liberals all across America today, as it’s now thrown a monkey wrench into Obama’s plans to stage his “political comeback” this fall.

In a a recent interview with Trending Today USA, Lt. Col Tony Shaffer called ‘Obamagate’ an “order of magnitude” even bigger than the Watergate scandal because the incident included “using nation-state resources for purposes of political gain.”

When asked if Obama could be arrested for violating the law, he said that it would be the “first time a former president could be indicted for a felony.”

“…I think it is very possible that he acted outside of the scope of his duties, responsibilities and authorities to turn the resources of a nation-state on a candidate. This is, as I’ve said before, soviet-dictator level wrongdoing,” he added.

More here:

https://theglobalheadlines.net/brea...history-to-be-hit-with-a-felony-indictment-2/

Oh. My. Fucking. God. Do you deliberately go searching the internet for the biggest bullshit sites you can find?

 

[HisArpy]

Inside help? Oh noes! Is it....the DEEP STATE?

It could be.

Or it could be her Huey Long mentality. Or was it Boss Hogg? I forget if there's a difference between the 2.

 

[Rightguide]

You left out 1 possibility, which appears to be manifest as a result of the memo; H has inside help covering up her misdeeds and disposing of the evidence.

Having a room temperature IQ limits CowDude's options for understanding.

 

[Rightguide]

That's a clickbait site you fucking racist imbecile.

Well now, you pitiful pair of suppurating pussy lips, it may be, but that doesn't change the fact that Lt. Col Tony Shaffer is a real person who did, in fact, make that prediction. So, do slap a Maxi Pad over your leaking lips and save yourself the embarrassment.

 

[cowslinger64]

You left out 1 possibility, which appears to be manifest as a result of the memo; H has inside help covering up her misdeeds and disposing of the evidence.

So you're that fuckin dumb. I got it. It's obvious you're a republican then.. just like the rest of the countless idiots that one woman has been able to outdo.

Really??

Having a room temperature IQ limits CowDude's options for understanding.

What would you know about an iq, vette? You are under the delusion that you're someone else.


Tell ya what.. next time I'm in Californee... I'll stop by and we can compare dicks.

 

[HisArpy]

Having a room temperature IQ limits CowDude's options for understanding.

Are you sure it's even room temperature?

 

[HisArpy]

So you're that fuckin dumb. I got it. It's obvious you're a republican then.. just like the rest of the countless idiots that one woman has been able to outdo.

Really??

Well, one woman, a ton of money, and a legion of sycophants who will do anything in the name of getting some of that money.

What would you know about an iq, vette? You are under the delusion that you're someone else.


Tell ya what.. next time I'm in Californee... I'll stop by and we can compare dicks.

Don't do it. He just wants to get in your pants.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Well now, you pitiful pair of suppurating pussy lips, it may be, but that doesn't change the fact that Lt. Col Tony Shaffer is a real person who did, in fact, make that prediction. So, do slap a Maxi Pad over your leaking lips and save yourself the embarrassment.

This is going to be another of your "I just posted it, I didn't say I believed in it" fails when it turns out to be bunk and you go silent on it hoping everyone will forget in fickleness, just like Obama's $100M-a-day state trip to India, huh, Vette?

http://i.imgur.com/ZsVxyu9.gif

fail even before the actual fail.

 

[Rightguide]

A legal "expert" who could develop a 30 count indictment on someone's opinion with no evidence. LMAO

Not quite average, crippled by ignorance of the law, evidence already in the public domain, the function of the House Intelligence Committee, comfortably assumes it's findings are mere "opinion" unencumbered by truth, but he forgets this is the Republican majority finding, not the desperate ass covering defense against federal prison time the Democrat minority will be producing.

 

[Rightguide]

This is going to be another of your "I just posted it, I didn't say I believed in it" fails when it turns out to be bunk and you go silent on it hoping everyone will forget in fickleness, just like Obama's $100M-a-day state trip to India, huh, Vette?

http://i.imgur.com/ZsVxyu9.gif

fail even before the actual fail.

