Do you think Mueller should be fired?

[about_average]

Well, the Republicans refused to release the Democratic memo. Why would they do such a thing?

As for the dossier, I have long ago posted all of the truths revealed therein. Somehow, folks brushed right over that.

The Dem memo was written by someone who's read the underlying reports. The repub one wasn't.
The Dem memo is being vetted by the FBI and justice, the repub one hasn't been.

In any case, neither are worth squat because they are just someone's opinions, devoid of any real information.

 

[cowslinger64]

What unbelievable lies??



You've never called me on anything......

The one time you tried I skull fucked you with it so hard you've been reduced to 2nd grade name calling ever since.

'Your so stoopid poo poo head 500lb megalomaniac!!'

Over....and over....and over again.

Your entire story is a lie... Filled with bullshit.

Omg.. You need to lay off the crack, my pussy little bitch. You get owned here regularly.. I just play down to your level. Derision, remember?

 

[PollDancer]

Your entire story is a lie... Filled with bullshit.

Omg.. You need to lay off the crack, my pussy little bitch. You get owned here regularly.. I just play down to your level. Derision, remember?

I was looking at your thread history.
Why are you such an obsequious puppy on your home forum ( playground) and such an angry fool when you wander over here?

 

[Aglaopheme]

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/02/trump-russia-indictment-mueller-probe-384969

While many legal experts contend that Mueller lacks the standing to bring criminal charges against Trump, at least two attorneys working with clients swept up in the Russia probe told POLITICO they consider it possible that Mueller could indict the president for obstruction of justice.

Neither attorney claimed to have specific knowledge of Mueller’s plans. Both based their opinions on their understanding of the law; one also cited his interactions with the special counsel’s team, whose interviews have recently examined whether Trump tried to derail the probe into his campaign’s Russia ties.

“If I were a betting man, I’d bet against the president,” said one of the lawyers.

The second attorney, who represents a senior Trump official, speculated that Mueller could try to bring an indictment against Trump even if he expects the move to draw fierce procedural challenges from the president’s lawyers – if only to demonstrate the gravity of his findings.

“It’s entirely possible that Mueller may go that route on the theory that, as an open question, it should be for the courts to decide,” the attorney said. “Even if the indictment is dismissed, it puts maximum pressure on Congress to treat this with the independence and intellectual honesty that it will never, ever get."

 

[TalkRadio]

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/02/trump-russia-indictment-mueller-probe-384969

From your article...

“It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting President for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the President’s official duties,” Starr’s legal adviser, Ronald Rotunda, concluded in a 1998 memo first made public last summer through an open records request by the New York Times. “In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law,” the memo said.

Despite that assertion, Rotunda said in an interview that Mueller cannot indict Trump because he has a different legal standing than Starr enjoyed. Starr’s powers were defined by an independent counsel statute that expired in 1999. Rotunda said Mueller, by contrast, effectively has the powers of a U.S. attorney and must follow all DOJ “rules, regulations, procedures, practices and policies.”

That would mean Mueller is bound by the Clinton Justice Department’s 2000 memo, he said, as well as another Justice Department opinion written in 1973.

“If we know anything about Mueller, we think we know that he follows the rules—all of them,” Paul Rosenzweig, another former Starr deputy, wrote Tuesday in the Atlantic. “Mueller will not indict Trump for obstruction of justice or for any crime. Period. Full stop. End of story. Speculations to the contrary are just fantasy.”

 

[spacekowboy]

It's so cute when you little scamps get your feathers ruffled.*boop*

 

[Aglaopheme]

I understand that a media outlet presenting two differing sides of an argument is hard for you to grasp.

The choice is yours, believe the opinion of those involved in the case, or those that have absolutely nothing to do with it. Yes, all of them are merely opinions, I just happen to find them interesting.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Your entire story is a lie... Filled with bullshit.

Omg.. You need to lay off the crack, my pussy little bitch. You get owned here regularly.. I just play down to your level. Derision, remember?

Moochie McMigraines just wants to argue. Whatever you are for, he's against it, and oh yeah, the Democrats do it tooooooooooo.

Once you realize his mindset, dealing with him is fairly easy. He's like a dumbed-down version of Vetteman.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Your entire story is a lie... Filled with bullshit.

