A girl's preference - cut or uncut

Cut or Uncut

  • Cut

    Votes: 50 56.2%
  • Uncut

    Votes: 39 43.8%

  • Total voters
    89
I think I'm bias because I've only been with two men, one cut, one uncut. My husband is uncut and a much better lover, so that may influence my decision. He also keeps his very clean though, and we have never had any issues. Plus it's fun to play with ;) We also made the decision to keep our son uncut, and my husband has made sure he knows how to keep it clean.
 
I think I'm bias because I've only been with two men, one cut, one uncut. My husband is uncut and a much better lover, so that may influence my decision. He also keeps his very clean though, and we have never had any issues. Plus it's fun to play with ;) We also made the decision to keep our son uncut, and my husband has made sure he knows how to keep it clean.

Is there something about being uncut that you feel makes him a better lover or you just get a good one?
 
...Maybe you should start a thread for how a guy feels about a girl's clit hood?

Are you suggesting that I should start a thread about something – the removal of a woman's clit hood – that is rightly illegal in most jurisdictions unless it is done for vital medical reasons - if it is affected by cancer, for example? A lot of women on Lit would be justifiably angry if a man started a thread that treated the abhorrent practice of FGM in such a glib way.

In any case, such a thread would be pointless because, thankfully, very few men will have experienced a woman who has had her clit hood removed. Those that have will generally have suffered the removal of a lot more than just the hood.
 
Just beyond your grasp.


Aahahaha.
No.

It's a question of preference. That's all.
I answered it in a way of... all things being equal on this great guy, would you prefer cut or uncut?

I've had both. In my mouth, I prefer cut.
If I love the guy, or even like him enough to suck his cock, it's really doesn't matter.

Isn't that how everyone is answering this?
 
You can probably tick both boxes - but including a "not bothered" option would have been better if the OP wasn't trying to rig the answer.

Actually, I'm surprised that the response in support of 'cut' isn't greater given the US penchant for male genital mutilation for non-medical reasons – because that's what it is – many American women will only have experienced cut men.



Like the man said.

And few women, in my experience, have any correct idea as to how to keep themselves clean down there; not using perfumed soaps, gels, antiseptics, scented wipes or vaginal deodorants; only using soap on the outer bits, not in the vagina itself; not douching; and cleaning under the clit hood, the female equivalent of the male foreskin.

Removing a man's foreskin is much like removing a woman's clit hood and the effects are similar. Initially, the exposed head of the penis or the clit will become ultra-sensitive – probably far too sensitive to touch – but then, over time, it will deaden and lose much of its sensation.

Would those women who have voted for 'cut' be willing to have their clit hoods removed and lose much of the sensation in their clits?

No. I'll keep settling for less pay for equal work, though.

Ladies. Don't douche. Soap and water. That's it.

And there has been recent research that uncircumcised men carry more bacteria.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?...&q=related:_EacW3CMpHy17M:scholar.google.com/

Plus the mushroom head is adorable. 😍
 
No preference

Been with both. No preference. Elephant trunk or mushroom head, it's all the same to me. Keep it clean and I have no issues.

I left my boys uncut for both health reasons and a general consensus that they should look like their father.

There's really not much difference if the man keeps the foreskin pulled back.
And I disagree with the "adorable-ness" of the mushroom head...
I've seen some wacky looking wieners, and mostly due to an overzealously used scalpel...
:cool:
 
Been with both. No preference. Elephant trunk or mushroom head, it's all the same to me. Keep it clean and I have no issues.

I left my boys uncut for both health reasons and a general consensus that they should look like their father.

There's really not much difference if the man keeps the foreskin pulled back.
And I disagree with the "adorable-ness" of the mushroom head...
I've seen some wacky looking wieners, and mostly due to an overzealously used scalpel...
:cool:

Ahhhaaaaa!!!
I don't really care either.
As long as there is a nice curve...:eek:
 
I have not been with an uncut man. I just think the idea of no foreskin to collect bacteria sounds good. I know, now everyone is going to tell me about uncut men knowing how to keep it clean. Please don't bother, I expressed an opinion and I think I have a right to do that.

Love your answer...I'm the same way :)
 
No. I'll keep settling for less pay for equal work, though.

MYTH 5: Women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns—for doing the same work.

FACTS: No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.
 
MYTH 5: Women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns—for doing the same work.

FACTS: No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.

Links?
(I really don't want to derail the thread even further, but would love to be wrong about this. Really.)
 
