Climate continues to change.

[phrodeau]

Trysail posts an opinion piece, then claims a “touchdown.” It must be Thursday.

 

[Luk]

Trysail posts an opinion piece, then claims a “touchdown.” It must be Thursday.

Has he ever engaged in a conversation after one of his dumbass op-ed pieces are disproved or is he like Que in that way? Although Que doesn't have to link a dumbass article to say dumbass shit.

 

[Que]

You do realize that you cannot increase a baby's birth rate unless you do it in utero right?

You've repeatedly demonstrated that you don't give a shit about the collection of cells prior to their natal day. Why pretend you give a shit about women, their babies, and their prenatal health?

The March of Dimes, who unlike you actually does care about women who choose to have babies, provides a lot of information about low birth weight babies and the risks inherent. https://www.marchofdimes.org/complications/low-birthweight.aspx

About 8% of all babies are underweight. That figure rises to 13% for blacks. so unless most of the black women are located near fracking sites I suspect genetics, lifestyle choices and poverty are much bigger factors.

Here's something missing from the study: what was the racial demographics of the subjects studied in the fracking area? Was that area disproportionately black? Hispanic? Native?

What percentage of them were smokers vs.the general population? How about use of legal and illegal drugs? Alcohol?

 

[JohnnySavage]

Top Halliburton executive sips fracking fluid with colleagues in industry show stunt
by Yadullah Hussain
http://business.financialpost.com/2013/10/31/haliburton-fracking-fluid/?__lsa=aeaf-b57f




​

You don't really know that, because what's in the fracking fluid is a trade secret and not subject to public disclosure - even under EPCRA.

I devoted a lot of time and money into getting fracking banned here. But I'm happy to direct the fracking companies to YOUR backyard if you think it's so great.

 

[Luk]

You do realize that you cannot increase a baby's birth rate unless you do it in utero right?

You've repeatedly demonstrated that you don't give a shit about the collection of cells prior to their natal day. Why pretend you give a shit about women, their babies, and their prenatal health?

The March of Dimes, who unlike you actually does care about women who choose to have babies, provides a lot of information about low birth weight babies and the risks inherent. https://www.marchofdimes.org/complications/low-birthweight.aspx

About 8% of all babies are underweight. That figure rises to 13% for blacks. so unless most of the black women are located near fracking sites I suspect genetics, lifestyle choices and poverty are much bigger factors.

Here's something missing from the study: what was the racial demographics of the subjects studied in the fracking area? Was that area disproportionately black? Hispanic? Native?

What percentage of them were smokers vs.the general population? How about use of legal and illegal drugs? Alcohol?

None of this addresses the two articles that I posted that triggered your feeble attacks. You're a googler with too much time on your hands a zero experience or facts to back your shit up.

 

[Que]

Has he ever engaged in a conversation after one of his dumbass op-ed pieces are disproved or is he like Que in that way? Although Que doesn't have to link a dumbass article to say dumbass shit.

"Disproved?"

Wouldn't you have to at least offer a counter argument before you can claim you disproved something?

"Ur a dummy!" does absolutely nothing to advance your argument.

 

[Luk]

You don't really know that, because what's in the fracking fluid is a trade secret and not subject to public disclosure - even under EPCRA.

I devoted a lot of time and money into getting fracking banned here. But I'm happy to direct the fracking companies to YOUR backyard if you think it's so great.

Hush, TweedleDumb and TweedleDumber have *something*.

 

[Luk]

"Disproved?"

Wouldn't you have to at least offer a counter argument before you can claim you disproved something?

"Ur a dummy!" does absolutely nothing to advance your argument.

I've literally never typed those words, liar. Why do you lie so much? Is this what broke your family up - your constant lying/know-it-all bullshit?

 

[Que]

You don't really know that, because what's in the fracking fluid is a trade secret and not subject to public disclosure - even under EPCRA.

I devoted a lot of time and money into getting fracking banned here. But I'm happy to direct the fracking companies to YOUR backyard if you think it's so great.

That is a valid concern. I have no idea what one would want to add to your fracking fluid but I would think some sort of degreasing agent would help bring the desired substances up. Lots of benzene in those. trade secret or not I would support legislation requiring that any and all chemicals used should be disclosed. You don't need to give the percentages but I would think you would need to have some idea what you're using. When we're talking about volatile organics.

 

[trysail]

...dumbass... shit. ⇧

https://i.imgur.com/BeD9aCQ.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/1lYuBIk.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/d3qryz0.jpg

​

 

[Luk]

"Ur a dummy!" does absolutely nothing to advance your argument.

https://i.imgur.com/BeD9aCQ.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/1lYuBIk.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/d3qryz0.jpg

​

What were you attempting to say, little man?