Yeaaa I didn't think you had anything.

Omg.. You need to lay off the crack, my pussy little bitch. You get owned here regularly.

Never as bad as when I posted my DD214/LP's and shut your ass up.

I just play down to your level. Derision, remember?

You don't have any other level beyond name calling.

You have no argumentation skills of any kind and your English skills are those of a beauty school drop out.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Moochie McMigraines just wants to argue. Whatever you are for, he's against it, and oh yeah, the Democrats do it tooooooooooo.

Once you realize his mindset, dealing with him is fairly easy. He's like a dumbed-down version of Vetteman.

Another POG with nothing but name calling in his bag.

 

[cowslinger64]

Another POG with nothing but name calling in his bag.

https://img.aws.livestrongcdn.com/ls-article-image-673/ds-photo/getty/article/110/71/87160465.jpg

 

[cowslinger64]

Yeaaa I didn't think you had anything.



Never as bad as when I posted my DD214/LP's and shut your ass up.



You don't have any other level beyond name calling.

You have no argumentation skills of any kind and your English skills are those of a beauty school drop out.

You got fuckin nothing. You get what you give. For some reason you seem to think that a shitload of words that copy and paste from a dictionary makes you look smart.. well it doesn't. It further shows what a dumbshit you are, and a prolific one at that.

Your dd 214 was a small thing in the grand scheme that is the bullshit story you try to play off here. You talk out your ass, move the goal posts with your opinions (lol) and don't convince anyone of anything, you "win" by attrition because people obviously get tired of battling with the brain dead and give up. That is not a reflection of my arguing skills, just a testament to how ridiculous having any sort of discussion is with you. I've seen it time and time again here, you're called out on your crap, derided for your stupidity and you just keep on and on and on and on and on and on and on....ad nauseum. I have neither the patience, nor the time (which you do, since you are on here all fucking day and night) so I decided long ago not to bother. Take that any way you want..

So fuck off lardass...

 

[cowslinger64]

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) delivered a harsh rebuke against fellow Republicans who agreed to release a memo by House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes against the wishes of the U.S. intelligence community.


Nice to see at least one republican not a complete trump cock suck. Jeezus you people are nuts...

 

[HisArpy]

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) delivered a harsh rebuke against fellow Republicans who agreed to release a memo by House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes against the wishes of the U.S. intelligence community.


Nice to see at least one republican not a complete trump cock suck. Jeezus you people are nuts...

3 points about McCain:

1. He's got brain cancer and is currently unable to conduct his official duties because the drugs he takes for it make his mental acumen untrustworthy.

2. He has a fervent dislike of Trump that he has never bothered to conceal and often lets that color his commentary about Trump's actions.

3. He's well known to be a RHINO.

 

[BobaFetaCheese]

3. He's well known to be a RHINO.

No, I don't think anyone has ever called him a rhino.

 

[HisArpy]

The Dem memo was written by someone who's read the underlying reports. The repub one wasn't.
The Dem memo is being vetted by the FBI and justice, the repub one hasn't been.

In any case, neither are worth squat because they are just someone's opinions, devoid of any real information.

Where do you get your "facts"? Loopiter?

The FBI already issued a statement DAYS AGO that, after reviewing the Nunez memo, they believe it omits critical facts and reveals classified intel and/or methods. (That it doesn't seem to do this casts suspicion on the FBI's other claims in my mind. Especially when THEY are the ones named in the memo. Classic dodge by trying to shift the focus away from the offenders.)

The Dem memo hasn't been released so you don't KNOW what's in it or what the person(s) who wrote it had or hadn't examined.

The Nunez memo isn't an opinion, it's a summary of evidence. You can disagree with it, or choose to interpret it differently than the conclusion at the end, but it's not an "opinion".

The thing about the memo isn't that it points fingers at the DNC, Fusion GPS, Steele as well as Rosenstein and company. It's a bit more complicated than that because of what's left out of the media frenzy.

Item #1 is that the FBI already had Rick Gates on their radar since 2013. He went to work for Trump's campaign in 2016. So we have 3 years of surveillance on this guy BEFORE he joined the campaign.

Item #2 is that Hillary and the DNC paid Fusion to pay Steele to create what we now suspect is more likely than not a phony dossier. It's so obviously phony even Hillary couldn't use the information in it.

