Climate continues to change.

[Que]

I don't bother giving serious, well-considered responses to those who promulgate climate science disinformation for the same reasons I don't bother giving serious, well-considered responses to young earth creationists. Figure that out, and you'll have answered your own question.



That's better.

Then why bother responding at all? The truth is you can't respond because you don't know the subject beyond a couple of articles you've read from religious nutcases. You just feel really smart when you gratuitously assert that the other person is wrong. if you can't explain how they are wrong, then you don't know the subject.

The actual Richard P Feynman would be clever, funny, and accurate in his responses and would have no problem whatsoever refuting something that he didn't agree with. You seem to be struggling.

 

[cowslinger64]

ROTFLMFAO

Thank you. You just made my day.

I have always been fairly certain that you knew nothing about climate "science." You just proved beyond any shadow of doubt that you are totally ignorant about the topic.

If you weren't so completely and utterly clueless about the subject, you'd know the answer.


Here's a really big hint:

Find out what Global temperature anomaly (UAH MSU) is.​

http://www.climate4you.com/images/MSU%20UAH%20GlobalMonthlyTempSince1979%20AndCO2.gif


​

Just out of curiosity, what is it that you do for a living and/or what education or qualifications do you have that makes you better equipped to respond than 13 government agencies and numerous scientists specializing in this field?

 

[cowslinger64]

Then why bother responding at all? The truth is you can't respond because you don't know the subject beyond a couple of articles you've read from religious nutcases. You just feel really smart when you gratuitously assert that the other person is wrong. if you can't explain how they are wrong, then you don't know the subject.

Better he talks out of his ass and use a bazillion words like you do?

You're a message board troll, try to get over yourself.

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

ROTFLMFAO

Thank you. You just made my day.

I have always been fairly certain that you knew nothing about climate "science." You just proved beyond any shadow of doubt that you are totally ignorant about the topic.

If you weren't so completely and utterly clueless about the subject, you'd know the answer.


Here's a really big hint:

Find out what Global temperature anomaly (UAH MSU) is.​

http://www.climate4you.com/images/MSU%20UAH%20GlobalMonthlyTempSince1979%20AndCO2.gif


​

Then why bother responding at all? The truth is you can't respond because you don't know the subject beyond a couple of articles you've read from religious nutcases. You just feel really smart when you gratuitously assert that the other person is wrong. if you can't explain how they are wrong, then you don't know the subject.

The actual Richard P Feynman would be clever, funny, and accurate in his responses and would have no problem whatsoever refuting something that he didn't agree with. You seem to be struggling.

Clearly you two would like to stroke each other and cover each other's assholes. I'll leave you to it.

 

[Que]

Clearly you two would like to stroke each other and cover each other's assholes. I'll leave you to it.

Speaking of your fantasies:

You never answered the question posed in your thread on the subject.

Where do you prefer your man to cum on you?

Be sure and let Cowslinger know... Do it soon 'cause he's just about bust a nut for you.

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

Speaking of your fantasies:

You never answered the question posed in your thread on the subject.

Where do you prefer your man to cum on you?

Lost another account did you? How big was your fuck up this time?

 

[cowslinger64]

Speaking of your fantasies:

You never answered the question posed in your thread on the subject.

Where do you prefer your man to cum on you?

Be sure and let Cowslinger know... Do it soon 'cause he's just about bust a nut for you.

You're the one with the massive schoolboy crush. In case that fact escaped the vast emptiness of your humongous head.


Btw.. I know it's hard for you, I wasn't sticking up for that poster.. I was talking to you.

 

[Que]

You're the one with the massive schoolboy crush. In case that fact escaped the vast emptiness of your humongous head.


Btw.. I know it's hard for you, I wasn't sticking up for that poster.. I was talking to you.

Oh, jeeze. All over the floor. . .

I tried to warn him you were close.

~shrug~

I guess "that poster" can slurp it up.

 

[Wats_butthole]

Clearly you two would like to stroke each other and cover each other's assholes. I'll leave you to it.

It's no secret that little queefy enjoys a cock or two from time to time, but I was unaware that trysail was like-minded.

 

[phrodeau]

Hey, dickhead, why does your temperature anomaly only go back to 1980?

