Is the Military conducting a review of all discharges?

[neci]

I would like them to please let us know how the internal review is going. Names need to be on lists.

 

[Rightguide]

That's the purpose of the review to comply with existing federal law.

 

[neci]

That's the purpose of the review to comply with existing federal law.

So there is one that has begun?

That's good. I hope they are able to clean house.

 

[neci]

I guess I mean an audit.

 

[neci]

All this talk of clean the swamp. They need to scrub the trenches.

 

[Que]

Better psyche screening on intake would be a good idea.

 

[neci]

Better psyche screening on intake would be a good idea.

This really needs to happen. I knew people who have been broken, never should have been there in the first place. The only option for a boy like that.

 

[richard_daily]

I assume they're reading Lit and will get right on it.

 

[neci]

someone is out there whacking off.

 

[neci]

go throw a pebble into a pond. now throw a bunch of titties into a pond.

 

[Que]

This really needs to happen. I knew people who have been broken, never should have been there in the first place. The only option for a boy like that.

One of the problems is that you actually do want sociopaths, you just don't want straight up psychopaths. There's not always a bright line between the two categories.

You raise a good point that there are people who would likely not respond well to extremes.

My understanding is the way it works now is simply a washout process. You sign up anybody willing to go, tuck tthem into the MOS tthat sounds like they might have a chance at succeeding at and jus let people that can't hack it self-select out.

 

[daimoniotica]

Funny how socialists who love big government so much actually fantasize their big government - especially the very most socialist aspect of it: the military - can POSSIBLY ever be held accountable...

Pentagon Cannot Account For $6.5 Trillion Dollars
https://www.globalresearch.ca/pentagon-cannot-account-for-6-5-trillion-dollars/5541244

Pentagon's Sloppy Bookkeeping Means $6.5 Trillion Can't Pass an Audit
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/...ookkeeping-Means-65-Trillion-Can-t-Pass-Audit

U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, auditor finds
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...llions-of-dollars-auditor-finds-idUSKCN10U1IG

And if you think all that overt unaccountability is bad, ponder how covertly unaccountable the statist deep state factually is (CIA, NSA, DIA, etc, etc, etc).

Socialists fantasizing their statist big government can be held "accountable":

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif

 

[Wats_butthole]

Funny how socialists who love big government so much actually fantasize their big government - especially the very most socialist aspect of it: the military - can POSSIBLY ever be held accountable...

Pentagon Cannot Account For $6.5 Trillion Dollars
https://www.globalresearch.ca/pentagon-cannot-account-for-6-5-trillion-dollars/5541244

Pentagon's Sloppy Bookkeeping Means $6.5 Trillion Can't Pass an Audit
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/...ookkeeping-Means-65-Trillion-Can-t-Pass-Audit

U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, auditor finds
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...llions-of-dollars-auditor-finds-idUSKCN10U1IG

And if you think all that overt unaccountability is bad, ponder how covertly unaccountable the statist deep state factually is (CIA, NSA, DIA, etc, etc, etc).

Socialists fantasizing their statist big government can be held "accountable":

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif

No they aren't looking into vaginal discharges, you're safe.

 

[daimoniotica]

Of course, the OP is the same socialist who just a year or so ago was insisting the US should go to war against Russia to stop Putin, but when asked if she would lead that charge, she held herself out of any such action claiming "artist" status as being just as essential.

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif

Government is a necessary evil, thus the very less government is the absolute best government.

The same can be said for a standing army. Especially when technology and Special Operations are really all that's needed today.

 

[BotanyBoy]

someone is out there whacking off.

To a Maxim magazine with a fuckin white light.....never use white light!

One of the problems is that you actually do want sociopaths, you just don't want straight up psychopaths. There's not always a bright line between the two categories.

You raise a good point that there are people who would likely not respond well to extremes.

My understanding is the way it works now is simply a washout process. You sign up anybody willing to go, tuck tthem into the MOS tthat sounds like they might have a chance at succeeding at and jus let people that can't hack it self-select out.

That’s about right.

Though sociopathy isn’t really a requirement, a willingness to be a cold, hard, wrathful sum bitch upon request is.

 

[neci]

One of the problems is that you actually do want sociopaths, you just don't want straight up psychopaths. There's not always a bright line between the two categories.

You raise a good point that there are people who would likely not respond well to extremes.

My understanding is the way it works now is simply a washout process. You sign up anybody willing to go, tuck tthem into the MOS tthat sounds like they might have a chance at succeeding at and jus let people that can't hack it self-select out.

i know nothing about the current process, or what is involved in mental health screenings. Things like that are always good to review from time to time. No time better than the present. I am sure people have written many an opinion on our current state.

 

[Comshaw]

Is the Military conducting a review of all discharges?
I would like them to please let us know how the internal review is going. Names need to be on lists.

There is a very good reason terms like F-U-B-A-R (Fucked Up Beyond All Repair)come out of the military.



Comshaw

 

[Hypoxia]

If they reviewed mine, they haven't told me.

Of course, that was long ago.

Before Madonna.

 

[about_average]

I would like them to please let us know how the internal review is going. Names need to be on lists.

Probably not so well. The reason he wasn't in the FBI database is because the Air Force dept that handles such things is understaffed. And the OSI knew they were and that records weren't getting uploaded.

Knowing that work needs to be done isn't much use of you don't have and can't get the people to do it.

 

[Aglaopheme]

The government funded a four-year effort beginning in 2008 to try to estimate how many records existed of people who should be barred under federal law from buying a gun but aren't flagged in the FBI system. That effort was abandoned in 2012 because of the cost.



In light of the Texas shooting, Air Force officials have launched an internal review and faulted the staff at an air base for not sending the necessary information to the FBI, but federal officials who work in the database effort say the problem of military nonreporting of domestic violence cases extends far beyond a single base or service branch.

A large number of people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence - who also are prohibited from buying guns - are absent from the FBI database as well, particularly in states that don't require fingerprints for such convictions, according to people involved in the work.

According to FBI records, at the end of last year the Pentagon had exactly one active record for a misdemeanor domestic violence conviction in one of the FBI's main gun background-check databases, though there are two other large databases in which such records could be gathered and for which data was not available. By contrast, the database held nearly 11,000 dishonorable discharge records.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...ck-system-missing-records-20171110-story.html

 

[Hypoxia]

USAF will lose or settle multiple suits.

USA taxpayers will cough-up.

Welcome to our system.