"Administrative State"?

The "Administrative State" in the context in which I use it is the vast federal bureaucracy. That state of government that is always there regardless of who is elected.
 
So, is "deep state" last week's flavor?
 
King Orfeo's main motivation is to troll.
He's the Busybody of the left, minus the humour.

I and a few others tried to enage him, and all we got from him were condescending one liners ("People who think in any other way that I say are "racists") that had nothing to do with what we said.
 
Last edited:
:rolleyes::)

I might be wrong about him, but I'm still a bit pissed off by his obviously superior manner from the other thread.

No need to get pissed. Just learn to snicker quietly at self-delusion and then proceed to dismantle it.;)
 
And it will always have interests at cross purposes to those of the civil society that employs them. That is the problem.

A government agency is made up of civil servants whose only "interest" is a steady paycheck. That is not at cross purposes with the interests of society.
 
A government agency is made up of civil servants whose only "interest" is a steady paycheck. That is not at cross purposes with the interests of society.

Whenever that government agencies reason for existence is to collect a check instead of providing services.....that's being cross with the interest of society.

It's government mandated high end welfare program for elite welfare recipients that offers the public total shit.

Like our education system LOL what a joke that piece of shit is.
 
Calling attention to something you would rather remain undiscussed is not trolling.
Huh?
So that's why you keep starting all those threads, yet dismiss those who post in them? That's strange.
No need to get pissed. Just learn to snicker quietly at self-delusion and then proceed to dismantle it.;)
Sounds like fun; might do. :)
 
Last edited:
I don't dismiss, I refute.

Oh well, then you might think of doing a better job than generic quotes from Wikipedia or repeating the same "You think differently than I do, therefore you're a racist" regardless of the complexity of their posts.
That's either dismissive and smug on your part, or plain stupid.
 
Like our education system LOL what a joke that piece of shit is.

And yet somehow we are the most powerful economic, military, and cultural force in the world. Not bad for a bunch of poorly educated mooks, huh?
 
A government agency is made up of civil servants whose only "interest" is a steady paycheck. That is not at cross purposes with the interests of society.

It is when the civil society wants budget cuts and a smaller government and then elects somebody who's going to do it.
 
Oh well, then you might think of doing a better job than generic quotes from Wikipedia or repeating the same "You think differently than I do, therefore you're a racist" regardless of the complexity of their posts.

The former is usually adequate to the purpose and I do not do the latter. I might call you a racist because you show signs of being one, but not just because you disagree with me.
 
It is when the civil society wants budget cuts and a smaller government and then elects somebody who's going to do it.

No, it isn't; that's simply a political choice by the voters which they might make for any number of reasons, it is not a reliable sign that the civil servants' interests are at cross purposes with the public's.
 
The former is usually adequate to the purpose and I do not do the latter. I might call you a racist because you show signs of being one, but not just because you disagree with me.

Keep telling yourself that.

The arguments that you claim indicated racism brought up purely economic reasons.
Yet instead of refutting them, as you see yourself as doing, you kept bringing up the same -completely out of place- "racissts" one-liners. Like a broken record.
 
No, it isn't; that's simply a political choice by the voters which they might make for any number of reasons, it is not a reliable sign that the civil servants' interests are at cross purposes with the public's.

Just look at what's happening now. They're busy trying to overthrow the lawfully elected Trump administration because they know what his budget cuts are going to do.
 
Keep telling yourself that.

The arguments that you claim indicated racism brought up purely economic reasons.
Yet instead of refutting them, as you see yourself as doing, you kept bringing up the same -completely out of place- "racissts" one-liners. Like a broken record.

If you mean this thread, you're talking bullshit.
 
Just look at what's happening now. They're busy trying to overthrow the lawfully elected Trump administration because they know what his budget cuts are going to do.

Whatever their motivation, it does not show their interests are at cross purposes with the public's.
 
Every agency provides services.

That doesn't make them a good value or even a benefit.

A lot of them are shit services that are vastly over priced and usually totally unnecessary except for the fact Senator fuckheads bronado needed a contract.

And yet somehow we are the most powerful economic, military, and cultural force in the world. Not bad for a bunch of poorly educated mooks, huh?


We do have a well educated slave force. They can read, write and follow instructions well enough to do slave shit.

Most of our money and power though is held by the privately educated.

Of those who were publicly educated most of them did so at our elite military academies and just a couple of the largest and most prestigious state schools. But they are by far the minority and the list of power players from MLK/JFK high and a U of Whatever degree is even shorter.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top