Con artist progeny "forgot" meeting with Russians

[someoneyouknow]

It is well known the con artist has a penchant for lying. No subject, particularly one about himself, is left untarnished by outright and deliberate lies designed to make it appear the con artist is above reproach.

This genetic propensity seems to have filtered down to the next generation. It has now been revealed the con artist's son and at that time presidential campaign manager Paul Manafort, met with a Russian attorney with direct ties to the Kremlin in the fall of 2016 at the con artist's headquarters in New York, and did not report this meeting as required for his security clearance.

Ostensibly the meeting was about the adoption of Russian children. Specifically the Magnitsky Act. The Act is named after Sergei L. Magnitsky, a lawyer and auditor who died in mysterious circumstances in a Russian prison in 2009 after exposing one of the biggest corruption scandals during Mr. Putin’s rule.

Under the Act, the U.S. has a list of Russians for whom they are allowed to seize their American assets and deny them visas. The United States asserts that many of them are connected to fraud exposed by Mr. Magnitsky. Russian human rights panel found that he had been assaulted. To critics of Mr. Putin, Mr. Magnitsky, in death, became a symbol of corruption and brutality in the Russian state.

This undisclosed meeting raises several questions: why was this meeting held at the con artist's headquarters if, as the con artist's son has said, “I was asked to attend the meeting by an acquaintance, but was not told the name of the person I would be meeting with beforehand.”? Who was this "acquaintance" and why did they have access to the con artist's headquarters for this meeting?

Why was Paul Manafort, then the con artist's campaign manager, even involved with this meeting if it was about adopting Russian children?

How is it possible for both the con artist's son and Manafort to both forget they met with Russians when asked, especially since the schedules of these people are laid out well in advance? Why did it take the con artist's son-in-law revelation of this meeting in his security clearance paperwork, which he also failed to disclose meetings with Russians, for these two to come clean about the meeting?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/08/us/politics/trump-russia-kushner-manafort.html

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40549398

 

[ChloeTzang]

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_scooOttPfI/hqdefault.jpg

 

[sr71plt]

So, are you denying the meeting happened, CT, or are you just being a Trump Dope? You know this makes you look really silly, don't you?

 

[phrodeau]

That club is becoming less exclusive.

AG Jeff Sessions forgot meeting with Kislyak.

Carter Page forgot meeting with Kislyak and Sechin.

Michael Flynn forgot meeting with Kislyak and Putin.

Jared Kushner forgot meeting with Kislyak and Gorkov.

President Trump forgot meeting with Putin.

 

[ChloeTzang]

So, are you denying the meeting happened, CT, or are you just being a Trump Dope? You know this makes you look really silly, don't you?

Seriously, I no longer believe a thing the MSM says about Trump. If they report it, it's no longer credible. There may be something too it, but until Breitbart or Red State or someone else on the alt right covers it, I'm not believing it.

CNN and the rest of the MSM reporting on Trump is like the boy calling Wolf.

https://www.sott.net/image/s18/377217/full/CNN_FAKE_NEWS.png

 

[sr71plt]

Seriously, I no longer believe a thing the MSM says about Trump. If they report it, it's no longer credible.

You just don't want to believe it because you've backed a truly evil man. That's it for you, then. Pretend all you want; it doesn't stop making you stupid on this point.

 

[ChloeTzang]

You just don't want to believe it because you've backed a truly evil man. That's it for you, then. Pretend all you want; it doesn't stop making you stupid on this point.

I kind of like this one myself.

Seriously? He has his flaws, who doesn't, but he's not evil and he stands and speaks for what a lot of us think and will continue to think. Personally I think he's on the right track but not moving fast enough with a lot of stuff, but hey, he's good enough for me. I like what he's done so far and swings and roundabouts, he's win some, he'll lose some. He doesn't have to do a whole heck of a lot to keep my vote.

Not being a Democrat or a RINO is enough for me. The rest is pure bonus.

