contrifan32
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2005
- Posts
- 3,667
^^^AJ's core philosophy in a nutshell.
You might be able to get a job at CNN
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^^^AJ's core philosophy in a nutshell.
You need to go look at their website...
It is as if you are advocating for them. Soros is funding them for one reason, and one reason only, it's how he makes his wealth, he finances destabilizing elements in every country and then makes currency bets. Antifa is not fighting the Alt-Right, thay are trying to bring down the government.
Soros isn't funding them, you fucking buffoon.
The violence comes at a time when hate groups are experiencing growth and higher prominence. According to research from the Southern Poverty Law Center released earlier this year, 917 hate groups were spread out across the U.S. in 2016 compared to 892 in 2015 and 784 in 2014.
Are they growing? In 2016 the Klan said that it was in the midst of a revival with a "surge in membership across the Deep South".
No, you ambush elected representatives of the opposition on baseball fields and shoot them.
Not that I agree with it, but an argument could be made that politicians pose a threat to safety in that many are actively trying to cause harm to people. The 'defense of others to prevent imminent harm' or however the phrase goes. Wasn't the one guy that got shot seen as sort of an evil dirtbag?
I'd rather take that threat out in the ballot box, but others have more immediate goals.

Not that I agree with it, but an argument could be made that politicians pose a threat to safety in that many are actively trying to cause harm to people. The 'defense of others to prevent imminent harm' or however the phrase goes. Wasn't the one guy that got shot seen as sort of an evil dirtbag?
I'd rather take that threat out in the ballot box, but others have more immediate goals.
You've done it to me.
Here's the deal. In the past we've started threads about the Antifa's violence against conservatives, not all of them Alt-Right, but all of that passed in silence from the same people who are now outraged at the white nationalists. But I'm with Ogg on this one, if the few, the pathetic, the vast hate-wing minority had simply been ignored and their route surrounded by the national guard, then there would have been no opportunity for violence. No media coverage would be nice to, the problem is that the media and the intellectual class have been on a witch-hunt for their war on whites, white privilege, white supremacy and white violence in order to make America more Nihilistic and afraid to say anything, to speak up, to employ free speech.
Now, everyone seems they think they have the absolute proof of this fairy tale and they are making the most of this moment and using an unfortunate death to launch a political crusade. Unlike Islamic terrorism, we see the seeds being sown that everyone who will not engage in this political purge is actually supporting white nationalism, instead of the correct interpretation, we abohor all violence, even the violence of the CTRL_Left.
You're having a conversation with a right wing extremist who doesn't care about the truth, facts, logic or what your actual position is.
Liberals/democrats are his "enemies" and he will twist anything he can to try and "win" some points in his ongoing "war" against them.
Just an FYI.
What is it I'm meant to finding on here that's going to shock me so much?
He's doubling down on Soros is the boogeyman.
Just like he did during the election.
Shhhhhh Pay no attention to these dwindling groups that are killing Americans, and want to take down the government. Drain the swamp!
Here is quite a lot of detail. As you can see, Antifa and their allies were the ones who began the violence. Until that happened, the demonstration was peaceful.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/19685...olence-antifa-charlottesville-robert-kraychik
So I watched this, honestly with an open mind. But really, how is that 'quite a lot of detail' compared to the lengthy narrative I linked to, in which the author quite specifically mentioned also having run ins with AntiFa, suggesting (well, to me anyway) that they weren't overly biased?
That's one minute of video (made by someone who clearly does have a specific allegiance) that could have been shot at any point in the day, focusing on one part of one very specific incident, and it's almost impossible to see, and utterly impossible to hear, what's going on there (and yes, I watched it twice). I'm not seeing this as evidence that AntiFa 'started the violence'.
There's a link within the link, and a lot of narrative. Some of it is from the chief of police of Charlottesville.
Isn't that Donald wearing shades on the left?
What link? All I can see is a link to an extended interview with the woman who shot the original video.
Click on where it says according to
When money is speech, corporate money drowns-out all other voices. Left-behinds can tweet and email and shout hate all they want -- they can't buy the needed media space/time. Best they can hope for is SCOTUS to declare shooting firearms as free speech.The cause of their problems is global capitalism - the ideology that Trump pretty much embodies - not BLM or AntiFa or Jews or anyone else they're choosing to direct their anger at. If they could direct their tiki torches at the right issue, they might have a fighting chance. This isn't really going to help them at all.