Collusion investigation getting ready for the smackdown

someoneyouknow

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Posts
28,274
Remember how the con artist told a foreign government to commit espionage against a U.S. citizen?

Remember how Russian hackers stole voter data from several states?

Remember how the con artist campaign was given prior notice when Guccifer 2.0, the nom de guerre of at least one Russian intelligence agency, was about to release emails from Hillary Clinton and Roger Stone, the campaign manager, told Guccifer when to have these releases for maximum effect?

Pepperidge Farm remembers.

That is the crux of a new revelation about the collusion investigation. Specifically, that the Russians gave voter data information to the con artist campaign who in turn helped the Russian trolls target specific demographic and voting precincts.

As Facebook's Chief Counsel related in open testimony, about 25% of the ads purchased by Russians during the election "were geographically targeted," though many analysts have said they find it difficult to believe that foreign entities would have had the kind of granular knowledge of American politics necessary to target specific demographics and voting precincts.

Facebook's general counsel Colin Stretch paused before indicating that the committee had access to intelligence that could better contextualize the information Facebook had turned over.

Investigators have long wondered whether the data-mining and analysis firm Cambridge Analytica served as a link between the campaign's data operation and Russia.

That scrutiny intensified following revelations that Cambridge CEO Alexander Nix reached out to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in June 2016 asking for access to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton's "stolen" emails.

When the House Intelligence Committee sent a letter to Cambridge asking whether his [Brad Parscale] firm received "information from a foreign government or foreign actor" at any point during the election, Parscale responded word for word the same as other data mining firms - with one exception.

Whereas the firms' letters included a line denying that they had had contact with any "foreign government or foreign actor," Parscale's did not.

Even worse, this same firm, and others, were hired by the Republican National Committee to help the con artist's data operation which was being run by the con artist's son-in-law. When pressed how the campaign could so richly target specific areas of the country using Facebook, the lying sack of shit known as Kushner stated:

"I called somebody who works for one of the technology companies that I work with, and I had them give me a tutorial on how to use Facebook micro-targeting."​

http://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-questions-rnc-digital-operation-trump-campaign-russia-2017-12
 
I will be glad when the witch hunt finally ends and Mueller and his minions grudgingly admit there is no evidence of any wrong-doing by the GOP, except for the usual eye-gouging and groin-kicking of politics.
 
It's not about the GOP. It's about the Trump campaign.

It's not a "witch hunt."

What do you have against Robert Mueller? Name one thing that tarnishes his integrity.

If he comes out and exonerates Trump, he'll do it factually and dispassionately, and Dems will accept the outcome. He's done nothing but show professionalism.


I will be glad when the witch hunt finally ends and Mueller and his minions grudgingly admit there is no evidence of any wrong-doing by the GOP, except for the usual eye-gouging and groin-kicking of politics.
 
I will be glad when the witch hunt finally ends and Mueller and his minions grudgingly admit there is no evidence of any wrong-doing by the GOP, except for the usual eye-gouging and groin-kicking of politics.
Members of Team Tromp have already admitted collusion, so your deflection attempt ain't worth dog-gas. Try again.

Oh, and Team Tromp ain't the only receptors of Russian money. Both Gups and Dums should fear scrutiny.
 
Members of Team Tromp have already admitted collusion, so your deflection attempt ain't worth dog-gas. Try again.

Oh, and Team Tromp ain't the only receptors of Russian money. Both Gups and Dums should fear scrutiny.

Cite this alleged collusion. Please.
 
Cite this alleged collusion. Please.

"I will be glad when the witch hunt finally ends and Mueller and his minions grudgingly admit there is no evidence of any wrong-doing by the GOP, "

Cite the evidence that you have the the Mueller investigation is a witch hunt.
 
There's no need to even respond to Box on this. He just takes folks around and around in circles. He has been answered on this repeatedly. It's hard to think that anyone can be this stubbornly stupid . . . but this is Box.
 
"I will be glad when the witch hunt finally ends and Mueller and his minions grudgingly admit there is no evidence of any wrong-doing by the GOP, "

Cite the evidence that you have the the Mueller investigation is a witch hunt.

After all this time, nothing has been found or, at least, nothing has been made public. If there is nothing to be found, it is a witch hunt.
 
After all this time, nothing has been found or, at least, nothing has been made public. If there is nothing to be found, it is a witch hunt.

Do you expect Mueller to hold a daily press conference or release confidential information on twitter?

I expect him to act like a very good seasoned prosecutor and to release information if an when it becomes necessary. That's what professionals do.

If there is no illegal, unethical or evidence of treason why should you or Trump be concerned? The truth shall set him free, right?

There were 9 congressional investigations into Benghazi. Clinton testified for the entire day. Why do you think that Trump is above the law?
 
Do you expect Mueller to hold a daily press conference or release confidential information on twitter?
Desire for "instant gratification" is usually seen as a sign of immaturity. Ah, but Tromp's tweetstorms seem to signal trouble. When he goes into a thumb frenzy, some bad news (for him) usually emerges a few days later. We are about on schedule for further indictments, plea bargains, and smoking guns.