As for believe? Nope, it's more "I don't give a hoot." Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. Whatever, it's no where near as bad as anything Hillary or Obama or their acolytes did and got away with while in office. Don't care.

https://www.informationliberation.com/files/trump%20on%20war.jpg

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Bwa ha

That's all about as accurate as that big thick rocket launcher he's holding near his crotch.

Nothing makes me laugh harder than the weird freaks thinking the Phallus is going to save them, or that (ha ha ha ha ha ha ha) Trump is the one who "has" it

 

[handysr]

It is well known the con artist has a penchant for lying. No subject, particularly one about himself, is left untarnished by outright and deliberate lies designed to make it appear the con artist is above reproach.

It is well known that all politicians lie and distort the truth. It is well known that you lie and distort the truth. It is well known liberals..... aww fuck it, you get the idea. <yawn> And I'm supposed to get worked up over some disgraced fake news liberal rag? Maybe when they start telling the truth.

So, are you denying the meeting happened, CT, or are you just being a Trump Dope? You know this makes you look really silly, don't you?

Believing anything from cnn makes you look silly.

Hello kettle.

Seriously, I no longer believe a thing the MSM says about Trump. If they report it, it's no longer credible. There may be something too it, but until Breitbart or Red State or someone else on the alt right covers it, I'm not believing it.

CNN and the rest of the MSM reporting on Trump is like the boy calling Wolf.

https://www.sott.net/image/s18/377217/full/CNN_FAKE_NEWS.png

Agreed. Even the "right wing" news posts stuff that is occasionally favorable to liberals or negative to conservatives. When it's rated.
When more than a couple versions of some slanted news agrees with the liberal religion, then I'll believe some of what they write. Basing an argument on one known fake "press" organization is just silly.

It's kind funny how easily the bleeding-heart hateful liberals are misled. All you have to do is accuse Trump or his staff of something and the BHL camp will get their spin engine running.

 

[someoneyouknow]

The question of why Paul Manafort, then the con artist's campaign chairman was at a meeting about adopting Russian children has been answered. All three of the people, con artist, jr., Kushner and Manafort, thought the meeting was going to be about the Russians giving information on Hillary Clinton.

In other words, collusion.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-donald-trump-jr-met-with-russian-lawyer-after-promise-of-clinton-information/

 

[sr71plt]

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_scooOttPfI/hqdefault.jpg

Well, gee, both Kushner and Donald Jr. admit that there was a meeting at which they supposedly were going to be given negative information on Hillary Clinton and that they didn't disclose having met with the Russian lawyer despite several points at which they should have. So, egg on your face about fake news, Chloe. Maybe you should smarten up about reality.

 

[Wrong Element]

Seriously, I no longer believe a thing the MSM says about Trump. If they report it, it's no longer credible. There may be something too it, but until Breitbart or Red State or someone else on the alt right covers it, I'm not believing it.

Uday has basically admitted the gist of the Times story, so you can take your fingers out of your ears and stop yelling "LALALALALA" any time now.

 

[handysr]

Uday has basically admitted the gist of the Times story, so you can take your fingers out of your ears and stop yelling "LALALALALA" any time now.

Think of the source. CNN? Really?

When the liberal crowd starts accepting Breitbart, The Blaze, Daily Caller, etc as legit news sources, then maybe we can talk about the legitimacy of the Right-wing liberal rags. And no, huffpo will never be in that list.

Funny aside: my autocorrect tried to make 'huffpo' into 'buffoon'. Perfect!

 

[someoneyouknow]

Think of the source. CNN? Really?

When the liberal crowd starts accepting Breitbart, The Blaze, Daily Caller, etc as legit news sources, then maybe we can talk about the legitimacy of the Right-wing liberal rags. And no, huffpo will never be in that list.

Funny aside: my autocorrect tried to make 'huffpo' into 'buffoon'. Perfect!

I'm presuming your comment is supposed to be funny because that's how people are going to take it. At least the educated ones.

If you think regurgitating the tripe coming out of the con artist's mouth about CNN, which repeatedly has some of the best coverage of the con artist's corruption and collusion, not to mention is recognized worldwide as one of the industry leaders in news, you aren't making your point.

