Trump is the reckless, stupid Traitor-in-Chief: LOCK HIM UP!

LOL right.....that must be why it was ok to let Clinton slide on a 10 year felony. :rolleyes:



You didn't hold Clinton or Obama accountable for shit.

Obama was one of the biggest corporate whores ever and Clinton got away with being caught red handed doing something we regularly send poor people to prison for.

Your lot backed it 110% and became the elitist scum they are allegedly against practically destroying the DNC to the point someone like Trump took them down without them seeing it coming.



No you sold out to save your own ass's and now you're trying to hold the big lie together as it all comes crumbling down.

Accountability is an accessory to the real foul which is the point blank lies and pretending.

Go ahead....send another Wall St. (D) in what was it 20k? worth of outfit to lecture the working class on how hard things are, keep promising progress and delivering Monsanto protection acts, ACA and 700k dollar wall st. speaking fees....it's working great for team (D) LOL


Case in fucking point.

Regardless of all the investigations, committees and precedent... You're still on a witch Hunt

Physician, heal thyself
 
Remember my remarks of yesterday?


Small, homogenous and tribal, no matter how rugged you see yourselves as individuals and I can say that with confidence because of the form of government you have chosen. Hell, everyone in my maternal family was an individual, yet they all identified strongly with their tribe(s).

And a strong central government allows you to feel more like an individual because it lessons your reliance on traditions such as family, community and religion. But you still have to answer to your government if you expect it to be there for you should you need it the way "conservative" Americans answer to their family, community and church.

;) ;)

They are not a "luxury" to us that we can do without. They are our rock, our island, our unifying center, not our federal government which we view as a luxury that we can do without because we do, in fact, maintain the strong local institutions that sustain us...
 
No Liberal would dare tarnish their reputation by reading something from the American Thinker.



They do not believe in that kind of political diversity, in fact, they are downright intolerant of it.


:cool:
 
Case in fucking point.

Regardless of all the investigations, committees and precedent... You're still on a witch Hunt

Physician, heal thyself

The precedent is that taking classified materials from the US government gets your ass thrown in prison.

The investigation found that she did indeed violate national security laws.

But no charges because reasons..... like rich elite (D)....LOL

I'm not on a witch hunt because I point out injustice and BLATANT (D) corruption.
 
The precedent is that taking classified materials from the US government gets your ass thrown in prison.

The investigation found that she did indeed violate national security laws.

But no charges because reasons..... like rich elite (D)....LOL

I'm not on a witch hunt because I point out injustice and BLATANT (D) corruption.

Of course you're not. :rolleyes:
 
Of course you're not. :rolleyes:

If I am then explain to me how Clinton, who had numerous classified emails on her private electronic devices isn't in prison with all the military/civilian service members who have done the same or even less.

Explain that to me and I'll buy your side of things.

Till then, Clinton and everyone involved in helping her get over on the law like that is corrupt as the day is long and the people who support it are mindless partisans that will come totally un-fuckin'-glued when Trump commits a BLATANT felony and everyone on team (R) goes "What felony? We own the prosecutor and no charges = no crime!!" like they just did for Clinton.
 
Last edited:
No Liberal would dare tarnish their reputation by reading something from the American Thinker.



They do not believe in that kind of political diversity, in fact, they are downright intolerant of it.


:cool:

Of course not. Reading it immediately turns people into racists.
 
Trump leaked classified information directly to the Russians, in the oval Office, in front of TASS.

Any of you dopes going to defend him now?

More bullshit from the left. The President is the ultimate classification authority in the government. He can classify or declassify anything he pleases, but that said, there is no evidence he disclosed such information other than the alleged statements by anonymous sources.

I see now how your other phony Russian narrative could very well be ready to collapse as well. It seems that Seth Rich's computer has been seized by the police, they are saying he was in contact with Wikileaks, which means he and not the Russians was most likely the inside source releasing DNC emails, as many predicted months ago. The question now is, who in the DNC or the Hillary campaign could have ordered his death?
 
Last edited:
Once again RobNextDoor creates a thread based upon his own ignorance.

Keep up the good work!
 
Last edited:
If I am then explain to me how Clinton, who had numerous classified emails on her private electronic devices isn't in prison with all the military/civilian service members who have done the same or even less.

Explain that to me and I'll buy your side of things.

Till then, Clinton and everyone involved in helping her get over on the law like that is corrupt as the day is long and the people who support it are mindless partisans that will come totally un-fuckin'-glued when Trump commits a BLATANT felony and everyone on team (R) goes "What felony? We own the prosecutor and no charges = no crime!!" like they just did for Clinton.


You're just proving my point. Over and over again.

Election is over but the witch hunt lives on. But it's supposed to be about accountability. Again, regardless of 8 million (whatever) investigations, hearings and whatnot you know better.

We should all be grateful to have you here to explain it to us.

Again: :rolleyes:
 
You're just proving my point. Over and over again.


You keep failing to explain how, over and over again.

Election is over but the witch hunt lives on.

The election has fuck all to do with the fact that she violated national security laws and the (D)'s gave her a pass on it.

And the fact that she did make it not a witch hunt, but a call for justice.

If a poor person goes to prison for it so should Hillary Clinton.

But it's supposed to be about accountability. Again, regardless of 8 million (whatever) investigations, hearings and whatnot you know better.

We should all be grateful to have you here to explain it to us.

Again: :rolleyes:

The investigations found her in violation of the law.