I expect him to act like a very good seasoned prosecutor and to release information if an when it becomes necessary. That's what professionals do.
So far, little has escaped into the jaws of ravening media of any persuasion. Hence all the noise and flash with little substance.

If there is no illegal, unethical or evidence of treason why should you or Trump be concerned? The truth shall set him free, right?
Trompniks are deadly afraid of what will be revealed. That's why they're so frenzied. Who all will be punished for their misdeeds? How many, who have danced for so long with the fuckup fairy, will soon dance with the hangman?

There were 9 congressional investigations into Benghazi. Clinton testified for the entire day. Why do you think that Trump is above the law?
A God-Emperor is by definition above mere secular law and mortal reckoning. Whatever a POTUS does is presidential, hey? Or so Nixon thought.
 
Why do people keep comparing Benghazi to the witch hunt now in progress? The two have nothing in common.

In Benghazi, something very bad happened and blame had to be placed. The Obama administration bungled and looked bad, especially the Sec of State. Since there was an election less that two months later, they began lying like mad to deceive the voters. It worked and Obama was reelected. I still remember Hillary Clinton waving her arms around and asking "Who cares?" Eventually, the truth of her incompetence came out but, by then, the election had been won by the liars.

In the witch hunt now going on, no evidence of any wrong-doing by the object of the hunt has ever been made public, not even after a year and a half. There may have been something, but it has not been made public yet. In fact, the only chicanery noted was on the part of the people who instigated the witch hunt. There has been another election, and that incompetent former secretary lost, so her minions immediately began trying to change the results. I said she lost, not Trump won, if you get the distinction.
 
Why do people keep comparing Benghazi to the witch hunt now in progress? The two have nothing in common.

In Benghazi, something very bad happened and blame had to be placed. The Obama administration bungled and looked bad, especially the Sec of State. Since there was an election less that two months later, they began lying like mad to deceive the voters. It worked and Obama was reelected. I still remember Hillary Clinton waving her arms around and asking "Who cares?" Eventually, the truth of her incompetence came out but, by then, the election had been won by the liars.

In the witch hunt now going on, no evidence of any wrong-doing by the object of the hunt has ever been made public, not even after a year and a half. There may have been something, but it has not been made public yet. In fact, the only chicanery noted was on the part of the people who instigated the witch hunt. There has been another election, and that incompetent former secretary lost, so her minions immediately began trying to change the results. I said she lost, not Trump won, if you get the distinction.

Mueller is one of the most high ranking law enforcement officers in the country. He has an exemplary record. It is common knowledge that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. There is circumstantial evidence that the Trump campaign was in contact with Russian government officials at an extraordinarily high level. Don't you think that it's in the best interest of the country to determine if either political party colluded with a foreign government to influence an election?

Clinton's actions should have been investigated as should the actions of Trump and Co.
 
vastly overwhelming circumstantial evidence. Enough that anyone who isn't a judge in the legal system or isn't conveniently blind can make a correct common-sense call--and wouldn't be posting as Box does on the topic. So, he can easily be just tuned out and we can all wait and see what happens.
 
Last edited:
I suppose if you were important enough for some reason, you'd be told how the investigation is going. You're not important enough and aren't involved as anything but a dogmatic apologist, so they apparently are going to let you wait like the rest of us. While you wait, feel free to sweat.
 
I suppose if you were important enough for some reason, you'd be told how the investigation is going. You're not important enough and aren't involved as anything but a dogmatic apologist, so they apparently are going to let you wait like the rest of us. While you wait, feel free to sweat.

I doubt if any of us are important enough to be privy to whatever info has been uncovered but, after all this time, something relevant should have been made public, if there is anything.

As for Russian hacking of the Dems being "common knowledge," all that means is they were more careless than the GOP, which would be another reason to vote against them.
 
Bullshit. There's no such time schedule/requirement. You're just being a Trump/Fox dupe.

I have to admit you're right about the lack of any time restraints. Mueller may have a lifetime career, continuing even long after the question becomes moot. He may even pass his assignment on to his heirs. That kind of thing is why I said "should" instead of "must."
 
Why are you so scared about this? If you really believed there was nothing there, you wouldn't be propagandizing a porn discussion board about it. You are scared shitless what's there. And that's sad too. Other than showing how bad your judgment is by backing Trump as you have, you have no skin in this game. And you are long past saving your reputation here. Just a bag of fetid air.
 
I have to admit you're right about the lack of any time restraints. Mueller may have a lifetime career, continuing even long after the question becomes moot. He may even pass his assignment on to his heirs. That kind of thing is why I said "should" instead of "must."
You've swallowed the kool-aid. Excellent. You will, of course, put an end to your miserable existence when your God-Emperor is revealed (in a very few months) as the rouble-grubbing traitor he is. To survive his downfall would show disloyalty. You're not disloyal, are you?
 
You've swallowed the kool-aid. Excellent. You will, of course, put an end to your miserable existence when your God-Emperor is revealed (in a very few months) as the rouble-grubbing traitor he is. To survive his downfall would show disloyalty. You're not disloyal, are you?

What's a rouble?
 
Back
Top