Those others are truly on the level of the National Enquirer, and one of them in particular has a list of fake news stories, in the truest sense, thick enough to be an encyclopedia.

 

[Wrong Element]

Think of the source. CNN? Really?

When the liberal crowd starts accepting Breitbart, The Blaze, Daily Caller, etc as legit news sources, then maybe we can talk about the legitimacy of the Right-wing liberal rags. And no, huffpo will never be in that list.

Funny aside: my autocorrect tried to make 'huffpo' into 'buffoon'. Perfect!

It was the NY Times, not CNN. And I don't think Breitbart, the Daily Caller, and the Blaze do any actual reporting, which is a pretty significant difference. Even Fox has a traditional news operation outside of the Pravda-like punditry.

But I repeat what I said above: Junior is admitting that he, Manafort, and Kushner had a meeting with a Russian who claimed to have dirt on Hillary. This is after a year's worth of denials that neither he nor anyone else had any such meetings, even though it's now beginning to look like out of the Trump inner circle, only Ivanka, Melania, and Pence (if he even qualifies as "inner circle") never hobnobbed with Putin & co.

That Donny also now claims that they didn't get anything useful (which is certainly possible) is beside the point -- he agreed to the meeting because he was promised dirt. He's in extremely deep shit, and after following his act on Twitter -- he's even less careful than his dad when it comes to endorsing crackpots and bigots -- I have to say I am looking forward to what comes next.

 

[sr71plt]

Well, and (duh) Little Donnie admitted he had the meeting and that he went thinking the Russians were going to give him some dirt on Hillary. His words in the statement his lawyer released. Look it, Trumpettes.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

All this time I thought Trump was trying to hide his shady money laundering for the Russian Mob, but it could be he was trying to protect Beavis & Butthead all along!

Well, and (duh) Little Donnie admitted he had the meeting and that he went thinking the Russians were going to give him some dirt on Hillary. His words in the statement his lawyer released. Look it, Trumpettes.

 

[sr71plt]

Donnie Junior's always good for stepping on his tongue. He's the one who admitted, "Well, sure, the Russians are our family's biggest business partners."

On this new revelation, his cluelessness is hilarious. "Well, I only went to the meeting because the Russians told me they had dirt on Hillary to help my dad's campaign."

One fell swoop and he destroys the disclaimers his dad had been giving for nearly a year.

 

[magicalmoments]

Donnie Junior's always good for stepping on his tongue. He's the one who admitted, "Well, sure, the Russians are our family's biggest business partners."

On this new revelation, his cluelessness is hilarious. "Well, I only went to the meeting because the Russians told me they had dirt on Hillary to help my dad's campaign."

One fell swoop and he destroys the disclaimers his dad had been giving for nearly a year.

Exactly! This is the nub of the matter.

The trumptards need to remember that the longer they leave their heads in the sand the greater the chance they're going to be fucked in the arse.

 

[magicalmoments]

I kind of like this one myself.

Seriously? He has his flaws, who doesn't, but he's not evil and he stands and speaks for what a lot of us think and will continue to think. Personally I think he's on the right track but not moving fast enough with a lot of stuff, but hey, he's good enough for me. I like what he's done so far and swings and roundabouts, he's win some, he'll lose some. He doesn't have to do a whole heck of a lot to keep my vote.

Not being a Democrat or a RINO is enough for me. The rest is pure bonus.

As for believe? Nope, it's more "I don't give a hoot." Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. Whatever, it's no where near as bad as anything Hillary or Obama or their acolytes did and got away with while in office. Don't care.

https://www.informationliberation.com/files/trump%20on%20war.jpg

He may stand and speak for what you believe but it is becoming clearer and clearer that he doesn't believe it himself. He knows that it will bring him support but he doesn't believe a bit of it. Why do you think it's moving so slowly? Because he doesn't want to do it.

 

[ChloeTzang]

Uday has basically admitted the gist of the Times story, so you can take your fingers out of your ears and stop yelling "LALALALALA" any time now.