Comeys statement stating as much is STILL on the FBI website.

Again, the question you continue to try and avoid is how come she wasn't charged like non-rich/elite people??

If Steve Bannon or Tillerson got caught at home with tons of stolen classified materials would 'no charges, only sweetheart immunity deals.....because reasons' be good enough for you to be cool with Trump and friends giving him a pass like Obama and friends did for Clinton?

Or would you want him charged and prosecuted just like you would be if you stole a bunch of classified shit from the US government?
 
Last edited:
You keep failing to explain how, over and over again.



The election has fuck all to do with the fact that she violated national security laws.

And the fact that she did make it not a witch hunt, but a call for justice.

If a poor person goes to prison for it so should Hillary Clinton.



The investigations found her in violation of the law.

Again, the question you continue to try and avoid is how come she wasn't charged like non-rich/elite people??


Ahhh here we go. The need to have the obvious spelled out as if that's a debate tactic.

Again: :rolleyes:

Dude, seen your shtick.

Relitigating this all again regardless of it already being done in investigation, in the public and the media is a witch hunt. Over and over again. But hey keep telling yourself - once again - that it was about accountability when that mindset put the least accountable candidate in the race in office.

Sure thing bucky.
 
In other words "I didn't really say what you thought I said."

Another strong candidate for the Oreo/Spidey/Phrodough Doublespeak and Convoluted Logic Award.

May the best man win.


I didn't start the thread, you fucking simpleton.



You know, this morning you look kind of silly because you are attacking Abu Ivanka al-Amriki over something that did not happen according to the other people in the room...


Leaving aside that this administration's credibility gap is the size of Wyoming at this point -- remember a week ago, when everyone's well-crafted cover story about Comey was made inoperative by Trump himself the very next day? -- if you're referring to McMaster's statement yesterday, he very clearly did not contradict the Post's story. He said Trump had not compromised any sources or methods, something the Post never alleged to begin with.



Not that I ever took anyone in the "EMAILS!!!!" crowd seriously, but this is certainly the ultimate proof that none of you guys ever really cared about what was or wasn't revealed in said emails.
 
The Russians say it never happened.



You just want the story to be true because it supports a narrative.


This is why the press is losing credibility and a large part of why you are losing elections.
 
Oh, I didn't check with the horse's mouth before I posted. Trump has apparently been on Twitter this morning, saying in effect, "Yeah, I did it. So fucking what?"



The Russians say it never happened.


Oh, the Russians deny it! Well, that settles it.

After this break: Joseph Goebbels will update us on the glorious progress we're making on the Eastern front.
 
Ahhh here we go. The need to have the obvious spelled out as if that's a debate tactic.

Again: :rolleyes:

Dude, seen your shtick.

Oh so once again you can't actually explain or argue any of your broad sweeping emotional appeals?


Imagine that ;)

this all again regardless of it already being done in investigation, in the public and the media is a witch hunt.

Asking to prosecute a crime someone was caught red handed committing isn't a witch hunt.

Again, the question you continue to try and avoid is how come she wasn't charged like non-rich/elite people??

If Steve Bannon or Tillerson got caught at home with tons of stolen classified materials would 'no charges, only sweetheart immunity deals.....because reasons' be good enough for you to be cool with Trump and friends giving him a pass like Obama and friends did for Clinton?

Or would you scream "white male privilege!!" and wail for him to be charged and prosecuted like all the other progressive Trump haters?

Now be honest....:D
 
Also, I've been watching clips of McMasters on CBS and he very explicitly explained what was discussed and said bluntly that no secrets were shared. The Russians confirmed this. I don't have to believe Trump, but I do believe the General. The Post ran the story without even bothering to confirm it, the old journalistic standard of having two sources, but the abandoned that because it s the story they wanted to print because our national media (as well as some sleeper agents in our intelligence community) is focused, as so any of you seem to be, on the destruction of Trump.

The ironic thing is, y'all believe that he is so inept and incompetent that he will destroy himself, so just give him some rope and be patient already...



But don't hold your breath. I spent the better part of last summer and fall confident that he was going to self-destruct and there he is, in the cat-bird's seat and I'm still wondering how the hell could that happen if it here not from the hubris of the press, the Democrat party and their insistence and belief that Hillary as an undefeatable juggxrnaught who was going to win in a Reaganesque landslide. I still get the sense that most of the left-leaning posters here have yet to recover from the shock and accept the reality...
 
Trump's national security team has generally been spared heavy criticism so far -- the worst thing I've heard about the obviously unqualified Tillerson is that he's out of the loop, which I guess is better than "he's lining his pockets" or "he seems to be a fan of school segregation" or "he wants to throw low-level drug dealers in prison for life."

But now that Trump has sent them all out to lie on his behalf, and cut their legs off a few hours later, they're fucked too.
 
Trump uses his Twitter to bait and enrage his enemies and it clearly works every time.



For all of you that truly believe that he gave away state secrets, he's just trying to chum the water by getting into your face and telling you, now that I'm past the election, I have more flexibility and not only that, but I have the right and privilege to declassify state secrets on a freaking whim...


But, I still believe the general and the Russians over the American Press especially when they run to print with one single unverified source because they want to hurt the President. Everyone thinks that their Deep Throat is going to win them a Pulitzer for taking out a sitting President. The funny thing is that Trump is much closer to their positions on issues than is Mike Pence.
 
Back
Top