Do you check the legality of the clubs you attend?

[MeekMe]

Stories pop up from time to time about "sex clubs" in the news that paint a pretty bad picture. These stories often out people and can sometimes ruin lives. Some clubs are really good about getting all their paperwork straight and even have lawyers to help with contracts for attendees. Sometimes, the want for privacy means the clubs don't file the proper paperwork and end up in the news without much they can do about it.

https://mobile.twitter.com/wsmvnancyamons/status/889892044063289344

This is a recent example. We've also had a member here that had a local issue where a "rival" club vindictively contacted local news and the journalist went undercover and filmed people in the party which made it to their local television report outing members. In the link above people were filmed going to and from the club potentially outing them as well.

So do you make sure you're attending credible places or just hope as business owners they did their due diligence?

 

[Gotham_Central]

http://fox59.com/2017/05/14/undercover-agents-discover-registered-church-is-a-sex-club/


Of the handful of clubs I've been active with, only three have been on-premises clubs and those were membership only venues where liquor was not served, but you could bring your own. That said, I have no idea if they were "legal", as they were by nature very private.

 

[Primalex]

So do you make sure you're attending credible places or just hope as business owners they did their due diligence?

Yes and no.

I cannot make sure anything. But for any place I try to gather information first and let my spidey senses work. Do I spot sloppiness, carelessness, inconsistencies, ...? Then I stay away. I want to see pride and passion.


Edit:
Gotham's example would have triggered my spidey sense - because, if you run a sex club, why do you name it "United Fellowship Center"? The only reason to do this is that you expect trouble and if the owner already expects trouble for whatever reason, how could I come to a different conclusion?

 

[MeekMe]

http://fox59.com/2017/05/14/undercover-agents-discover-registered-church-is-a-sex-club/


Of the handful of clubs I've been active with, only three have been on-premises clubs and those were membership only venues where liquor was not served, but you could bring your own. That said, I have no idea if they were "legal", as they were by nature very private.

The privacy part is usually what starts the issues. Someone wants to be the owner of a club but doesn't want to be known for that. House parties have similar problems. People are gathering at a house for sex in your neighborhood! Find out more at 11.

Yes and no.

I cannot make sure anything. But for any place I try to gather information first and let my spidey senses work. Do I spot sloppiness, carelessness, inconsistencies, ...? Then I stay away. I want to see pride and passion.

Makes sense to me. I imagine most people don't do this though because something being private can often seem shady so they overlook all that stuff.

Edit:
Gotham's example would have triggered my spidey sense - because, if you run a sex club, why do you name it "United Fellowship Center"? The only reason to do this is that you expect trouble and if the owner already expects trouble for whatever reason, how could I come to a different conclusion?

And that's exactly what I mean by "legal." That place wasn't registered as what it actually was and therefore couldn't possibly be running on the up and up with building codes, zoning and such.

 

[Miles Long]

When I joined one of the clubs here I read through all their documents that were part of the membership. Near as I can tell they are doing everything right, but I'm not a lawyer so who knows if I'd really catch anything. They take privacy extremely seriously, so at least there is that. If anyone has tried to fuck them over, like those "undercover" I-Team sham investigations, I am not aware of it.

 

[MistressMoira]

We have two local clubs. The one is an incident waiting to happen. The other is ok. I attend the latter.

 

[Gotham_Central]

We have two local clubs. The one is an incident waiting to happen. The other is ok. I attend the latter.

In the 90s, before a decade of Urban renewal in our state capital, there were two on premises clubs. At one, there were off duty uniform police offices -sometimes city police officer, sometimes sheriff's deputies- at the door (mostly the line) and in the lower level social area / dance floor. This was pretty common at more "popular" dance clubs and I think still is.

They never went to the second floor, where the demonstration stages were, or to the third floor, where the member only areas were. Anyone could get into the lower level, but you had to become a member of the club to access the elevator. The presence of the police offiers leads me to assume the place was "legal".

The other was a "pop up" club. You had to join before going, just to know where to go. The place set up two to three times in any given month, rarely in the same place twice in one month. Always in what seems to have been vacant space rented -maybe?- for the occasion. Not sure that one was legal; in fact I'd almost bet it wasn't.

Still, given the choice of where to go, I'd likely have gone to the second one, just for the "James Bond" sense of the thing. In hindsight, probably a bad idea.

 

[Lascivity]

I don't generally concern myself with the legality of the clubs that I go to. I do satisfy myself that they are safe, and have made at least a token effort to protect the privacy of their members. Those things matter to me. Whether the club has permission from the local authority less so.

 

[fma20fma]

hi

Who goes to legal clubs??guys and gals past 60+??

 

[La damnee elle la licorne]