Boycott Everything Trump Link

These lists aren't correct.

For example, Zappos.com
They pulled their ads from breitbart.com after pressure from an anti-Trump initiative on twitter. But I assume they made the list because they currently carry some stuff from the Ivanka Trump line.

Bed, Bath & Beyond pulled their advertising from breitbart.com, because of the same anti-Trump twitter group. I have no idea why they're on the Trump boycott list, I haven't caught wind of that reason yet.

Wal-Mart isn't on the list of stores to patronize. They only carried pro-Hillary swag during the campaign, she was also on their board of directors for some time.

Whole Foods refused to take their ads off of breitbart.com, they aren't on the Trump boycott list.

That's just the few I recognize off the top of my head.
 
Which is my sensing in many threads. It's a 'boycott everything/anything Trump'. Not boycott what's illegal.

If this serves anything, that is if trump is the Trojan horse he long appeared to be, you'd play right into that hand and implode.
 
If folks want to boycott trump junk, let them. Don't be a whiny cunt about it.
 
Which is my sensing in many threads. It's a 'boycott everything/anything Trump'. Not boycott what's illegal.

If this serves anything, that is if trump is the Trojan horse he long appeared to be, you'd play right into that hand and implode.

Ivanka will just go to a web-based business model and will sell to the "deplorables."

All the Left is doing is getting her out of the stores where they shop.

It's stupid, but I love it...

MOAR!!!
 
Ivanka will just go to a web-based business model and will sell to the "deplorables."

All the Left is doing is getting her out of the stores where they shop.

It's stupid, but I love it...

MOAR!!!

Yeah, getting her clothing pulled because of shitty sales is secretly winning for Ivanka! What a dumb prairee nigger...lmao.
 
Leftists have to politicize everything. They can't be happy unless they're perpetually angry. What a miserable existence.
 
Holy Marketing Genius, Batman! I never knew just how deep & how wide the Trump influence is!

Stores and retailers.... over three dozen stores currently profit from their relationship with the Trump family brand.

Hotels, golf & other attractions...almost too many to count in the United States, Brazil, Canada, India, Ireland, Panama, Philippines, Scotland, South Korea, Turkey, United Arab Emirates (UAE) & Uruguay.

Television... NBC Network & Mark Burnett Productions.
 
Ivanka will just go to a web-based business model and will sell to the "deplorables."

Ivanka does not manufacture nor market/sell her clothing at all. Her name is licensed by the same people who make Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein and many other famous brands. (Ivanka receives a royalty check.) Department stores will play along with the boycott for a little while but will quielty put her back on the racks as the apparel group who makes her stuff is a multi-billion dollar company who can easily pull their other brands from the stores. Those stores can't afford to lose the sales of the other bigger brands. Also, most of the retailers are public companies who aren't going to allow their stocks to plummet over having empty retail floors if GIII pulls out.
 
Last edited:
Ivanka does not manufacture nor market/sell her clothing at all. Her name is licensed by the same people who make Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein and many other famous brands. (Ivanka receives a royalty check.) Department stores will play along with the boycott for a little while but will quielty put her back on the racks as the apparel group who makes her stuff is a multi-billion dollar company who can easily pull their other brands from the stores. Those stores can't afford to lose the sales of the other bigger brands.

Thank you. I did not know this.
 
Ivanka does not manufacture nor market/sell her clothing at all. Her name is licensed by the same people who make Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein and many other famous brands. (Ivanka receives a royalty check.) Department stores will play along with the boycott for a little while but will quielty put her back on the racks as the apparel group who makes her stuff is a multi-billion dollar company who can easily pull their other brands from the stores. Those stores can't afford to lose the sales of the other bigger brands.

Thank you. I did not know this.

Neither did I. I wonder if 'Betty' did and if so why he didn't share? :)

Ishmael
 
Thank you. I did not know this.

