Trump accused of rape

[dominatrixjane]

Trump accused of rape

http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trum...-minor-wife-business-victims-roy-moore-713531

 

[FGB]

Hell bells he's been accused of every other crime under the sun.

I'm surprised he took the time off from killing babies and raping cattle.

This charge is a rerun anyway...

 

[Liar]

Again?

 

[Hypoxia]

Hell bells he's been accused of every other crime under the sun.

I'm surprised he took the time off from killing babies and raping cattle.

This charge is a rerun anyway...

Didn't read the link, eh?

No, he took the time off from bankrupting casinos, defaulting on loans, stealing tips, laundering mafiya money, settling thousands of lawsuits because guilty, bribing officials, and cheating at golf.

And multiple charges previously downplayed are now gaining attention. Times have changed. Rapidly. The suit dropped a year ago because death threats can be revived. Tromp can be compelled to testify under oath... unless he defies court orders and REALLY fires-up a constitutional crisis.

The shit has not yet hit the fan. Stay low.

 

[Wats_butthole]

Hell bells he's been accused of every other crime under the sun.

I'm surprised he took the time off from killing babies and raping cattle.

This charge is a rerun anyway...

Oh right, hes a Republican so he gets a free pass.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Oh right, hes a Republican so he gets a free pass.

More like if they can't prove it, with some really damning and rock fuckin' solid evidence, like a DNA match on a rape kit level of "gotcha!" then this is just another in a very long line of "I HATE TRUMP!!! WAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!" stunts.

IF they can then cool....
https://media1.tenor.com/images/de1b8be35440f34b2d113a428598713c/tenor.gif?itemid=4474410

But all things considered I'm betting they have little more than their word vs his which unfortunately for the "fuck Trump" camp just ain't enough to take generic white trash much less POTUS out.

Want criminal convictions? Prove a crime.

 

[Boxlicker101]

More like if they can't prove it, with some really damning and rock fuckin' solid evidence, like a DNA match on a rape kit level of "gotcha!" then this is just another in a very long line of "I HATE TRUMP!!! WAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!" stunts.

IF they can then cool....
https://media1.tenor.com/images/de1b8be35440f34b2d113a428598713c/tenor.gif?itemid=4474410

But all things considered I'm betting they have little more than their word vs his which unfortunately for the "fuck Trump" camp just ain't enough to take generic white trash much less POTUS out.

Want criminal convictions? Prove a crime.

Besides which, all the charges were related to some other dispute or extortion attempt and all have been dropped.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/11/08/woman-claimed-trump-raped-13-years-old-yeah-made-409631

 

[adrina]

You have got to get better news sources, for fucks sake. Somewhere between their crap factual reporting and ultra right wing bias it's like you feed yourself a steady diet of fast food processed news.

Eugh.

source

Seriously.

Newsweek, while slightly left leaning, at least has a high factual rating.

Their account, which should be given far more weight than the bird cage liner you read:

In 1994, Trump went to a party with Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire who was a notorious registered sex offender, and raped a 13-year-old girl that night in what was a "savage sexual attack," according to a lawsuit filed in June 2016 by "Jane Doe." The account was corroborated by a witness in the suit, who claimed to have watched as the child performed various sexual acts on Trump and Epstein even after the two were advised she was a minor.

"Immediately following this rape Defendant Trump threatened me that, were I ever to reveal any of the details of Defendant Trump’s sexual and physical abuse of me, my family and I would be physically harmed if not killed," Jane Doe wrote in the lawsuit, filed in New York.

The lawsuit was dropped in November 2016, just four days before the election, with Jane Doe's attorneys citing "numerous threats" against her.

Note the difference in reporting: not "she made it all up" but the listing of what her attorneys actually said. Your "news" source injects the verbiage that you want to hear, whereas an actual news source cites what was said on record.

Chrissakes.

 

[Hypoxia]

You have got to get better news sources, for fucks sake. Somewhere between their crap factual reporting and ultra right wing bias it's like you feed yourself a steady diet of fast food processed news.

'Twould be interesting to see where the site gets their money. How many of such toxic sites are funded by a few fascist families? How many manage to straggle by on adverts?