You didn't get what I was saying did you. It's not LALALALA, it's "really, I don't give a f**k". It's liberal msm "reporting" which may or may not be true, but the msm "reports" mostly fake news these days anyhow so it's only you people that listen, watch or read. You're in a liberal bubble talking to other liberals who all agree with you. Its only when you come somewhere like this that the reality that saw The Donald elected smacks you in the face.

Mostly your media is not our media. Your "news" is irrelevant to us. Your outrage is amusing or inspires derision or anger and hostility. Every time something like this is fawned all over by your media, it simply feeds into Trump's marketing that he's fighting the swamp - doesn't make any difference to us except to continue to convince us that we voted for the right guy.

More like, when you boil down who was involved and their connections, this was some kind of Democrat sting. Just more Democrat corruption and foul play. Now that part of it I do believe because that's been what all of this boils down to all along. When this all shakes out it'll be just like all the other Democrats bullshit. Another non story. Because they have no policy and no viable alternative to slander, name calling and outright lying. The Democrats now are just a collection of diverse special interest groups representing minority's with very little in common. And this is just one more desperate attempt to throw shit.

So read my lips. "I don't give a flying f**k." Hope that helps you understand the irrelevance of your media. We're living in different realities and ours is not yours.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

By "We" I presume you mean all the other voices in your head?

Well, you can call it what you want, but the Fake News has led to some REAL events, like Flynn's firing, Sessions' recusal, and the oh so very real Special Prosecutor.

It's also shackling and harming Trump every day and it just gets worse. That's not fake.

I predict Kushner will be forced out next, I'm sure of it.

Healthcare not passed, no wall, no tax reform, no legislation whatsoever. All real

You didn't get what I was saying did you. It's not LALALALA, it's "really, I don't give a f**k". It's liberal msm "reporting" which may or may not be true, but the msm "reports" mostly fake news these days anyhow so it's only you people that listen, watch or read. You're in a liberal bubble talking to other liberals who all agree with you. Its only when you come somewhere like this that the reality that saw The Donald elected smacks you in the face.

Mostly your media is not our media. Your "news" is irrelevant to us. Your outrage is amusing or inspires derision or anger and hostility. Every time something like this is fawned all over by your media, it simply feeds into Trump's marketing that he's fighting the swamp - doesn't make any difference to us except to continue to convince us that we voted for the right guy.

More like, when you boil down who was involved and their connections, this was some kind of Democrat sting. Just more Democrat corruption and foul play. Now that part of it I do believe because that's been what all of this boils down to all along. When this all shakes out it'll be just like all the other Democrats bullshit. Another non story. Because they have no policy and no viable alternative to slander, name calling and outright lying. The Democrats now are just a collection of diverse special interest groups representing minority's with very little in common. And this is just one more desperate attempt to throw shit.

So read my lips. "I don't give a flying f**k." Hope that helps you understand the irrelevance of your media. We're living in different realities and ours is not yours.

 

[Adre]

Hard to believe but he's dumber than Dad. Shallow end of the gene pool for sure.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

I was duped! I went there to collude and she just wanted to talk about adoption!

Hard to believe but he's dumber than Dad. Shallow end of the gene pool for sure.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

I kind of like this one myself.

Seriously? He has his flaws, who doesn't, but he's not evil and he stands and speaks for what a lot of us think and will continue to think. Personally I think he's on the right track but not moving fast enough with a lot of stuff, but hey, he's good enough for me. I like what he's done so far and swings and roundabouts, he's win some, he'll lose some. He doesn't have to do a whole heck of a lot to keep my vote.

Not being a Democrat or a RINO is enough for me. The rest is pure bonus.

As for believe? Nope, it's more "I don't give a hoot." Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. Whatever, it's no where near as bad as anything Hillary or Obama or their acolytes did and got away with while in office. Don't care.

https://www.informationliberation.com/files/trump%20on%20war.jpg

Chloe is it your position that you hate democrats and liberalism so much that you don't care if Trump colluded with Russia?