Ok, those 2 things seem unrelated. And they normally would be. EXCEPT...

Item #3. Hillary pointed to the dossier she knew was phony and said that TRUMP, not Gates, was the Russian agent. And then the dossier got fed to the FBI to get the warrant and start the surveillance on Trump and his campaign. The existence of the warrant was used as a reason for the Obama administration to unmask members of the transition team.

Up until Hillary pointed her finger at Trump, there was no connection between him and Gates except for Gates being a consultant to the campaign. Ok, so maybe there might be some sort of operation whereby the Russians were trying to use Gates to infiltrate Trump's campaign. But, if there were, that wouldn't make Trump the Ringleader or in league with the Russians. Gates would still be the Russian agent. So it's not Trump, it's Gates. Yet...

Hillary used a phony dossier to point the finger of blame at her political opponent and then had fusion and Steele do the round-about shuffle to feed "confirming evidence" to the media. The FBI then used that fake "confirming evidence" as a basis to substantiate the dossier to the FISA Court.

Conclusion: Hillary used Fusion to create a lie and then used that lie to assert criminal behavior by her political opponent. There is only 1 reason she'd do that - to try and ensure she'd win the election. Otherwise, what's the point to doing it.

 

[HisArpy]

No, I don't think anyone has ever called him a rhino.

Results in .42 seconds...

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/28/john-mccain-traitor-conservative-cause/

https://www.conservativereview.com/top-25-rinos/

http://secretsofthefed.com/rino-john-mccain-censured-republican-party-arizona/

And that's just 3 of the 68,000 results.

 

[Sean]

Results in .42 seconds...

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/28/john-mccain-traitor-conservative-cause/

https://www.conservativereview.com/top-25-rinos/

http://secretsofthefed.com/rino-john-mccain-censured-republican-party-arizona/

And that's just 3 of the 68,000 results.

Not one of those links call McCain a rhino, Tim. I would have thought someone with your awesome internet skilz would have caught that.

 

[HisArpy]

Not one of those links call McCain a rhino, Tim. I would have thought someone with your awesome internet skilz would have caught that.

HAHAHAHAHA! Did you even bother to look at the TITLES in links #2 and #3?

In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny - What a maroon.

 

[Sean]

HAHAHAHAHA! Did you even bother to loot at the TITLE in link #2?

In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny - What a maroon.

Read it again, Tim.

 

[pointless]

*sigh*

https://media.giphy.com/media/3og0INyCmHlNylks9O/giphy.gif

 

[Sean]

*sigh*

https://media.giphy.com/media/3og0INyCmHlNylks9O/giphy.gif

Please, no-one tell him. It's far funnier this way.

 

[HisArpy]

Please, no-one tell him. It's far funnier this way.

You are one of the many reasons I originally decided to not bother posting in this forum. You are stupid, ignorant, and utterly deserve whatever noxious disease has infected your underdeveloped brain.

I shall do better in the future and resist the urge to post in this forum again.

 

[Sean]

You are one of the many reasons I originally decided to not bother posting in this forum. You are stupid, ignorant, and utterly deserve whatever noxious disease has infected your underdeveloped brain.

I shall do better in the future and resist the urge to post in this forum again.

Aw, don't be like that Tim. If you leave we'll have to rely on some other retard for D-K hilarity!

 

[FakeNews]

Results in .42 seconds...

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/28/john-mccain-traitor-conservative-cause/

https://www.conservativereview.com/top-25-rinos/

http://secretsofthefed.com/rino-john-mccain-censured-republican-party-arizona/

And that's just 3 of the 68,000 results.

Not one of those links call McCain a rhino, Tim. I would have thought someone with your awesome internet skilz would have caught that.

Link #1...

The fact is, McCain still wears the Republican pin. And on that score, on Obamacare, he really showed his RINO roots, his leftist leanings.

Link #2...

CR Top 25 Rinos

5 John McCain
Senator from AZ

Link #3...

Arizona Senator John McCain has for years been referred to as a Maverick, as he tends to use both sides of the fence to further his own agendas. However, since his re-election in 2010, McCain has sided more often with his liberal peers in the Senate, and has fully encompassed the label of RINO, meaning he is a Republican in Name Only.