"The FBI Is In Tatters"

[Rightguide]

Trump's Right — the FBI Is in Tatters (UPDATED)
BY ROGER L SIMON DECEMBER 3, 2017

What're we supposed to think when it's revealed the man running the Hillary Clinton email server investigation (Peter Strzok) was a married Hillary supporter conducting an adulterous affair with a government lawyer, while dissing Donald Trump in his clandestine billet-doux text messages?

(Was he auditioning for Harvey Weinstein's next movie, assuming Weinstein is ever allowed to make a movie again or even would make one that in any way besmirched his good friend Hillary?)

As an FBI agent, Strzok's use of text messaging for such an enterprise was nothing short of moronic in this digital age, but nevertheless he was not fired but simply and quietly sent to FBI "Siberia" last summer, his activities only miraculously coming to public attention last week.

Why the secrecy? Many reasons, probably yet to be determined, but it comes down to this: the FBI, like the Mafia, practices omertà.

They have a code of silence as Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, who spends his life trying to pry information from our supposedly premier law enforcement agency, can tell you. Ditto, now, the House Intelligence Committee, whose chairman Devin Nunes, as Byron York reports for the Washington Examiner, is apoplectic.

The rest and the update here:

https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/trumps-right-fbi-tatters/

 

[adrina]

Jesus Christ do you read anything that isn't bird cage liner?

 

[chillywilly2]

Jesus Christ do you read anything that isn't bird cage liner?

Can you show me anything that isn't bird cage liner??????

 

[KUJACK]

Truth hurts, huh?

Jesus Christ do you read anything that isn't bird cage liner?

This Mueller investigator was fired months ago and covered up

 

[Rightguide]

Jesus Christ do you read anything that isn't bird cage liner?

Please do not try and impeach this source with your leftwing bullshit fact checker. Refute the facts of the article instead.

 

[sr71plt]

The discussion points of an FBI agent emailing support for Hillary Clinton while being on a Hillary Clinton probe are relevant (and that's a serious issue). The folding in of adultery and Weinstein are yellow journalism bird-cage-liner material, which puts the writer on the same level as the FBI agent being exposed for improper behavior. One agent being improper also does not equate to the FBI being in taters--that part is also bird-cage-liner material. But having an attorney general lying and pleading the fifth is an indication the Justice Department is in trouble, if not tatters.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Jesus Christ do you read anything that isn't bird cage liner?

The stench of desperation is strong today, and we know why.

 

[adrina]

Please do not try and impeach this source with your leftwing bullshit fact checker. Refute the facts of the article instead.

Sorry that's not the way it works in reality.

It's not my job to disprove your bullshit when you put forth a questionable source. It's your job, when you put forth a questionable highly partisan source to prove it.

Otherwise it's easily dismissed as the garbage it is.

Unless you want to start quoting the Muppets for news. But then you may actually find some nuggets of truth in there.

The stench of desperation is strong today, and we know why.

Isn't it though.

Look! Shiny object!

 

[about_average]

the FBI Is in Tatters

I'm sure the FBI Director knows more about conditions at the FBI than someone at pjmedia.

This Mueller investigator was fired months ago and covered up

I can understand the FBI reluctance to send information to the committee considering Devin Nunes has shown he's clueless about protecting sensitive information.

 

[bigmane]

Must admit, I like Trump.

At last someone with some balls.

I think a lot don't like him because he says it like it is.

I'd shake his hand.

 

[cowslinger64]

Must admit, I like Trump.

At last someone with some balls.

I think a lot don't like him because he says it like it is.

I'd shake his hand.

Lol... really? It's easy to have balls when you don't have to own anything you say. Kinda like the trolls on this board.


As for "says it like it is".....does that include lie after lie after lie???

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/

 

[MagnusRichard]

All this chitter-chatter, chitter-chatter, chitter-chatter 'bout
Shmatta, shmatta, shmatta, I can't give it away on 7th Avenue
This town's been wearing tatters (shattered, sha ooobie shattered)

 

[sr71plt]

The stench of desperation is strong today, and we know why.

