Forum Guidelines Illegal "accusations"? Justice for all but ONE?

Wrmfd

Loves Spam
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Posts
226
Forum Guidelines

2. You may not post...accusations involving...

http://www.literotica.com/support/forum_rules.shtml

It's crystal clear the rules here prohibit such "accusations", so, what do habitual violators keep doing - virtually endlessly - in their attempts to chickenshitingly skirt that ironclad rule?

They intentionally, purposely, and gleefully violate it anyway, imagining blatant insinuation isn't related to "accusation" at all...

Except that it most certainly is, and everyone, including this website's owner - who makes the rules - knows it without anyone else having to inform them of that truth.

Having established those FACTS, allow me to move on to THE OBJECTIVE POINT:

This particular strain of Forum Guidelines INTENTIONAL violation is ONLY wielded against ONE poster, and I cannot even imagine the website owner allowing (for long, anyway) the same blatant insinuation(s) to be used against other posters, or generally among all posters in total...

IT SIMPLY WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED.

So, if the GB is truly ruled fairly, honestly, and equally over all, why is this illegal insinuation only allowed to be used as a classical 3rd-grader weapon on an ADULT Board against just ONE poster?

No?

How quick would that ONE poster be banned if he responded to his attackers with nothing but the exact same flavor of insinuation(s).

Yeah, that's what I fucking thought.
 
You definitely were not hugged enough as a child.

Perhaps you'd have firmer footing to complain if you never intentionally engaged in the behavior you decry.
 
You definitely were not hugged enough as a child.

Perhaps you'd have firmer footing to complain if you never intentionally engaged in the behavior you decry.

wrong! he was hugged WAAAAAAAAY too much as a child probably where his bathing suit covers.
 
So is the above an insinuation of behavior deemed to be against the rules?

That's the second one from the same poster today.

I can't recall if that same poster has been warned before, but at least that is warranted even by loose interpretation.

Of course, if that is allowed to stand AND the other violators are also allowed to continue without warning...

...it simply even more proves THE POINT this thread was created to prove in the first place.

:D
 
Except that it's an insult to pussies.

not necessarily. when someone calls a shitty person a pussy i picture a diseased oozing gash riddled with infection and regret. it's really a perfect insult to that cancerous lesion 4est.
 
That's the second one from the same poster today.

I can't recall if that same poster has been warned before, but at least that is warranted even by loose interpretation.

Of course, if that is allowed to stand AND the other violators are also allowed to continue without warning...

...it simply even more proves THE POINT this thread was created to prove in the first place.

:D

that was actually the 3rd like you should have been aborted at the 3rd trimester.
 
Collateral damage.

Sorry.
:(

Apology accepted. Don't let it happen again. ;)

not necessarily. when someone calls a shitty person a pussy i picture a diseased oozing gash riddled with infection and regret. it's really a perfect insult to that cancerous lesion 4est.

I think a cancerous oozing pustule would be more apt.

Pussies are very nice and very tough things. Both of which the OP and AJ are not.
 
That's the second one from the same poster today.

I can't recall if that same poster has been warned before, but at least that is warranted even by loose interpretation.

Of course, if that is allowed to stand AND the other violators are also allowed to continue without warning...

...it simply even more proves THE POINT this thread was created to prove in the first place.

:D

3 times today...

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=88115937&postcount=12

Amazing if a poster can get away with posting the exact same thing another poster just got banned for the other day?
 
Back
Top