It's based on satellite data. That particular dataset has had a few problems with accuracy over the years.

Trysail isn't interested in any data that doesn't support his theory, whatever that is.

 

[Que]

It's based on satellite data. That particular dataset has had a few problems with accuracy over the years.

Trysail isn't interested in any data that doesn't support his theory, whatever that is.

See, "Dick?" This ^^^ was an actual response.

Also, your bro, Phro just threw you under the bus for how stupid your question was. We were hoping to laugh at you a bit longer for posing it.

It was RDS-break-out-the-alt-army to hide his ignominious shame bad.

 

[Hypoxia]

Just out of curiosity, what is it that you do for a living and/or what education or qualifications do you have that makes you better equipped to respond than 13 government agencies and numerous scientists specializing in this field?

We all know that people who closely study stuff either don't know shit or are all tax-grubbing frauds. We should only trust non-experts. If you need brain surgery, see a manicurist. If you want to know about climate (long-term) vs weather (short-term), see a poodle manicurist.

On the interwebz, nobody knows you're a poodle.

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

See, "Dick?" This ^^^ was an actual response.

Also, your bro, Phro just threw you under the bus for how stupid your question was. We were hoping to laugh at you a bit longer for posing it.

It was RDS-break-out-the-alt-army to hide his ignominious shame bad.

It was a rhetorical question, dumbass. Tryfail has posted that same graph numerous times before, each time blatantly disregarding its shortcomings.

 

[Que]

It was a rhetorical question, dumbass. Tryfail has posted that same graph numerous times before, each time blatantly disregarding its shortcomings.

"Hey, dickhead, why does your temperature anomaly only go back to 1980?" is a rather specific question.

What part of that was rhetorical?

 

[cowslinger64]

Oh, jeeze. All over the floor. . .

I tried to warn him you were close.

~shrug~

I guess "that poster" can slurp it up.

You really suck at this.

 

[Que]

You really suck at this.

Thank you for taking the time to provide such insightful commentary.

I value your feedback!

 

[cowslinger64]

Thank you for taking the time to provide such insightful commentary.

I value your feedback!

I've roasted you so many times, I've lost the will to do it much any more. It's like beating up the slow kid over and over.

Hell, you roasted your own self more times than I can remember. Lol

 

[phrodeau]

"Hey, dickhead, why does your temperature anomaly only go back to 1980?" is a rather specific question.

What part of that was rhetorical?

That part.

 

[trysail]

https://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/temperature_fourpanel_d1.png?w=1200&h=


https://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/figure-1-5-sod-annotated3.png

​

 

[OldJourno]

https://realclimatescience.com/2017/11/nasa-arctic-ice-free-and-manhattan-underwater-in-six-weeks/

 

[trysail]

So, you think climate "science" knows what global temperatures were in the recent past?

Think again !!




Density of GHCN-Daily stations with daily maximum and minimum temperature

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/image88.png

Source: http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00103.1



​

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

A proposal for what might be the most inexpensive mode of CO2 sequestration investigated to date. It involves the modification of harvest crops to fix CO2 in root systems.

 

[FGB]

https://www.vox.com/2015/3/23/8277345/atlantic-overturning-circulation


Odd link: https://www.vox.com/cards#E8041386

 

[trysail]

The man has committed frickin' heresy on NPR!!
They'll never let David N. Schwartz on NPR again !!


From NPR's 13.7 Cosmos & Culture:
Commentary on Science and Society

What Would Enrico Fermi Think of Science Today?
by David N. Schwartz
https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2...hat-would-enrico-fermi-think-of-science-today

December 5, 2017

"...At the intersection of science and public policy, on issues like climate change and genetic engineering, Fermi would almost certainly be more reticent. He never enjoyed debating the complex issues of his own day involving science and public policy. He served reluctantly as a government adviser on science policy, but he was always happier in the lab or in the classroom where the physics issues were simpler and answers were either right or wrong.


It's hard to say whether Fermi would be persuaded by the science behind climate change. The models used to simulate climate change are extremely complex and have embedded within them uncertainties that have made some very bright physicists, like Princeton's Freeman Dyson, skeptical of the models themselves..."






​

​

 

[warrior queen]

We just went from a week of 30+ deg C, to 2 days of snow.
Climate is fucking wierd!