That's it with the Trump dupes/dopes posting here--the stench of desperation. Although it's all intriguing, none of us has an in on what's going on or much of a handle, with the Republicans ruling without an ounce of values/principles, on how this is going to play out. And yet the Lit. GB and Political board Trump dupes/dopes just pile on their desperate attempts to distract and deflect--like maybe bleeding their guts out on a porn discussion board will mean anything.

 

[snugglestruggle]

Sorry that's not the way it works in reality.

It's not my job to disprove your bullshit when you put forth a questionable source. It's your job, when you put forth a questionable highly partisan source to prove it.

Otherwise it's easily dismissed as the garbage it is.

Unless you want to start quoting the Muppets for news. But then you may actually find some nuggets of truth in there.

Isn't it though.

Look! Shiny object!

Which is something you and team D never do, like the Steele dossier


Of course only Team D media sources are credible to you and your ilk.

What was it Botany Boy called you last week? Queen of hipocrisy sitting on a throne in a sugar glass castle? He nailed it .

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Trump's Right — the FBI Is in Tatters (UPDATED)
BY ROGER L SIMON DECEMBER 3, 2017

Mueller is tainted, FBI is in tatters, all news is fake, that isn't Trump on the on 'Access Hollywood' tape, ... because that must be, right?

The alternative would be that Trump really is a lying, cheating, sexist, egotistical, hypocritical bigot who colluded with the Russians for election help in return for lifting sanctions. And then the obstructed justice to cover it up.

 

[bigmane]

Nope. Still I'd shake his hand.

Not going to be dissuaded. I think Trump is all right.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Sha-dooby, tattered, tattered....

 

[RobDownSouth]

Please do not try and impeach this source with your leftwing bullshit fact checker. Refute the facts of the article instead.

It's not a "source", it's an editorial, which you choose to accept as "truth" because it fits your pre-conceived political bias.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Sha-dooby, tattered, tattered....

The crime rate is going up, up, up, up, up!

 

[MagnusRichard]

Pile it up, pile it high on a platter

 

[bigmane]

Can I have a wank, now? I'm horny and didn't get a lady last night.

 

[adrina]

Which is something you and team D never do, like the Steele dossier


Of course only Team D media sources are credible to you and your ilk.

What was it Botany Boy called you last week? Queen of hipocrisy sitting on a throne in a sugar glass castle? He nailed it .

If you say so. But to pair up with Bboy? Really?

Perhaps you'd have legs to stand on if you actually didn't just always attack democrats. Like BBoy. Ironically enough. It's awfully hard to claim neutrality when you're too busy bitching about the splinter in one eye while ignoring the plank in the other.

I don't claim neutrality. I do stand on facts though and the things I post aren't highly biased left wing sources with a reputation for fast and loose with reality. You may not like Vox or Atlantic, but they have well sourced articles based in fact. Reuters and Gallup gets high grades for factual as well as non-biased.

I don't really care what you think. Perhaps you'd like to give more credibility to highly biased right wing sources of "news" that have been repeatedly rated as having a severe issue with the truth. Maybe you should peruse The Blaze, Red State, The Daily Caller etc. I'm sure you'll find your own set of alternative facts that sit better with you.

Have fun. It's your reputation.

 

[Luk]

Must admit, I like Trump. At last someone with some balls.

I'd shake his hand.

Can I have a wank, now? I'm horny and didn't get a lady last night.

You just wanked 45, wanker.

 

[bigmane]

You know that keyboard?

Terrifying weapon ain't it?

 

[sr71plt]

Which is something you and team D never do, like the Steele dossier


Of course only Team D media sources are credible to you and your ilk.

What was it Botany Boy called you last week? Queen of hipocrisy sitting on a throne in a sugar glass castle? He nailed it .

There you go distracting and deflecting again. What you quoted didn't put it in party terms. You've done that to avoid addressing the actual subject.

But . . . Obama . . . but . . . Hillary.

Look! Shiny object! Over there! No, don't look here.