Hard_Rom
Northumbrian Skald
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2014
- Posts
- 13,623
The courts are corrupt and ideologically driven, like the one in Hawaii.
So is Trump and his cronies!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The courts are corrupt and ideologically driven, like the one in Hawaii.
So is Trump and his cronies!
They're not corrupt unless judges are taking bribes; and judges have been appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents/governors/governments.
Indeed, Trump campaigned on an anti-corruption platform, and has been the single most corrupt person in Washington since the moment he took office.
They are corrupt when they assume authority not granted to them by the Constitution or by statute.
That's not what the word means and they don't do it anyway.
Total bullshit.
Yes they do. That judge in Hawaii just said he can throw out the Constitution, the work of Congress, and assume the be Presidency himself on the basis of how he feels.
You know he's corrupt. His picture belongs in the dictionary next to the word.
No, Obama was corrupt for 8 years. Trump hasn't been in office long enough to corrupt anything except the bowel movements of the left.
What's $3 million in a nation of over 300 million?
I'll lay you dollars to donuts that the various churches and charities do far more than government.
Do you really think corruption has only to do with how long a politician is in office?
Trump can't even get his cabinet into office, let alone have time to become corrupted. Tell me what acts of corruption he's committed.
If Trump's party doesn't want to approve his cabinet Trump should bring it up with his party.
Bribing public officials.
The problem is with Democrats in the Senate.
Show me where Trump bribed a public official, names.
No, it isn't.
Pam Bondi.
What bribe. What's the case number?
The complaint was filed by the Democratic Coalition Against Trump. he was never charged with bribery, and it happened before he was President. So tell me how he corrupted the gov't since being sworn in.
Well how come the Obama DOJ didn't charge him with bribery?
You just called Obama corrupt, you tell me.
Maybe they knew it wouldn't stick.
The Judge indicated in his ruling that his skill as a mind reader to discern the psychological intent . . .
Judges do that all the time and could not do their job if they didn't.
You're out of your mind. If that were true there'd be no need of the law.
I only mean "mind reading" in a metaphorical sense. Intent is an important element in applying the law -- e.g., the killer's state of mind in homicide case can make the difference between murder and manslaughter. Either the judge or the jury has to infer it. Likewise, legislative intent is important in interpretation of statutes.