 

[Sean]

Not quite average, crippled by ignorance of the law, evidence already in the public domain, the function of the House Intelligence Committee, comfortably assumes it's findings are mere "opinion" unencumbered by truth, but he forgets this is the Republican majority finding, not the desperate ass covering defense against federal prison time the Democrat minority will be producing.

Even Benghazi Gowdy thinks it's bullshit.

 

[WoundedKnee]

Well. This went well.

 

[Aglaopheme]

The letter, dated Aug. 25, 2013, was sent by Page to an academic press during a dispute over edits to an unpublished manuscript he had submitted for publication, according to an editor who worked with Page.

“Over the past half year, I have had the privilege to serve as an informal advisor to the staff of the Kremlin in preparation for their Presidency of the G-20 Summit next month, where energy issues will be a prominent point on the agenda,” the letter reads.

Page says that thereafter the FBI began a retaliatory campaign against him. According to published reports, the FBI obtained a first FISA warrant to eavesdrop on Page’s electronic communications during 2013. And they have been paying attention to him, on and off, ever since.

http://amp.timeinc.net/time/5132126/carter-page-russia-2013-letter

 

[BobBalouski]

According to published reports, the FBI obtained a first FISA warrant to eavesdrop on Page’s electronic communications during 2013.

Of course, the linked "published reports" source (a Washington Post piece from April 11, 2017) actually reports no such thing at all.

Page first came to the FBI's attention in 2013, and then was thoroughly investigated (with no need of a FISA warrant) as being connected to suspected Russian spies. Those Russians were eventually charged as spies in January 2015. Page was not then, and has never been, charged with any illegal activities connected to those individuals, or Russian spying in general.

In March 2016, Trump did an interview with The Washington Post editorial board and told them Carter Page was on his team as a foreign policy advisor. Two months later, in May 2016, Fusion GPS was retained by both the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Party to dig up all the political dirt they could find on Donald Trump; within a month Fusion GPS contracted ex-British spy Christopher Steele to do that totally partisan dirty work for them. Naturally, Carter Page's then 3-year old suspected ties to Russian spying easily came to the forefront...

...and the politically-corrupt Obama administration then ordered the FBI to collaborate with (and pay) Steele to use his politically-partisan hit-piece dossier - entirely commissioned by Obama's DNC and Clinton's campaign - as "evidence" to convince a judge to issue the first FISA warrant against Page, one that was renewed 3 more times at the required 90 day intervals.

Page has had an FBI file open on him since at least 2013; he's had 4 FISA warrants levied against him - all only after the infamous Steele dossier was used against him. And yet, with as much investigative might as any individual can possibly have wielded against her/him, Page's FISA warrant has not been renewed in the last year and not one single charge has ever been filed against him. The relevant (criminal) point: no FISA warrant would've ever been issued against Page if the Obama administration hadn't ordered the FBI to use the politically partisan Steele dossier as "evidence" for it, with the ultimate goal of smearing Trump enough to guarantee he'd lose the upcoming election.

It's going to be interesting hearing/reading what the judge who issued that Fwarrant against Page tells the House Intelligence Committee...

 

[OldJourno]

Look! Wee Willie Clinton!

I'll rephrase my question slightly: Can you point to any jurisdiction in the world that has convicted the Clintons or their foundation of any wrongdoing?

Now look at Mr Tromp, who was convicted of racial discrimination, and has settled literally thousands of court cases (which one avoids if innocent), and has bragged of his illegal activities. He IS a crook, and quite explicit. Duh.

What is a $90,000 fine and losing a license to practice law? Is that not a finding of wrongdoing?

 

[Charismata]

All this chest-thumping and partisan-sniping plus $5.00 will get you a coffee at Starbucks. Why not save all the arm-chair quarterbacking for the Superbowl and leave the investigation to those being paid to do it. It'll all come out in the wash and then we'll know who was guilty and who was lying. My personal money says that Trump and his family/cartel will go down for money laundering long before the Clintons or Obama are found guilty of anything other than pissing off conservatives.

