Boycott Everything Trump Link

[Libsam]

Also, the person who controls the breitbart ban twitter account is anonymous, s/he refuses to reveal their identity.

 

[Adre]

I'm waiting for the acts of true desperation to start, up to and including murder. Rioting, wanton property destruction and arson are already on the table. It's only a matter time before the next steps are taken.

Who would have thought that the home grown terrorists that Obama/Clinton administrations were prepping for would be coming from the 'progressives', not the militias?

Ishmael

You seemed so happy when it was your wingnut team poised to take up arms against the so called opposition. No you seem a little skeered.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Leftists have to politicize everything. They can't be happy unless they're perpetually angry. What a miserable existence.

Except the "left" did not politicize the Nordstrom's rejection of Ivanka's clothing lines. They turn over 10% of their suppliers annually to stay fresh and it is based on sales and performance and her line failed the test. #TheOrangutang politicized it.

Worse, he used the Office of the President for direct personal economic benefit for him and his family. It is not America First with this guy - it is Trump First.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Sorry, but I saw some tweets out of Nordstrom's that strongly indicated that this was a political decision due to the anger of many of their shoppers.


The bullshit about normal turnover was just that, bullshit, especially in the light of what LadyF posted.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

As far as lashing out against companies and business, no Democrat really squawked whenever President Obama did it anymore than any Democrat squawked when he attacked the SCOTUS during the State of the Union address...

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Sorry, but I saw some tweets out of Nordstrom's that strongly indicated that this was a political decision due to the anger of many of their shoppers.


The bullshit about normal turnover was just that, bullshit, especially in the light of what LadyF posted.

Bullshit.

Who is "LadyF"?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

It was not a tweet. It was a memo

Yet, while the luxury department store chain says there were no political motives involved, on January 30, just days prior to the announcement, the company’s three presidents sent a memo to employees addressing President Trump’s executive order on immigration, as first reported by Seattle newspaper The Stranger.

“Last Friday an Executive Order was signed by the President of the United States related to immigration. This subject is one we're watching closely - our family’s heritage, the company’s roots, and the diverse employees and customers we serve are top of mind,” the memo began. “It’s important that we reiterate our values to all of you and make it clear that we support each of our employees. We will continue to value diversity, inclusion, respect, and you can count on that.”

http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics...-questioned-stock-performance-overstated.html

The heavily reported cover story after the fact was just fucking bullshit.

Before the fact, they clearly signaled that as I said, they decided to ingratiate themselves with the type of people who will pay a premium for a label. Liberals.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Bullshit.

Who is "LadyF"?

Ivanka does not manufacture nor market/sell her clothing at all. Her name is licensed by the same people who make Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein and many other famous brands. (Ivanka receives a royalty check.) Department stores will play along with the boycott for a little while but will quielty put her back on the racks as the apparel group who makes her stuff is a multi-billion dollar company who can easily pull their other brands from the stores. Those stores can't afford to lose the sales of the other bigger brands. Also, most of the retailers are public companies who aren't going to allow their stocks to plummet over having empty retail floors if GIII pulls out.

Here you go, look at the other brands these guys license and tell me who truly has the upper hand, the retailers making a big show of taking her stuff off the shelves, or the company who distributes some of the biggest brands in the country?

http://ir.g-iii.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=725818

That's who. The one who pointed out the reality of the idiocy of the boycott and the dumping of Ivanka's line.

 

[Libsam]

dang, I shoulda bought this Ivanka tote when I saw it on zappos.com yesterday.
It's sold out now.

http://www.zappos.com/images/z/3/9/0/7/0/5/3907057-1-2x.jpg

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

lol...

 

[KingOrfeo]

Leftists have to politicize everything.

How is a presidential administration not already politicized?

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

It was not a tweet. It was a memo



http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics...-questioned-stock-performance-overstated.html

The heavily reported cover story after the fact was just fucking bullshit.

Before the fact, they clearly signaled that as I said, they decided to ingratiate themselves with the type of people who will pay a premium for a label. Liberals.

