BoyNextDoor
I hate liars
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2010
- Posts
- 14,158
Two years before NFIP was created, the 1966 Presidential Task Force on Federal Flood Control Policy warned that a badly run program “could exacerbate the whole problem of flood losses. For the federal government to subsidize low premium disaster insurance ... would be to invite economic waste of great magnitude.”
The National Wildlife Federation estimated in 1998 that 2% of properties covered by federal flood insurance had multiple damage claims accounting for 40% of flood insurance outlays, and that more than 5,000 homes had repeat claims exceeding their property value.
Who’s paying and who’s benefiting most from flood insurance under the NFIP?
* Louisiana: policyholders paid $4.4 billion in premiums, but collected
$16.7 billion in claims; premiums paid for only onequarter of the
claims.
* Texas: policyholders paid $4.5 billion in premiums but collected
$6.7billioninclaims;premiumspaidforonlytwothirdsoftheclaims.
The NFIP reforms from 5+ years ago were undone 2 years ago by a simpering, pandering Congress.
Also the environmental impact needs to be considered. Please stop.
The National Wildlife Federation estimated in 1998 that 2% of properties covered by federal flood insurance had multiple damage claims accounting for 40% of flood insurance outlays, and that more than 5,000 homes had repeat claims exceeding their property value.
Who’s paying and who’s benefiting most from flood insurance under the NFIP?
* Louisiana: policyholders paid $4.4 billion in premiums, but collected
$16.7 billion in claims; premiums paid for only onequarter of the
claims.
* Texas: policyholders paid $4.5 billion in premiums but collected
$6.7billioninclaims;premiumspaidforonlytwothirdsoftheclaims.
The NFIP reforms from 5+ years ago were undone 2 years ago by a simpering, pandering Congress.
Also the environmental impact needs to be considered. Please stop.