 

[Saint Peter]

What fun would that be?

 

[rae121452]

the intention behind the memo:

Fruit of the poisonous tree is a legal doctrine according to which any secondary evidence obtained indirectly through illicit means is inadmissible in court.

Examples of such sources include evidence gained through eavesdropping, illegal wiretapping, coercive interrogations, unwarranted searches, or improperly conducted arrests. Information obtained from those sources is inadmissible according to the law of exclusion. The fruit of a poisonous tree doctrine is an extension to that law.

Here's one possible scenario: If an illegally conducted electronic discovery (e-discovery) search yields information about corporate espionage, that information cannot be presented as evidence in court, according to the law of exclusion. If other information learned through the search leads investigators to search a public location, where they uncover evidence of another crime, the doctrine of the poisonous tree disqualifies that evidence for presentation in any legal action.

Both the law of exclusion and the fruit of a poisonous tree doctrine were created to discourage law enforcement officials from using illegal activities in efforts to obtain evidence.

 

[about_average]

Sounds eerily similar to the Mueller investigation to me...

So when did you see all the evidence in the possession of the special consul?

Not quite average, crippled by ignorance of the law, evidence already in the public domain, the function of the House Intelligence Committee, comfortably assumes it's findings are mere "opinion" unencumbered by truth, but he forgets this is the Republican majority finding, not the desperate ass covering defense against federal prison time the Democrat minority will be producing.

What part of what you posted do you not understand?
It would seem the part that's "the memo alone".

 

[Sean]

So when did you see all the evidence in the possession of the special consul?

Didn't you know? Tim has 1337 internet skilz. He probably hacked Mueller, the FBI, the WH and Wikileaks.

 

[Que]

So when did you see all the evidence in the possession of the special consul?

What part of what you posted do you not understand?
It would seem the part that's "the memo alone".

There's "evidence" that hasn't leaked? Evidence of what, exactly?

Democrats who have asked to see the evidence have reported that there isn't any "at this time."

Maybe Mueller correctly guages that Democrats cannot be trusted with confidential matters.

 

[Hypoxia]

What is a $90,000 fine and losing a license to practice law? Is that not a finding of wrongdoing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton#Sexual_misconduct_allegations

On January 19, 2001, Clinton's law license was suspended for five years after he acknowledged to an Arkansas circuit court that he had engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice in the Jones case.

Was that a criminal conviction? I'll call that fallout from the impeachment and acquittal. That's Wee Willie. Has any jurisdiction in the world *convicted* the Clintons or their foundation of criminal wrongdoing?

The allegations: THE CLINTONS ARE CROOKS! But no convictions? Feh. Decades of costly investigations have pinned nothing on them. Take a hint.

 

[OldJourno]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton#Sexual_misconduct_allegations Was that a criminal conviction? I'll call that fallout from the impeachment and acquittal. That's Wee Willie. Has any jurisdiction in the world *convicted* the Clintons or their foundation of criminal wrongdoing?

The allegations: THE CLINTONS ARE CROOKS! But no convictions? Feh. Decades of costly investigations have pinned nothing on them. Take a hint.

I stand corrected. The $90,000 "fine" was probably for tickets to the Rotarian of the Year banquet or something. Certainly not for any wrongdoing like perjury, which is not against the law or anything.

 

[Sean]

I stand corrected. The $90,000 "fine" was probably for tickets to the Rotarian of the Year banquet or something. Certainly not for any wrongdoing like perjury, which is not against the law or anything.

He lied about getting a blowjob. Mueller is investigating high treason.

 

[cowslinger64]

He lied about getting a blowjob. Mueller is investigating high treason.

Trump paid off a stripper that he was fucking while his wife was carrying and delivering one of his offspring. He's the president. But let's not think about that, we've got the clintons to worry about.


The gop cocksucks really are pathetic.