Climate continues to change.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Inbred Hillbilies continue to vote against their best interest until it kills them.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


Orange pig promised them the Stars, The Moon, knowing that those coal jobs responsible for increased carbon emissions, will NEVER EVER come back.

Rather than invest in clean and renewable energy, educating the populace in green jobs, which would save their future inbred spawn, they would happily choose to hang on to a fairytale.

They will suffer.


Do I have sympathy?

Not really. Natural selection at its finest.

But they keep believing they are the superior party.

LOL

Reasons A why most red state Americans are failed experiments.
 
The "climate" was 3 degrees hotter in.1990.

The grounded planes are unsafe to operate at that temperature, loaded or not.

Add aerodynamics to the long list of scientific principles you don't understand. Increase airspeed and you increase lift. -at any temperature. Decrease payload and you have sufficient lift at higher temperatures. Because science.

Flight parameters assume the plane has standard payload and a standard length runway. Thor is correct. Reduce payload, or lengthen runway and it lifts off.

Guess what?

What you eroneously call "climate" continues to change as you gain altitude. The temperature drops.
 
Last edited:
The "climate" was 3 degrees hotter in.1990.



Add aerodynamics to the long list of scientific principles you don't understand. Increase airspeed and you increase lift. -at any temperature. Decrease payload and you have sufficient lift at higher temperatures. Because science.

Flight parameters assume the plane has standard payload and a standard length runway. Thor is correct. Reduce payload, or lengthen runway and it lifts off.

Guess what?

What you eroneously call "climate" continues to change as you gain altitude. The temperature drops.

You're one stupid motherfucker.

http://www.businessinsider.com/why-planes-cant-fly-in-extreme-heat-2013-7
 

Hot air is less dense. This affects the output of the engines as well as aerodynamic capabilities, increasing the required runway distance and reducing climb performance. Therefore the amount of passengers and cargo a plane can carry are often restricted when temps are very high.

How much so depends on the temperature, airport elevation and the length of the available runways. And getting off the ground is only part of it: once airborne, planes have to meet specific, engine-out climb criterion, so nearby obstructions like hills and towers are another complication.

As I (and Thor) just said.

Good thing your antique U of G degree did not require any basic physics.
 
As I (and Thor) just said.

Good thing your antique U of G degree did not require any basic physics.

Serious heat can damage a plane's internal components, he explained, which is why some aircraft have maximum operating temperatures.

Nevermind that there's an upper limit for for air temperatures for flight, no matter changing load, runway, etc.

Dumbass.
 
Last edited:
Serious heat can damage a plane's internal components, he explained, which is why some aircraft have maximum operating temperatures.

Nevermind that there's an upper limit for for air temperatures for flight, no matter changing load, runway, etc.

Dumbass.

Three degrees will not damage them. They get a lot hotter than that everytime an APU fails. Avionics are in the cabin which guess what, has air conditioning which is run by an APU while it sits on the runway.

The only substantial difference between the Boeings and Airbuses that can exceed that temperature rating to take off is thrust-to-weight ratio.

The only reason they choose not to fly is that the passenger load reduction would make the flight unprofitable.

...at least you showed some self-awareness when you signed your post.
 
If someone said unicorns are real, QueClavin would wax philosophical about how the species came to be and what an elegant beast the unicorn is. He would tell tales of having a ponyuni as a child and how sad he was when the uni was slaughtered to make Skittles. Or, um, Skiddles.
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/epa-chief-doesnt-think-carbon-161459977.html

EPA chief denies carbon dioxide is main cause of global warming

Soon after moving to slash his agency's budget and staff, Scott Pruitt, the new head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), said on Thursday that he doesn't believe that the human-caused buildup in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations is the primary contributor behind global warming.

These statements go beyond his previous expressions of doubt regarding mainstream climate science findings, and indicate that the person responsible for regulating carbon dioxide does not believe that this pollutant is much of a problem after all. Pruitt's comments put him at odds with the conclusions of his own agency's climate scientists, who have found that carbon dioxide emissions endanger public health and welfare. They also run counter to the findings of climate scientists around the world, who have found that the burning of fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas has vaulted the level of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere to the highest levels in all of human history, and likely longer than that.

Carbon dioxide levels are now above 400 parts per million (ppm), up from the preindustrial level of about 280 ppm.
 
Three degrees will not damage them. They get a lot hotter than that everytime an APU fails. Avionics are in the cabin which guess what, has air conditioning which is run by an APU while it sits on the runway.

The only substantial difference between the Boeings and Airbuses that can exceed that temperature rating to take off is thrust-to-weight ratio.

