Moore had better win for the fate of the GOP and the Alt-Right

[adrina]

Funny, that's the exact excusing, pathetic spirit of totally partisan drivel Trump gave justifying voting for Moore yesterday.

And, since your personal take of "they hardly pay in the first place" is, at very best, completely false, allow me to help with the facts of that matter:

http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2015/03/FT_15.03.23_taxesInd.png

The top 10% owns about 76% of the wealth. Perhaps it would be more egalitarian if they paid 76% of the taxes.

 

[Luk]

Reichguide fled faster from this thread than vettebirther fled ISIS.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

I forget who said that "the perfect is the enemy of the good," but 2016 exemplified this point. So many "Bernie or Bust" idiots. Yes, I supported Bernie in the primaries, but then primaries ended, and fair or not, we were stuck with a choice between an experienced stateswoman who had some good and some bad to her or a raving lunatic Twitter and Diet Coke addict who is fond of walking up to strangers and grabbing their genitals. It's not rocket science, especially when he would ban friends of mine from entering the country, deport the families of some of my other friends, and turn over all foreign policy decisions to lackeys of a foreign tyrant.

The "Bernie or Bust" stuff is massively overstated.

Hillary failed to get out the Obama vote. Because she took it for granted and failed to go into the communities and ask for it. That is what cost her the three "blue wall" states.

I voted bernie and the primary and held my nose and voted for HRC in the general but for those that went Bernie -> Trump the real story there is they they voted for Bernie at all. They were newcomers not turncoat Dems.

But why bicker?

Moore lost. For the moment Trump and Bannon are repudiated and between the results in NJ, Virginia and Alabama we see the glimmer of the pendulum swinging back.

It was like when that prick Brown won Kennedy's seat in Massachusetts. It was a sign of the times of GOP momentum. Moore's loss is the same for rational thinking and decorum against hate, bigotry and stupidity!

 

[BobBalouski]

The new Eyer.

Shill extraordinaire.

Yes I could have voted for Jill Stein and absolutely ensured a victory by someone that not only actually committed sexual assault, called his victims liars, threatened to sue them to keep them quiet, continually disrespects women, pushes policies harmful to women and now supports molesters like Roy Moore.

That would have been just swell for women.

Can you possibly explain what instills in you the fantasy that you speak for women in general?

Your logic only functions in the bubble of demagoguery and ideological purity.

Plus, it keeps me from illogically blaming just men for doing the exact horrendous things the woman you voted for President has factually done.

Because HRC made a mistake over 30 years ago.

Women still accuse her husband of rape and assault, and there is other court evidence implicating her husband and her in more, just as hideous offenses against other individuals. She aggressively, viciously acted to silence and discredit those women, something that you perpetually feel the need to only crucify men in general for, and here you are still offering totally repugnant "30 years ago" excuse for her. Has she apologized for viciously acting to silence those women yet? Has she made amends for aggressively acting to discredit them all the ways she did? Why do you not automatically cede all benefit of the doubt to those particular women accusers, and attack their rapist/assaulter and his protector, as you choose to do with others?

In your eyes, what is the difference between their accusations being silenced and discredited and the exact same accusations you proclaim must be heard and given credence to?

I'm glad to see you hold Trump to those very same standards of your ideological stricture.

Speaking of "In your eyes..."

That's a personal problem, how totally one-eyed you subjectively pick to "see" with. No? Here's how I, not your pathetic lying eyes, factually "hold Trump to those very same standards of your ideological stricture":

Anyone who supported either Clinton or Trump presidential bids last fall has absolutely no logical business pontificating about any evils of sexual assault/abuse when they, in fact, voted for it.

Alas, even stone-cold fact/truth can never make a one-eyed wannabe "glad".

And no, there is still no hypocrisy regardless of how you'd like to spin it.

Ain't no spin at all: you pretend to denounce the shameful silencing and discrediting of women accusers, yet you still vote for one of the most notorious silencers and discreditors of women accusers in American history, which is hypocrisy any way your lying eye wishes to see it. Me? I ain't got the ideological stomach to even fantasize of ever voting for such utter, intolerable human stench tagged Trump or Clinton.

