California Magazine Ban Blocked

[Disgustipated]

Your prior stupid statement clearly defines you.

Try to dispute what I actually said. If you haven't used something -anything- in 17 years, you probably never will.

 

[RobDownSouth]

In order to help him stop posting crap, he may need a new butt plug as well.

^^There's that fascination with men's body parts and/or bodily fluids. Must be a USMC thing.

 

[hsnh]

^^There's that fascination with men's body parts and/or bodily fluids. Must be a USMC thing.

Nothing could be creepier than your descriptions of your own body fluids.
What you keep telling women: "I want to cum on your pussy lips" and so on… .

 

[contrifan32]

Try to dispute what I actually said. If you haven't used something -anything- in 17 years, you probably never will.

The opening stupid statement by Playdough was "Hi-cap mags have been illegal to sell in CA since 2000. What excuse does a law-abiding gun nut have to still own any?

I asked what about mags that were purchased legally CA prior to 2000.

Yours and his stupidity about anything gun related didn't answer the question that is part of the much larger question. Attempts have been made by some government "officials" to bad certain types of guns or accessories without any thought of the millions of guns and "high capacity" magazines possessed by both legal gun owners and criminals.

Are you under the impression that because a magazine is 17 years old it can no longer be used or that it won't be used ever again?

 

[Disgustipated]

The opening stupid statement by Playdough was "Hi-cap mags have been illegal to sell in CA since 2000. What excuse does a law-abiding gun nut have to still own any?

I asked what about mags that were purchased legally CA prior to 2000.

Yours and his stupidity about anything gun related didn't answer the question that is part of the much larger question. Attempts have been made by some government "officials" to bad certain types of guns or accessories without any thought of the millions of guns and "high capacity" magazines possessed by both legal gun owners and criminals.

Are you under the impression that because a magazine is 17 years old it can no longer be used or that it won't be used ever again?

No. Comprehend my words. If you haven't touched something in 2 decades, you never will.

 

[phrodeau]

*View Post*

It only prohibited the sale of large capacity magazines and grandfathered those already in possession. Prop 63 last November outlaws all possession. Which amounts to a seizure of private property without compensation and aviolation of the Second Amendment.

How is it without compensation? If you're caught with it you pay a hefty fine, so if you get rid of it, you come out ahead.

Melt them down and make spoons out of them. Then you have a practical item to give your heirs.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

This after the present law forced me to buy a pistol that had less than a 10 round magazine capacity.


Federal judge blocks California ban on high-capacity magazines
BY ALEXANDRA YOON-HENDRICKS

A federal judge has temporarily blocked a voter-approved California law that would have forced gun owners to get rid of high-capacity ammunition magazines by this Saturday.

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, who is based in San Diego, issued a preliminary injunction Thursday that found the law was likely unconstitutional because it prevented people from using firearms that employed “whatever common magazine size he or she judges best suits the situation.” The law would have barred people from possessing magazines containing more than 10 bullets.

“The State of California’s desire to criminalize simple possession of a firearm magazine able to hold more than 10 rounds is precisely the type of policy choice that the Constitution takes off the table,” the injunction read.

http://www.sacbee.com/news/state/article158965184.html

When will these activist judges stop legislating from the bench ??

 

[contrifan32]

No. Comprehend my words. If you haven't touched something in 2 decades, you never will.

Again, your words show your stupidity in general and in the case of this discussion. I have a collection of antique glass that I have not touched in 20 years but I will again some day. I also own WWII M1 carbine "high capacity" magazines that I have not needed to use but can and will eventually.

 

[Zeb_Carter]

When will these activist judges stop legislating from the bench ??

When the California Legislature stops crafting unconstitutional laws.

 

[water505]

^^There's that fascination with men's body parts and/or bodily fluids. Must be a USMC thing.

Aren't you the guy always posting about penises?

And maybe it was someone posting under your username today who used the word "poo."

Must be a Rob thing.

You're one badly fucked up dude.

 

[Disgustipated]

Again, your words show your stupidity in general and in the case of this discussion. I have a collection of antique glass that I have not touched in 20 years but I will again some day. I also own WWII M1 carbine "high capacity" magazines that I have not needed to use but can and will eventually.

