Trump to eliminate taxation of profits to bring companies back!

Hillary Hillary Hillary
mumbe mumble mumble
Obama-mama-mama
grumble grumble grumble

:rolleyes:
 
Obama-mama-mama
rabble rabble rabble
Hillary Hillary Hillary
babble babble babble

:confused:
 
The premise in the OP doesn't seem correct. As far as I know Trump has not said anything about eliminating taxes on profits other than those held overseas and even with those I've read his plan is to reduce the tax to bring it back not eliminate it.
Maybe something has changed but no information has been given.
 
The premise in the OP doesn't seem correct. As far as I know Trump has not said anything about eliminating taxes on profits other than those held overseas and even with those I've read his plan is to reduce the tax to bring it back not eliminate it.
Maybe something has changed but no information has been given.

Yeah, the OP only wants to ask a question, as he has stated; facts are in the way of the serious charge against anyone who did not vote for Hillary...

He wants everyone to present a solution to the loss of the unicorn.
 
;) ;)



No one gives a flying squirrel shit as to what you think, but this time you're not even thinking, just doing the c&p and engaging in non-sequitors.

For example: Trump's properties are privately owned and like Target he can have whatever the fuck policy he wants and people can choose to accept or reject it of their own free will. Similarly, locally, we, as communities, pay property tax and own our schools so we should get to set the policies, not some unaccountable Progressive bureaucrats in DC working in that monstrosity created by the idiot Jimmy "Peanuts" Carter as a fop to the power of the NEA.

Now, try and present a cogent thought.

Double-Dawg DARE!

I always enjoy your reaction when you are exposed to facts you don't like. From the same article,

"Many social conservatives were quick to condemn Mr. Trump’s comments, saying he could face a backlash, especially among voters in the Republican base, some of whom are already skeptical of his past support of abortion rights.

“There’s a lot of Republicans that are very uncomfortable with this issue, to say the least, or think it’s ridiculous that we’re going down this path and some people believe putting our children at risk,” said Greg Mueller, a conservative strategist. “For somebody who is trying to build a coalition of conservatives and evangelicals, and then maybe some Democratic votes to get you into the White House, you are taking somewhat of a political risk in the position he took this morning.”

Penny Young Nance, the president of Concerned Women for America, said Mr. Trump’s remarks on Thursday illustrated “why conservatives are right to question his judgment.”

“His instincts are wrong on our core values,” she said. “He has spent his life surrounded by Manhattan elites who have never shopped in a Target. Of course he doesn’t get the outrage. I don’t know if this will ultimately hurt him but it should.”
 
Jesus fucking Christ...

All you had was a c&p.

And then your little pea-brain decided to expound with more c&p.

You even fucking ignored all that I had posited previously because you wanted to make one ignorant back-wood non-sequoutatal remark that was supposed to be fucking brilliant.

And your only rebuttal is c&p!

Come back when you grow a brain...
 
Yeah, the OP only wants to ask a question, as he has stated; facts are in the way of the serious charge against anyone who did not vote for Hillary...

He wants everyone to present a solution to the loss of the unicorn.

^ struggling to derail thread ^
 
And he doesn't even know why.

It seems to be some kinda Pavlovian response.
 
"As foreplay, the sapiosexual person may crave philosophical, political or psychological discussions, because this turns them on." ~Psychology Today


Isn't this just a new label for coeds that fuck their professors?
 


I'm shocked you went knee jerk victim in true SJW fashion zumi :rolleyes:

Any chance you want to try and connect destruction of black neighborhoods 95+ years ago as relevant to the left end of the black community wanting to self segregation movement in the last 2 years largely by the under 30 SJW campus crowd of uppity rich kids??


And if you want to discuss the destruction of the black neighborhoods in recent years I'm down, you know relevant shit and not great grandma's strife. Or shit even the historical stuff but I don't think that shit is really relevant to the struggles of today but I'd be more than happy to read your case.
 
Last edited:
I'm shocked you went knee jerk victim in true SJW fashion zumi :rolleyes:

Any chance you want to try and connect destruction of black neighborhoods 95+ years ago as relevant to the left end of the black community wanting to self segregation movement in the last 2 years largely by the under 30 SJW campus crowd of uppity rich kids??


And if you want to discuss the destruction of the black neighborhoods in recent years I'm down, you know relevant shit and not great grandma's strife. Or shit even the historical stuff but I don't think that shit is really relevant to the struggles of today but I'd be more than happy to read your case.

It's highly relevant to the bullshit that Ish tried to serve as fresh pancakes. When self-appointed Negro Whisperers keep playing sage gurus to a history that they aren't about, this is that history they ain't about.

You're a smart boy, once you take a lunch break from your silly SJW VICTIMS KILL WHITE MAN SPECIAL SAFE PLACE SNOWFLAKE BLAH BLAH BLAH hula hooping that impresses nobody but yourself, light up a nice fatty, engage your critical mind and suss out the relevancy that forever connects past to present in this country. Even for Asian-Ams and hapas like you.
 
It's highly relevant to the bullshit that Ish tried to serve as fresh pancakes.

You just keep saying that.

How?

You're a smart boy, once you take a lunch break from your silly SJW VICTIMS KILL WHITE MAN SPECIAL SAFE PLACE SNOWFLAKE BLAH BLAH BLAH hula hooping that impresses nobody but yourself,

I'm just calling the regressive left on their regressive bullshit, I didn't expect to make friends over it.

light up a nice fatty, engage your critical mind and suss out the relevancy that forever connects past to present in this country.

I'm asking you to do that.

Because I don't think 100 year old race riots have anything to do with the regressive left element of the black community supporting racial segregation in 2015-2016.

I don't think it in any way oppresses anyone either.

Not any more than the Japanese are oppressing me because they raped, tortured and enslaved my family members generations back in the day. Oh yea, Koreans got some dark ass days in their history....every bit as dark as black folks or jews.

Sounds more like a deflection so we don't have to REALLY think about how backwards that shit actually is.

Even for Asian-Ams and hapas like you.

My being a mutt has NOTHING to do with anything.

I'm NOT a victim of my cultural history.

And I really don't see how anyone else is either.
 
Last edited:
I'm just curious - when it comes to paying a fair share what people mean by "fair". Is there some external reference point? Generally fair implies some standard, usually external. What standard are you using as a definition of fair?
 
I'm just curious - when it comes to paying a fair share what people mean by "fair". Is there some external reference point? Generally fair implies some standard, usually external. What standard are you using as a definition of fair?

I inagine fair is that everone pays in the same amount.

However, in this era where the public is manufacturing digital currencies on their comps and these monies are being exchanged for real currencies, goods and services - I would argue that it is time to reinvent this wheel and jettison taxation altogether.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top