How much more crutch time do some women obviously need to reach socialist equality?

BobBalouski

Literotica Guru
Joined
Dec 8, 2017
Posts
1,127
Oxford University exam times were increased in a bid to improve the low scores of women, it has emerged.

Students taking maths and computer science examinations in the summer of 2017 were given an extra 15 minutes to complete their papers, after dons ruled that "female candidates might be more likely to be adversely affected by time pressure". There was no change to the length or difficulty of the questions.

It was the first time such steps had been taken. In previous years, the percentage of male students awarded first class degrees was double that of women and in 2016 the board of examiners suggested that the department make changes to improve women's grades.

However, despite the intention being to lessen gender discrepancies, the main effect of the time increase appears to have been an increase in the number of 2:1s overall, with 2:2 figures falling. Men continued to be awarded more first class degrees than women in the two subjects.

A university spokesman defended the changes as "academically demanding and fair", and noted that while 39 per cent of female mathematicians achieved first class degrees compared to 47 per cent of men, women's scores had improved year on year...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2018/01/22/oxford-university-gives-women-time-pass-exams/
 

Garbage collectors: A woman drives the truck making weekly trash pickups on our mountain dirt road.

Sewer workers: My sister led mixed teams searching for overnight deaders in NYC subway tunnels.

Miners: I saw women driving heavy equipment in the open-pit copper mine operations in Bisbee AZ.

Office workers: Our office building near San Francisco was evacuated after a skunk intrusion.

Nursing: Most nurses are women. More men need the opportunity to change bedpans and care.
 
How much more crotch time do some men obviously need to be adequately socialized?

Will stroking their loins more induce them to behave better around others?
 
Blah, blah, blah.

Exactly what I think so many times in here. Deep, intelligent discourse is fundamentally a waste of time because in about three seconds it descends into a spiral of willful misinterpretation, people only reading one sentence, taking everything out of context, and refusing to read supporting evidence.

So 'blah blah blah' is where it's at.
 
There are Conservative Feminists?

Let me introduce you to Women For Trump. They proclaimed themselves as feminist because they didn't vote for Clinton just on the basis of her being a woman - that true gender equality means they can support the candidate they want. Or something like that ... it was a slightly confused argument, but they do seem to think they're feminist. So ... yeah.
 
I didn't see there what you claimed was there.

I know a bit more about them than the front page of their website ... but if you scroll down, that is pretty much what they're saying. They proclaimed themselves as feminist elsewhere, in the lead-up to the election. You'll probably just have to trust me on that, as it was in FB posts that'd be impossible to find now ... but really, why would I make that up? It's of no practical value to me to have a bunch of Trump supporters identifying as feminist.
 
Pretty much, not to pick nits, is not the same as saying it. I'm sorry, but if the only way to support your contention is to read between the lines, then your contention is probably not true.
That politician is a member of the KLAN/NAZI! How do you know? Well, he said that minorities are struggling in the current economy and we all know that that is conservative speak for "Aha! We've got them right where we want them!"
 
Back
Top