One World Goverment

Yea or Nah


  • Total voters
    30
  • Poll closed .
All the developed countries have low birth rates. And aging population of baby boomers. Why the fuck do you think we need immigrants? Getting to the point we can't even afford to be too picky over who we let in. Good god damn thing many areas of the world are fucking shitholes or we would be having to offer incentives to attract immigrants.

You want to know when America was great? When it had a birth rate that beat sub-Saharan Africa.

Yeah, get rid of the welfare state. Force folk to have 5-7 kids so they can be assured of one of them supporting them in their old age. Just figure out a way to slip that past aging baby boomer voters who use Medicare and government old age pensions. Good luck, dreamer!
 
The US rate is 1.89. Just an fyi. So the US must be dying too.

It's not social democracy that drives down the birthrate, it's industrialization. The more industrialized a society gets, the more its birthrate declines, it's been observed all over the world since WWII.
 
It's not social democracy that drives down the birthrate, it's industrialization. The more industrialized a society gets, the more its birthrate declines, it's been observed all over the world since WWII.

Social democracy does play a part, IMO. Old days you needed kids for old age support. Industrialization brings consumer goods. Combined with social welfare you can now go out and buy big screen TVs and unwarranted 8cyl pickup trucks.

You will never get dismantling of the welfare state past voters. You will need to do something awfully undemocratic or pray for a natural disaster that puts us back to pre-industrial revolution days. Dreamers!
 
What insane made up fantasy land definition of capitalism are you using? LOL

Try this for starters...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

And please note that I refer to the harms of "unbridled capitalism in its current form," not capitalism per se, which I'm not opposed to.

Here's a quick & easy reference...

http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/capitalism-v-socialism/

Note that capitalism vs socialism is a spectrum, not binary. There are such things as mixed economies with varying degrees of both.
 
it is anathema to first worlders,
frightening to second worlders,
the easy out for third worlders;
to grasp.

... there are many plausible seminal factors that could,
by default,
precipitate the very thing...

so argue it as your particular bias of station may guide you:

still...

the inevitability of just such a thing is only tempered by
whether or not we as a race survive
to this end...

that is what the brilliant gimp was saying.

it is fun to watch the locally tainted gimps
lance at each other
over by-line rather than intellectual consideration...
 
It's not social democracy that drives down the birthrate, it's industrialization. The more industrialized a society gets, the more its birthrate declines, it's been observed all over the world since WWII.

Entirely out of your ass.

Get a grip and stop making theories up.
 
Try this for starters...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

And please note that I refer to the harms of "unbridled capitalism in its current form," not capitalism per se, which I'm not opposed to.


Yea ....."in it's current form" is not really capitalism at all is it??


Note that capitalism vs socialism is a spectrum, not binary.

That's true, but the individual actions of the citizen or the government are binary and not on a spectrum.

There are such things as mixed economies with varying degrees of both.

Right.

And what about the most overpowered police state of all time enforcing regulations over everyone's economic opportunities so that entire markets are held by just a hand full of elite Uber Corps. screams unbridled capitalism to you exactly? :confused:

Sounds like the fuckin' mafia to most people. ;)
 
That does not mean 'industrialization'; that in fact supports the argument against you up there.

What? Industrialization is the first stage of modern economic development. A lot of Third World countries have seen their birthrates drop since they got into it.
 
Yea ....."in it's current form" is not really capitalism at all is it??

That's true, but the individual actions of the citizen or the government are binary and not on a spectrum.

And what about the most overpowered police state of all time enforcing regulations over everyone's economic opportunities so that entire markets are held by just a hand full of elite Uber Corps. screams unbridled capitalism to you exactly? :confused:

Sounds like the fuckin' mafia to most people. ;)

1) Umm, yeah it kinda is, and of the harmful unbridled variety.
2) Some actions binary, others on a spectrum
3) Totalitarian states can be anywhere on the capitalist-socialist spectrum. The Russian Federation is a perfect example of a Mafia State.
 
1) Umm, yeah it kinda is, and of the harmful unbridled variety.

How?

In what sense is the most REGULATED and tightly enforced economy of all fucking time unbridled capitalism?

Unbridled capitalism = laissez faire, libertarianism with NO government regulations or intervention of any kind.

2) Some actions binary, others on a spectrum

No, governments and societies are on a spectrum...individual and government actions are not.

3) Totalitarian states can be anywhere on the capitalist-socialist spectrum.

Not according to the common and all around correct definition of capitalism that you provided and most everyone uses.

A totalitarian state run/regulated economy is anti-capitalistic by every definition under the sun, it's socialism.
 
Last edited:
How?

In what sense is the most REGULATED and tightly enforced economy of all fucking time unbridled capitalism?

In that there's a lot of unbridled shit capitalists can get away with and we live with the consequences every day. That's how the 2008 financial crisis happened (it had far less to do with insolvent home-buyers).
 
As long as you're going to quote him, ask him what role industrialization played in the declining birth rate in the Roman Empire?

Ishmael

You have him on ignore?

He's insidious. His interest is mere endless circular argumentation. He is willing to state any faint logic, fully knowing it doesn't apply, just to compete in an argument.

Nothing is learned that and it makes people confused.
 
All the developed countries have low birth rates. And aging population of baby boomers. Why the fuck do you think we need immigrants? Getting to the point we can't even afford to be too picky over who we let in. Good god damn thing many areas of the world are fucking shitholes or we would be having to offer incentives to attract immigrants.

You want to know when America was great? When it had a birth rate that beat sub-Saharan Africa.

Yeah, get rid of the welfare state. Force folk to have 5-7 kids so they can be assured of one of them supporting them in their old age. Just figure out a way to slip that past aging baby boomer voters who use Medicare and government old age pensions. Good luck, dreamer!

That mostly makes sense.

and the reasons for less birthrates are more complex than that.
 
You have him on ignore?

He's insidious. His interest is mere endless circular argumentation. He is willing to state any faint logic, fully knowing it doesn't apply, just to compete in an argument.

Nothing is learned that and it makes people confused.

That is a problem that exists in your head, not in mine, and not in the real-virtual world of this board. You are one of the most intellectually dishonest posters here.
 
In that there's a lot of unbridled shit capitalists can get away with and we live with the consequences every day. That's how the 2008 financial crisis happened (it had far less to do with insolvent home-buyers).

That does NOT make it unbridled or capitalism.

And the only reason we all had to eat 08' was because the GOVERNMENT FORCED US TO.

Capitalism would have LET THEM BURN and suffer the naturally occurring consequences of their actions.

They couldn't get away with what they are doing without all the help from their friends in the DNC/GOP helping them out. Usually by forcing the 99% to bend over and take it for the team, or writing laws that allow them to give it to the 99% up the ass directly.
 
Last edited:
You have him on ignore?

He's insidious. His interest is mere endless circular argumentation. He is willing to state any faint logic, fully knowing it doesn't apply, just to compete in an argument.

Nothing is learned that and it makes people confused.

For years now.

Ishmael
 
That does NOT make it unbridled or capitalism.

And the only reason we all had to eat 08' was because the GOVERNMENT FORCED US TO.

Capitalism would have LET THEM BURN and suffer the naturally occurring consequences of their actions.

That sounds like something a Communist would say.
 
That is a problem that exists in your head, not in mine, and not in the real-virtual world of this board. You are one of the most intellectually dishonest posters here.

Go jerk off on someone else. You'll find your accusation doesn't hold.

And no my dear, I won't explain to you what you've been desperately trying to have explained since 3 months. :kiss:
 
Back
Top