You go ahead and keep sucking on your shameful hypocrisy, blatant sexism, and pure political partisanship; I'll just stick to my "bubble of demagoguery", tyvm.

 

[BobBalouski]

The top 10% owns about 76% of the wealth. Perhaps it would be more egalitarian if they paid 76% of the taxes.

Perhaps you should first address the relevant point that "they hardly pay in the first place" before sticking your socialist nose even deeper into individual business not any of your own.

 

[BotanyBoy]

And Republicans managed to not riot, loot and burn down their own neighborhoods after the loss.......imagine that.

 

[richard_daily]

Hillary Clinton's repulsive actions were intentionally committed to protect her man, to silence his many accusers, to discredit them as much as possible. And you voted for her as President, anyway. How do you feel actually voting for what you claim to despise so much, compared to all those Republicans who clearly didn't have the stomach to be like you last night?

Crocodile tears much?

You have this ire for Clinton, but I see you have no bad words for Trump, who by all account has done far worse than Clinton did in regards to sexual conduct.

So you're focusing on Clinton, who has no sexual misconduct of her own (unless you're one of those people dumb enough to believe "pizzagate"), while ignoring the sexual misconduct of Trump.

Why is that?

 

[richard_daily]

Funny, that's the exact excusing, pathetic spirit of totally partisan drivel Trump gave justifying voting for Moore yesterday.

And, since your personal take of "they hardly pay in the first place" is, at very best, completely false, allow me to help with the facts of that matter:

http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2015/03/FT_15.03.23_taxesInd.png

You do realize that your graph shows that the middle class pay most of the taxes, right?

It's basic math.

 

[GuiltyPleasure]

Jones won, Moore's toast.

https://media1.picsearch.com/is?SgUiZNJsvRj2cMsGmSzC4XwGmMCGurcDl_TxOEJ5oNY&height=255​

 

[BotanyBoy]

You do realize that your graph shows that the middle class pay most of the taxes, right?

It's basic math.

What do you consider "middle class" ?

 

[adrina]

Yup. Eyer.

Time is wasted on that one.

 

[BobBalouski]

Crocodile tears much?

You have this ire for Clinton, but I see you have no bad words for Trump, who by all account has done far worse than Clinton did in regards to sexual conduct.

So you're focusing on Clinton, who has no sexual misconduct of her own (unless you're one of those people dumb enough to believe "pizzagate"), while ignoring the sexual misconduct of Trump.

Why is that?

Me? I ain't got the ideological stomach to even fantasize of ever voting for such utter, intolerable human stench tagged Trump or Clinton.

Why is what? That your mother didn't name you Helen Keller?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Yup. Eyer.

Time is wasted on that one.

He tries real good at first, but eventually the seams start showing because he can't hold back the sociopathy that craves to rage in would-be righteousness.

I give this version until the end of January.

 

[BobBalouski]

You do realize that your graph shows that the middle class pay most of the taxes, right?

It's basic math.

Basic math taught me that "51.6%" is always considered "most", but I digress.

The only purpose of posting the graph was to prove the complete fallacy of the original point put forward, that "they hardly pay in the first place", with "they" meaning the infamous "rich". Factually, the graph disproves that assertion. Factual mission accomplished.

Now, whether the rich pay enough taxes according to socialists such as the original poster and yourself is a completely different point. Have fun.

 

[richard_daily]

Why is what? That your mother didn't name you Helen Keller?

So you can't answer the question. Typical of a statist partisan shill.

 

[richard_daily]

Basic math taught me that "51.6%" is always considered "most", but I digress.

The only purpose of posting the graph was to prove the complete fallacy of the original point put forward, that "they hardly pay in the first place", with "they" meaning the infamous "rich". Factually, the graph disproves that assertion. Factual mission accomplished.

Now, whether the rich pay enough taxes according to socialists such as the original poster and yourself is a completely different point. Have fun.

No, that's not actually what the graph proves.