Must have missed something...when did the thread jump from cocks to economics? Oh and I never call mine a mushroom...I call it a helmet....just sayin
 
Are you suggesting that I should start a thread about something – the removal of a woman's clit hood – that is rightly illegal in most jurisdictions unless it is done for vital medical reasons - if it is affected by cancer, for example? A lot of women on Lit would be justifiably angry if a man started a thread that treated the abhorrent practice of FGM in such a glib way.

In any case, such a thread would be pointless because, thankfully, very few men will have experienced a woman who has had her clit hood removed. Those that have will generally have suffered the removal of a lot more than just the hood.

Not at all. I was suggesting that you explore what men think about different virginal constructions - not removal. As you may note, I have no where suggested that uncut men should start considering circumcisions:eek:
 
...And there has been recent research that uncircumcised men carry more bacteria.

That's not what the source you quote says. All it says is that circumcised men in Uganda were found to be less likely to get HIV and some other STIs such as herpes, than uncircumcised men. That may be because the skin on a circumcised man becomes tougher (ie less sensitive).

Personally, I'd rather rely on a condom. Hoping that you won't get HIV because you're circumcised may be a bit risky!

The study you made reference to made no attempt to see if its results were specific to Uganda or East Africa but the US health fraternity leapt on it to justify circumcision, possibly because of the vast amount of money the private US health industry makes out of unnecessarily chopping bits off boys' dicks without their consent. The validity of the findings has been disputed in other parts of the world and a doctor carrying out a medically-unnecessary circumcision in many other countries would probably be charged with malpractice.
 
That's not what the source you quote says. All it says is that circumcised men in Uganda were found to be less likely to get HIV and some other STIs such as herpes, than uncircumcised men. That may be because the skin on a circumcised man becomes tougher (ie less sensitive).

Personally, I'd rather rely on a condom. Hoping that you won't get HIV because you're circumcised may be a bit risky!

The study you made reference to made no attempt to see if its results were specific to Uganda or East Africa but the US health fraternity leapt on it to justify circumcision, possibly because of the vast amount of money the private US health industry makes out of unnecessarily chopping bits off boys' dicks without their consent. The validity of the findings has been disputed in other parts of the world and a doctor carrying out a medically-unnecessary circumcision in many other countries would probably be charged with malpractice.

What's with all the bacteria talk? Who carries handy wipes to use before giving a blowjob?
Say - is that pre-cum or pee I see puddling there?
 
Wow is there a clash of cultures going on here!

I'm so shocked to read posts by American women who I admire on here, nonchalantly making a preference for what I regard as the consequence of abuse inflicted on baby boys. Please, America! It's barbaric! When is some guy going to be courageous enough to sue his parents and the medics who cooperated with them so as to get this monstrous business closed down!
 
Cut or Uncut cocks?

I voted for cut dicks. I think they are sexier and such a turn on to see. The uncut cock is nice, just a little different, and has a different taste to it that I can't describe.

I know this thread is meant for girls, but wanted all you sexy women to know that I love giving passionate blow jobs, and really truly love everything about it.

I'm male, and I am a cock sucker and cum lover. Have sucked off 1 uncut and 23 cut men so far.

It's an intimate, wonderful sexual act to perform.
 
Wow is there a clash of cultures going on here!

I'm so shocked to read posts by American women who I admire on here, nonchalantly making a preference for what I regard as the consequence of abuse inflicted on baby boys. Please, America! It's barbaric! When is some guy going to be courageous enough to sue his parents and the medics who cooperated with them so as to get this monstrous business closed down!

Great - way to go. What about all the guys who already have had the circle blade of foreskin death leave its mark?
Nice that over 60% responding women have said "its ok I like you just the way you are."
 
I voted for cut dicks. I think they are sexier and such a turn on to see. The uncut cock is nice, just a little different, and has a different taste to it that I can't describe.

I know this thread is meant for girls, but wanted all you sexy women to know that I love giving passionate blow jobs, and really truly love everything about it.

I'm male, and I am a cock sucker and cum lover. Have sucked off 1 uncut and 23 cut men so far.

It's an intimate, wonderful sexual act to perform.

I didn't think about the taste difference - why is that? (and please do not go to bacteria!)
 
I bet some women can't tell if the some guys are cut when they look at it when it's erect.
 
What's with all the bacteria talk?

You'd better ask JulieAnn42. It's one of those fallacious reasons that get dragged up to justify male circumcision.

I have not been with an uncut man. I just think the idea of no foreskin to collect bacteria sounds good. I know, now everyone is going to tell me about uncut men knowing how to keep it clean. Please don't bother, I expressed an opinion and I think I have a right to do that.
 
Back
Top