 

[trysail]

liar. Why do you lie so much? Is this what broke your family up - your constant lying/know-it-all bullshit?

https://i.imgur.com/BeD9aCQ.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/1lYuBIk.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/d3qryz0.jpg

​

 

[Que]

None of this addresses the two articles that I posted that triggered your feeble attacks. You're a googler with too much time on your hands a zero experience or facts to back your shit up.

All of that is directly relevant to the subject under discussion which is the causation of low birth weight babies.

The only thing feeble here is your inability to form a cogent thought and advance any valid argument.

 

[JohnnySavage]

That is a valid concern. I have no idea what one would want to add to your fracking fluid but I would think some sort of degreasing agent would help bring the desired substances up. Lots of benzene in those. trade secret or not I would support legislation requiring that any and all chemicals used should be disclosed. You don't need to give the percentages but I would think you would need to have some idea what you're using. When we're talking about volatile organics.

Another problem is that the waste liquids, in addition to extracting the gas, extract and concentrate the Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM). The fracking industry received a ruling from the EPA and NRC that those materials don't need to be disposed of as radioactive. The result is that many of the landfills in Western PA and West Virginia are now radioactive and can no longer be used. Eventually they will be named Superfund sites and the tax payers will have to pay to clean them up - long after the fracking companies have made their bones and moved on.

 

[Luk]

All of that is directly relevant to the subject under discussion which is the causation of low birth weight babies.

The only thing feeble here is your inability to form a cogent thought and advance any valid argument.

This part is totally relevant to my factual links and comments:

About 8% of all babies are underweight. That figure rises to 13% for blacks.

​

Now STFU, liar.

 

[Que]

Another problem is that the waste liquids, in addition to extracting the gas, extract and concentrate the Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM). The fracking industry received a ruling from the EPA and NRC that those materials don't need to be disposed of as radioactive. The result is that many of the landfills in Western PA and West Virginia are now radioactive and can no longer be used. Eventually they will be named Superfund sites and the tax payers will have to pay to clean them up - long after the fracking companies have made their bones and moved on.

that sounds like some money change hands. In mining most of the time they are zero discharge facilities whatever water you use on property has to remain on property.

 

[Que]

This part is totally relevant to my factual links and comments:

​

Now STFU, liar.

I forget sometimes that I can't draw a line from a to c for you without drawing one through b. I did explain it in my post but you're not really going to understand unless I laid out for you point-by-point.

the difference between the general population and black is far more significant than the difference between those that do live near fracking and those that don't. This is highly suggested that there are other factors at work that have nothing to do with environmental contaminants. Environmental contaminants can be concerned but they are not the primary driver to lower birth weight babies.

 

[JohnnySavage]

that sounds like some money change hands. In mining most of the time they are zero discharge facilities whatever water you use on property has to remain on property.

The oil industry got itself an exemption to most environmental regulations through the Oil Pollution Act. The frackers piggy-backed on that.

 

[Luk]

I forget sometimes that I can't draw a line from a to c for you without drawing one through b. I did explain it in my post but you're not really going to understand unless I laid out for you point-by-point.

the difference between the general population and black is far more significant than the difference between those that do live near fracking and those that don't. This is highly suggested that there are other factors at work that have nothing to do with environmental contaminants. Environmental contaminants can be concerned but they are not the primary driver to lower birth weight babies.

No, you just got caught lying and brought black babies into the conversation because you lack the knowledge that you wish you had.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Talkin' loud but ain't sayin' shit.

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

This is highly suggested that there are other factors at work that have nothing to do with environmental contaminants.

No, it isn't.

You suck at being a bullshit artist.

 

[Que]

No, it isn't.

You suck at being a bullshit artist.

You suck at refudiating anything. "No it isn't" is simply a gratuitous assertion. Also known as bullshit.

 

[Luk]

No, it isn't.

You suck at being a bullshit artist.

But black babies.

 

[Que]

No, you just got caught lying and brought black babies into the conversation because you lack the knowledge that you wish you had.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Talkin' loud but ain't sayin' shit.

I think you maybe better go back to the dispensary for a consultation; this version of stoned Luk is sort of angry, stupid, stoned Luk.

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

You suck at refudiating anything. "No it isn't" is simply a gratuitous assertion. Also known as bullshit.

You've shown an inability to recognize or acknowledge any repudiation when it's set in front of your face. There's no point in trying to explain why your assertion is hopelessly wrong.

 

[Que]

But black babies.

Finish the thought. read it again and think really hard.

. . . are 50% more likely than babies in the general population to be underweight. what factors might be at play to account for that and how might this relate to the bullshit study that Luk is so impressed with?

No idea?

I can't say that I am overly surprised by your inability to comprehend the connection.