What it proves, is that the middle class are shouldering most of the tax burden.

Too bad your boys fucked the middle class again.

Not that it matters to you, since you're on a fixed income.

 

[adrina]

He tries real good at first, but eventually the seams start showing because he can't hold back the sociopathy that craves to rage in would-be righteousness.

I give this version until the end of January.

You think that long?

 

[Luk]

And Republicans managed to not riot, loot and burn down their own neighborhoods after the loss.......imagine that.

You and your team should be proud.

 

[BobBalouski]

So you can't answer the question.

I stated it before you so stupidly ascribed:

Me? I ain't got the ideological stomach to even fantasize of ever voting for such utter, intolerable human stench tagged Trump or Clinton.

Try clicking your heels together and twirling around around this time?

 

[Luk]

Hey, Eeyore...
Take stand that doesn't just contradict the poster that you've quoted.

 

[Hypoxia]

A slight comparison of MallRat Moore and Wee Willie Clinton:

Wee Willie was known as a cocksman before and during his presidential runs; a plurality (1992) and majority (1996) of voters didn't care that he fucked adults, talked jive, and played saxophone.

The MallRat was long known as a lawless Xian dungheap but his grooming of schoolgirls only reached general notice in the last few weeks. A large majority of white Alabamans forgave him for all that.

In both cases, the wives decided to Stand By Their Men. [cue the steel guitar]
In both cases, results were decided by black voters. [cue the watermelon jokes]

Moral: you can fuck girls and women, but don't fuck with African American voters.

 

[BobBalouski]

No, that's not actually what the graph proves.

What it proves, is that the middle class are shouldering most of the tax burden.

Too bad your boys fucked the middle class again.

Not that it matters to you, since you're on a fixed income.

I simply granted that you had a virtually impossible time just comprehending what others posted, but now I see your mental-handicap extends to all your own typing, too. Can't you get some help for that, or was the lobotomy your last hope?

 

[nowisthetime]

A slight comparison of MallRat Moore and Wee Willie Clinton:

Wee Willie was known as a cocksman before and during his presidential runs; a plurality (1992) and majority (1996) of voters didn't care that he fucked adults, talked jive, and played saxophone.

The MallRat was long known as a lawless Xian dungheap but his grooming of schoolgirls only reached general notice in the last few weeks. A large majority of white Alabamans forgave him for all that.

In both cases, the wives decided to Stand By Their Men. [cue the steel guitar]
In both cases, results were decided by black voters. [cue the watermelon jokes]

Moral: you can fuck girls and women, but don't fuck with African American voters.

Screwing around with some GROWN hussy is not the same as screwing with underage girls or molesting them. And Clinton NEVER pretended to be HOLIER THAN THOU.

Watermelon is actually a very NOURISHING fruit.

 

[Boxlicker101]

A slight comparison of MallRat Moore and Wee Willie Clinton:

Wee Willie was known as a cocksman before and during his presidential runs; a plurality (1992) and majority (1996) of voters didn't care that he fucked adults, talked jive, and played saxophone.

The MallRat was long known as a lawless Xian dungheap but his grooming of schoolgirls only reached general notice in the last few weeks. A large majority of white Alabamans forgave him for all that.

In both cases, the wives decided to Stand By Their Men. [cue the steel guitar]
In both cases, results were decided by black voters. [cue the watermelon jokes]

Moral: you can fuck girls and women, but don't fuck with African American voters.

Actually, Moore didn't get married until he was 38 years old, so the fooling around he did with young women who had reached the age of consent happened when he was single.

 

[sr71plt]

Actually, Moore didn't get married until he was 38 years old, so the fooling around he did with young women who had reached the age of consent happened when he was single.

As far as you know (or are going to say). And you have no way of knowing.

But, here ya go:

“Tina Johnson. Born in 1963. Johnson told AL.com that she was 28 when she visited Moore’s office for a legal issue in 1991. Moore, she says, made several inappropriate comments and, as she was leaving, groped her. He was 44.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ons-against-roy-moore/?utm_term=.ec27632f8499