Neither did I. I wonder if 'Betty' did and if so why he didn't share? :)

Ishmael

Here you go, look at the other brands these guys license and tell me who truly has the upper hand, the retailers making a big show of taking her stuff off the shelves, or the company who distributes some of the biggest brands in the country?

http://ir.g-iii.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=725818

December 10, 2012
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. Signs License for Ivanka Trump Brand
<snip>

G-III has fashion licenses under the Calvin Klein, Sean John, Kenneth Cole, Cole Haan, Guess?, Jones New York, Jessica Simpson, Vince Camuto, Nine West, Ellen Tracy, Tommy Hilfiger, Kensie, Mac & Jac, Levi's and Dockers brands and sports licenses with the National Football League, National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball, National Hockey League, Touch by Alyssa Milano and more than 100 U.S. colleges and universities.
 
I, for one, did not know she had a clothing line, so the Left is raising awareness and in an attempt to tarnish the brand, may actually be expanding it to the Walmart shopper...


;) ;)

There's not a lot of overlap between Walmart and Nordstrom shoppers. I've been to both and the customers do not look alike.
 
There's not a lot of overlap between Walmart and Nordstrom shoppers. I've been to both and the customers do not look alike.

You miss the broader point, as usual.

The point is that in order to support their guy, some of these people will seek out something Trump to purchase.
 
And before I go to work I will just point out that not a single medium has pointed out what I am saying here for good reason: a REAL boycott - which should be of GIII - would put millions of people out of work around the country. Their annual revenues are about $2 BILLION. That's wholesale. At retail that translates into $10 BILLION (conservatively speaking). You want to take that out of the US economy because Donald Trump is an asshole? That's not going to happen.
 
And before I go to work I will just point out that not a single medium has pointed out what I am saying here for good reason: a REAL boycott - which should be of GIII - would put millions of people out of work around the country. Their annual revenues are about $2 BILLION. That's wholesale. At retail that translates into $10 BILLION (conservatively speaking). You want to take that out of the US economy because Donald Trump is an asshole? That's not going to happen.

Actually there are more than a few that would be more than willing. Tanking the economy would surely fit in with their fondest desires.

Ishmael
 
Actually there are more than a few that would be more than willing. Tanking the economy would surely fit in with their fondest desires.

Ishmael

Amen. In the war on Trump, collateral damage is acceptable. Once they are back in power, they will fix everything they caused.
 
Amen. In the war on Trump, collateral damage is acceptable. Once they are back in power, they will fix everything they caused.

I'm waiting for the acts of true desperation to start, up to and including murder. Rioting, wanton property destruction and arson are already on the table. It's only a matter time before the next steps are taken.

Who would have thought that the home grown terrorists that Obama/Clinton administrations were prepping for would be coming from the 'progressives', not the militias?

Ishmael
 
I wrote about this in water505's thread about Kellogg's.
The story written about Kellogg's non-Trump support was taken from the reply the twitter breitbart ban people got when they wrote kelloggs to let them know their products were streaming on breitbarts page.

Anyways, those twitter breitbart ban people tried to get the company that puts all the ads on breitbart's page to not support breitbart. (who doesn't use an ad blocker?)
That company told them NO, so these guys went after the brands in the ads. These people are hurting themselves because ads on webpages are chosen by your search/shopping history.
 
I'm waiting for the acts of true desperation to start, up to and including murder. Rioting, wanton property destruction and arson are already on the table. It's only a matter time before the next steps are taken.

Who would have thought that the home grown terrorists that Obama/Clinton administrations were prepping for would be coming from the 'progressives', not the militias?

Ishmael

FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS!! (in my best Mike Yates impersonation) :D
 
I'm waiting for the acts of true desperation to start, up to and including murder. Rioting, wanton property destruction and arson are already on the table. It's only a matter time before the next steps are taken.

Who would have thought that the home grown terrorists that Obama/Clinton administrations were prepping for would be coming from the 'progressives', not the militias?

Ishmael

I have not only thought it but openly posited it. Socialist movements always resort to violence for through intimidation and silence they seek to be the only voices and opinions allowed to be expressed. To use Pookie's favorite word, the irony is that they will fight tooth nail and claw to protect their right to free speech.
 
Back
Top