The only reason they choose not to fly is that the passenger load reduction would make the flight unprofitable.

...at least you showed some self-awareness when you signed your post.

I'm sorry, I didn't realize I was conversing with a total fucktard.

I was told to be gentle with people like you.

Carry on, little tranny soldier.
 
I'm sorry, I didn't realize I was conversing with a total fucktard.

I was told to be gentle with people like you.

Carry on, little tranny soldier.

Quit with the tranny remarks. You want to be labelled a homophobe as well as a drama/troll queen?
 
Excellent news. Maybe those climate "scientists" can find some honest work instead of social engineering driven propaganda.
 
Excellent news. Maybe those climate "scientists" can find some honest work instead of social engineering driven propaganda.

Nobody with any sense or smarts denies human influence on global warming. No international or national body of scientists do. Just fossil fuel profiteers and their lackeys.
 
Nobody with any sense or smarts denies human influence on global warming. No international or national body of scientists do. Just fossil fuel profiteers and their lackeys.

No scientist or propagandist can in any way shape or form quantify the degree to which man is having an impact and anybody who says different is a fucking idiot, milking grant money with NO repeatable results, or both.
 
No scientist or propagandist can in any way shape or form quantify the degree to which man is having an impact and anybody who says different is a fucking idiot, milking grant money with NO repeatable results, or both.

^ Confirmed for stupid.
 
No scientist or propagandist can in any way shape or form quantify the degree to which man is having an impact and anybody who says different is a fucking idiot, milking grant money with NO repeatable results, or both.

Carbon dioxide levels are now above 400 parts per million (ppm), up from the preindustrial level of about 280 ppm.

You got an explanation?! All the Trump lackey at EPA can do is deny that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. A shill for the fossil fuels industry!
 
Inbred Hillbilies continue to vote against their best interest until it kills them.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


Orange pig promised them the Stars, The Moon, knowing that those coal jobs responsible for increased carbon emissions, will NEVER EVER come back.

Rather than invest in clean and renewable energy, educating the populace in green jobs, which would save their future inbred spawn, they would happily choose to hang on to a fairytale.

They will suffer.


Do I have sympathy?

Not really. Natural selection at its finest.

But they keep believing they are the superior party.

LOL

Reasons A why most red state Americans are failed experiments.

So, you ride your bike to work and use candles for light and heat? And I would guess you grow your own food with water you haul from a local creek? And you wipe your ass with what?
 
Carbon dioxide levels are now above 400 parts per million (ppm), up from the preindustrial level of about 280 ppm.

You got an explanation?! All the Trump lackey at EPA can do is deny that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. A shill for the fossil fuels industry!

Of course- burning fossil fuels increases the rate of carbon dioxide.

No one knows what the effect of that will be;anyone who pretends to know what the effect of that will be is a fucking liar how can I make that any more clear?

Climate is very complex. Even basic weather is complex. Carbon dioxide is one of the most minor potential variables.

The only thing that we know for absolute certainty is the effect observed in the lab of how climate would change based on carbon dioxide and has never happened in the real world which means what happens outside the lab is being affected by other systems outside the lab. Those things are unknown. Pretending they're known is idiotic.
 
No scientist or propagandist can in any way shape or form quantify the degree to which man is having an impact and anybody who says different is a fucking idiot, milking grant money with NO repeatable results, or both.
Yes, they can. There are experiments with repeatable results that show that the increased CO2 in the air is caused by burning fossil fuels. Not wood, peat or cattle farts. Exclusively fossil fuels.
 
Yes, they can. There are experiments with repeatable results that show that the increased CO2 in the air is caused by burning fossil fuels. Not wood, peat or cattle farts. Exclusively fossil fuels.

I JUST fucking said that.

Of course- burning fossil fuels increases the rate of carbon dioxide.

No one knows what the effect of that will be;anyone who pretends to know what the effect of that will be is a fucking liar how can I make that any more clear?

Climate is very complex. Even basic weather is complex. Carbon dioxide is one of the most minor potential variables.

The only thing that we know for absolute certainty is the effect observed in the lab of how climate would change based on carbon dioxide and has never happened in the real world which means what happens outside the lab is being affected by other systems outside the lab. Those things are unknown. Pretending they're known is idiotic.



YYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSS burning fossil fuels iiiiiiiiiinnnnnnncccccccrrrrrrreeeeeaaaaaassssseeeeessss. CO2.


To WHAT effect?


NO ONE KNOWS.

Every estimate so far was WRONG by large margins. Which means the answer to that is UNKNOWN.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top