Climate continues to change.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rising glacier melt is actually decreasing the amount of water flowing through rivers.

In the summer of 2016, the global warming-induced retreat of Kaskawulsh Glacier — one of the largest glaciers in Canada — altered the flow of its meltwater so substantially that it killed off one river and shunted its waters over to another, an abrupt geological act known as river piracy.

A team of researchers were serendipitously on hand to document the upheaval, which likely marks a permanent change and could have substantial consequences for the ecology and surroundings of both waterways.

While river piracy, or stream capture, is known to have happened in the past because of swings in Earth’s climate, most of those examples were from thousands of years ago. This instance is the first attributed to human-caused climate change.
 

Brought to you by:


The Leo DiCaprio School of Dangerous CO2-caused Anthropogenic Global Warming.




__________________________
( if all else fails, hop in your private jet and fly to protest global warming )



 



"It is ironic that they emphasize 'empirical science', since that’s what argues against global warming being a problem. It’s the 'theoretical science' they have to invoke to scare people."



-Roy W. Spencer, Ph.D.
(comment on climate "science" and The March For Science)​




 


“We’re all victims of the great green swindle”
The Times (London)


“The same mistake is now being made subsidising power stations to burn American wood pellets that are doing more harm to the climate than the coal they replaced, according to a recent Chatham House report. Drax in Yorkshire, once the largest, cleanest, most efficient coal-fired power station in Europe, has been converted to burn wood pellets with an annual £500 million public subsidy but it now pumps out more CO2. Wind farms are little better because we’ve had to build diesel power plants across the country to help on days when the wind doesn’t blow at the right speed.”



 


“We’re all victims of the great green swindle”
The Times (London)


“The same mistake is now being made subsidising power stations to burn American wood pellets that are doing more harm to the climate than the coal they replaced, according to a recent Chatham House report. Drax in Yorkshire, once the largest, cleanest, most efficient coal-fired power station in Europe, has been converted to burn wood pellets with an annual £500 million public subsidy but it now pumps out more CO2. Wind farms are little better because we’ve had to build diesel power plants across the country to help on days when the wind doesn’t blow at the right speed.”



Again you make the erroneous assumption that burning wood is as bad as burning coal. It is not, and maybe you can figure out why.
 
Again you make the erroneous assumption that burning wood is as bad as burning coal. It is not, and maybe you can figure out why.

I'll take a stab: A tree sequesters CO2 as it grows and releases it all when burned -- the net effect on the atmospheric CO2 level is zero. The CO2 would be released anyway as a dead tree decays. But burning fossil fuels releases CO2 that has been sequestered in the ground for millions of years, and when released into the atmosphere is now a new addition, which would not be made if the coal were left in the ground.
 
I'll take a stab: A tree sequesters CO2 as it grows and releases it all when burned -- the net effect on the atmospheric CO2 level is zero. The CO2 would be released anyway as a dead tree decays. But burning fossil fuels releases CO2 that has been sequestered in the ground for millions of years, and when released into the atmosphere is now a new addition, which would not be made if the coal were left in the ground.

In many places, people burn trees faster than new ones can grow. Plus, both trees and coal are stinky.
 
I'll take a stab: A tree sequesters CO2 as it grows and releases it all when burned -- the net effect on the atmospheric CO2 level is zero. The CO2 would be released anyway as a dead tree decays. But burning fossil fuels releases CO2 that has been sequestered in the ground for millions of years, and when released into the atmosphere is now a new addition, which would not be made if the coal were left in the ground.
Correct.
In many places, people burn trees faster than new ones can grow. Plus, both trees and coal are stinky.
Haven't you got some ice giants to deal with?
 
Again you make the erroneous assumption that burning wood is as bad as burning coal. It is not, and maybe you can figure out why.

Perhaps you can illuminate us mere mortals as to how the laws of thermodynamics are modified by some factor based on the fuel.

Idiot.

Ishmael
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top