Liberals aren't the only ones who pay a premium for a label/brand. That happens across all parts of the political spectrum. The brands tend to be different is all...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Liberals aren't the only ones who pay a premium for a label/brand. That happens across all parts of the political spectrum. The brands tend to be different is all...

I stand corrected. I see that in my daughter, but in her case, I just see it as youth...



But she won't shop at Target any more.

 

[VeraBad]

These lists aren't correct.

For example, Zappos.com
They pulled their ads from breitbart.com after pressure from an anti-Trump initiative on twitter. But I assume they made the list because they currently carry some stuff from the Ivanka Trump line.

Bed, Bath & Beyond pulled their advertising from breitbart.com, because of the same anti-Trump twitter group. I have no idea why they're on the Trump boycott list, I haven't caught wind of that reason yet.

Wal-Mart isn't on the list of stores to patronize. They only carried pro-Hillary swag during the campaign, she was also on their board of directors for some time.

Whole Foods refused to take their ads off of breitbart.com, they aren't on the Trump boycott list.

That's just the few I recognize off the top of my head.

Thanks. I'll make changes on my list.

 

[irksomesauce]

There's not a lot of overlap between Walmart and Nordstrom shoppers. I've been to both and the customers do not look alike.

Basically, the exact same monumental mistake your gal Hillary made too, Andre.

You socialist class warfare pieces of shit never learn.

 

[Adre]

Basically, the exact same monumental mistake your gal Hillary made too, Andre.

You socialist class warfare pieces of shit never learn.

So you're saying those two categories of shoppers are interchangeable then, and that my observation is not factual.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Thanks. I'll make changes on my list.

You are the dummy who made the list? Your list contains as "safe" the people who make the most money off the "Ivanka Trump" brand. She probably makes about 7% of wholesale. Let me guess, you went to a variety of retailer websites, typed in the name "Trump" and called that research.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

That's who. The one who pointed out the reality of the idiocy of the boycott and the dumping of Ivanka's line.

So what is idiotic about it? If it says Ivanka Trump on it - stop buying it and stop giving her the 7%. Let them put someone else on there for the branding and let them make the 7%.

That is pretty much the definition of a boycott.

 

[KingOrfeo]

I hope everyone can agree that this kind of tactic is fair play. It would have been fair play for the left to fight the W Admin in the same way, if the Bush family had had any products on the market.

 

[irksomesauce]

So you're saying those two categories of shoppers are interchangeable then, and that my observation is not factual.

Of course they're "interchangeable", supremely proven simply by the fact that millions of people no doubt shop at both Walmart and Nordstrom.

And I most certainly did salute your "factual" "observation" by pointing-out your blatant and repugnant "socialist class warfare" and that socialist "pieces of shit" like you and your gal Hillary "never learn."

What's the problem, Andre?

 

[KingOrfeo]

There's not a lot of overlap between Walmart and Nordstrom shoppers. I've been to both and the customers do not look alike.

Basically, the exact same monumental mistake your gal Hillary made too, Andre.

. . . How does that follow?

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

I hope everyone can agree that this kind of tactic is fair play. It would have been fair play for the left to fight the W Admin in the same way, if the Bush family had had any products on the market.

What type of tactic? Boycott? Of course it is. But it's too bad this is an ineffective one because most people don't research what they are doing and instead join whatever bullshit comes down their newsfeed.

 

[Libsam]

It's like trying to boycott Pepsi products by not ordering a mountaindew when you go to taco bell.

To effectively boycott PepsiCo you'd have to stop going to Taco Bell (racist), KFC (racist), Hooters (sexist), PizzaHut (worst pizza ever), Applebees (aka Crapplebees), etc.

PepsiCo's female CEO said, "Trump supporters can take their business elsewhere" after the election.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

What type of tactic? Boycott? Of course it is. But it's too bad this is an ineffective one because most people don't research what they are doing and instead join whatever bullshit comes down their newsfeed.

Again, robbing Ivanka of her 7% is ineffective, how?

 

[Libsam]

I don't even really understand why people are boycotting Ivanka anyways.
You don't like this man, so you are going to try to hurt his daughter?

Women Unite!
Unless you are a republican woman, you can't come to our party. Feminism, alienating women every day.