Another angle: The alt.right, baghead, bullshit 'news' world seems consumed with conspiracy theories. The big theory: Satanic evildoers (liberals, antifas, Jews, queers, the literate) are waging a long-term assault on decent, honest, hard-working, faithful 'deplorables', the salt-of-the-earth fascist fundy jeezoids who suffer widespread discrimination and obesity. And addictions.

The honest, non-mainstream, truth-seeking media must of course reveal and fight this conspiratorial assault. They know truth when they see or fabricate it! They spread that truth (or whatever) as far as possible, like a chimp flinging feces at the zoo crowd. "Take THAT!" [big ape-turd slaps MSNBC in the face] "And THAT, and THAT, and THAT!" [ditto for WaPo, NYTimes, USA Today, and their readers]

Of course that crap spreads infinitely. Now we're all drenched in apeshit. Let freedom ring!

 

[BotanyBoy]

Note the difference in reporting: not "she made it all up" but the listing of what her attorneys actually said.

Well.....if her attorneys actually said it, that must make it verified fact!!!

Irrefutable and undeniable because an attorney said so!!!

 

[adrina]

Well.....if her attorneys actually said it, that must make it verified fact!!!

Irrefutable and undeniable because an attorney said so!!!

It is actually what the statement on record is as opposed to a sensationalistic headline by a media outlet source that is known to lie and have an extreme bias. Unless you would prefer to just go with a made-up extremely biased statement.

 

[BotanyBoy]

It is actually what the statement on record is as opposed to a sensationalistic headline by a media outlet source that is known to lie and have an extreme bias. Unless you would prefer to just go with a made-up extremely biased statement.

Irrelevant to anything beyond you not liking their chosen propaganda outlet.

I'm going with reality, I don't care about who's propaganda outlet is the most in line with their partisan buuushit.

Bottom line is if she and her attorneys don't have some DAMN good evidence....something along the lines of a rape kit with a clean chain of custody history and Trumps DNA in it or 3rd party video such as hotel security cams, then they have nothing. Making this a hyped up "WE HATE TRUMP!!! #resist" derpathon.

 

[adrina]

You're going with reality from the reports of a lying ultra right wing website. Groovy.

You've jumped the shark.

Yes attorneys are paid to put things in the best light for their client. All else is simple conjecture and you are being ridiculous.

Go fight with someone that feels like indulging your dumbass bullshit. I'm not that person.

Not everything is about hating Trump.

 

[WoundedKnee]

Is this because Russian collusion is out of the picture?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Is this because Russian collusion is out of the picture?

Picture perfect

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/house-...r-twitter-over-trump-jr-s-wikileaks-messages/

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/16/jared-kushner-wikileaks-emails-245197

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powe...81fd63f174d_story.html?utm_term=.ac382fad8d01

 

[Hypoxia]

Is this because Russian collusion is out of the picture?

Naw, it's just pupating. Wait till it emerges as a butterfly.

 

[MagnusRichard]

Mystery accuser Katie Johnson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpstc9r_esA&feature=youtu.be

 

[BotanyBoy]

You're going with reality from the reports of a lying ultra right wing website. Groovy.

No, just reality.

All the other bullshit is you doing your typical ascription.

Yes attorneys are paid to put things in the best light for their client.

Right....so back to if they don't have proof she's just making shit up.

Not everything is about hating Trump.

LOL who are you trying to sell that pile to sister? Me of yourself? LOL

 

[phrodeau]

Mystery accuser Katie Johnson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpstc9r_esA&feature=youtu.be

Sounds like a dude.

 

[Wats_butthole]

Trump raped a dude? Is that why melania has that perma cunt look on her face?

 

[Hypoxia]

Trump raped a dude? Is that why melania has that perma cunt look on her face?

Well, some of those Thai dickgirls ARE prettier than her.

 

[dominatrixjane]

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/04/frank-rich-roy-cohn-the-original-donald-trump.html

 

[ThatsTheGuy]

How the hell does he manage to do all this when he's so busy running the damned USA and fighting off barbarians at the gates?

 

[Boxlicker101]

How the hell does he manage to do all this when he's so busy running the damned USA and fighting off barbarians at the gates?

Most, maybe all of the unproven allegations are from decades ago. That's partly because most of the current ones have been disproven.

 

[ThatsTheGuy]

Most, maybe all of the unproven allegations are from decades ago. That's partly because most of the current ones have been disproven.

I couldn't find the sarcasm button when I posted that.