Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lesse, Assad needs some new airplanes and we need some new missles.
You do have a far great chance of dodging or seeking cover from bullets or shrapnel. Chemical weapons you don't. A decidedly unfair way to wage war. No less gruesome but less fair. Not near as discriminatory either.
Not necessarily a good thing or an improvement! Like the man said "What's so funny about peace, love and understanding."
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39523654
Syria war: US launches missile strikes following chemical 'attack'
The US has carried out a missile attack against targets in Syria in response to a suspected chemical weapons attack on a rebel-held town.
A Pentagon official said about 50 Tomahawk cruise missiles were fired from Navy destroyers in the eastern Mediterranean at a Syrian air base.
It came after US President Donald Trump warned that "something should happen" against the Syrian leadership.
*hopefully no Russians die, would not help situation at all*
Funny, Hillary wanted to impose a no-fly zone. Opponents said it was a bad idea, and would lead to WWIII.
So Trump bombs an air base, leaving Syria's air force without a place to fly to or from. Same thing, or not?
You can "dodge" a 600-2,700 mph bullet?
Those are some quick reflexes.
We just spent 60.6 million dollars to blow up a third-rate country's airfield. I doubt the spent one million building it. What a win for the economy.
The only thing dumber than talking about a "green energy economy" is economic "growth" from wasting assets.
Assad will get new planes from Putin, tomorrow and at no cost.
Hillary would have been President then, fool.
Funny, Hillary wanted to impose a no-fly zone. Opponents said it was a bad idea, and would lead to WWIII.
So Trump bombs an air base, leaving Syria's air force without a place to fly to or from. Same thing, or not?
The USAF covers the planet pretty well.
The Navy launched the missiles, Popeye.
So? How does that concern US?
If you listen to the experts, Assad has little or no control over his units in the field, they are acting pretty much autonomously.
Apparently, there is proof that the planes involved took off from and returned to that airfield.
So when the regime claims that they did not use WMDs, like Susan Rice claiming she did no leaking, they are still operating in the theater of truthiness...
You do understand by now that Fro-DOH! is a semi-functional illiterate...
Over the years, I've seen no proof in his posting that he even graduated from high school.
How many people would have to be murdered before someone stopped them. A million? Three million? Five million?
So? How does that concern US?
Let's see if the dim bulbs can answer this question with a yes or no:
Does the attack make it less likely Syria will use WMD's again?
Even Pelosi and Schumer support Trump on this.
How does it concern us when your ilk wants to let immigrant terrorists in?
10 million, 20 ..., all of them....
Who cares? Not our biddness.
Cops is killin' our own peeps. Let's stop that first.