You'll be dead in 20 years. Most likely from accidentally shooting yourself in the balls cleaning your penis extender.

 

[Lancecastor]

No. Comprehend my words. If you haven't touched something in 2 decades, you never will.

Now i understand why you find fermi attractive.

 

[Que]

No. Comprehend my words. If you haven't touched something in 2 decades, you never will.

What??

Just because in the movies The Hero releases his magazines all over the floor after he shoots more rounds than they contain doesn't mean that they are disposable. They are reloadable. That's the point of a magazine.

The fact that you have a magazine that's 5, 10 or 50 years old doesn't mean it hasn't been used during that time.

 

[Que]

How is it without compensation? If you're caught with it you pay a hefty fine, so if you get rid of it, you come out ahead.

Melt them down and make spoons out of them. Then you have a practical item to give your heirs.

Because you had someting of value, and they are removing it from your lawful ownership. It's called a "taking."

Government doesn't get to do that without compensation no matter how good a liberal idea it is in support of.

Since you never understood the Second Amendment I would be very surprised if you'd ever read the Fifth.

Private property rights are the very foundation of this country. Something that you colectivists don't give a shit about, I realize.

 

[Disgustipated]

Now i understand why you find fermi attractive.

You and Q-#### can fight over who gets to sleep in our wet spot.

Funny how you're now attacking her. Guess you were full of shit a few months ago, lace.

 

[water505]

Disgustupid thinks this thread is about subscription magazines. Don't worry, dude. Nobody will confiscate this week's issue of People from you.

 

[Disgustipated]

Disgustupid thinks this thread is about subscription magazines. Don't worry, dude. Nobody will confiscate this week's issue of People from you.

You {miles} bought your first gun, a Fisher Price, just 2 years ago, dummy.

 

[Rightguide]

When will these activist judges stop legislating from the bench ??

When will the state of California stop violating the Constitution by enacting ex-post facto law?

 

[Que]

You {miles} bought your first gun, a Fisher Price, just 2 years ago, dummy.

How long ago did you purchase the one under the counter? How old are the bullets? You seemed concerned about bullets expiring. How old are the cartridges the bullets are pressed into? Are the primers newer than the brass?

 

[FGB]

Boys and their Toys!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoGRlS53U_k

 

[Disgustipated]

How long ago did you purchase the one under the counter? How old are the bullets? You seemed concerned about bullets expiring. How old are the cartridges the bullets are pressed into? Are the primers newer than the brass?

I never said anything expired you disingenuous simpleton. Your confliction is showing. Just back up off my balls, kid - you don't get a sniff.

 

[Que]

I never said anything expired you disingenuous simpleton. Your confliction is showing. Just back up off my balls, kid - you don't getting a sniff.

"Don't getting?"

It isn't just that you are in rare form today, it's the fact that you're still critiquing other people's sentences when I haven't seen a coherent one out of you today.

Are you back on meth?

 

[Que]

That the rounds are 17 years old and if you haven't spent them by now you never will.

Never mind that one doesn't "spend" rounds, a seventeen-(or 70)-year-old magazine is unlikely to have rounds from seventeen (or 70) years ago. The only way to interpret your idiotic sentence is that if you had "spent" the rounds, the magazine would then have been useless and discarded or worn-out and replaced.

Have you "spent" any of the rounds that came with it since you bought the gun under the counter at the shop? -You had him load it for you, didn't you?

I'm starting to wonder if this belongs in Frodo's "Idiot with a gun" thread.

 

[Disgustipated]

Sorry my typing was bad today - I'm a bit excited. You understand why.

 

[phrodeau]

Because you had someting of value, and they are removing it from your lawful ownership. It's called a "taking."

Government doesn't get to do that without compensation no matter how good a liberal idea it is in support of.

Since you never understood the Second Amendment I would be very surprised if you'd ever read the Fifth.

Private property rights are the very foundation of this country. Something that you colectivists don't give a shit about, I realize.

Are you a tax protestor too? How far in arrears are your property taxes?