Blue
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2016
- Posts
- 3,097
UK to ban "non-conventional" pornography
What the actual fishsticks?!
No news outlet is actually giving specifics as to what 'non-conventional' is other than scat and urine stuff, so I've taken the liberty of doing the research for you and compiled this short list according to BBFC (British Board of Film Classification) which will soon extend to the internet, of horrific and morally abusive content:
- Ageplay
- Rape fantasies (An ambiguous one too, technically the rule could extend to any possible expression of "no")
- "The infliction of pain or acts which may cause physical harm, whether real or simulated."
- In tandem with the above; "material which reinforces the suggestion that victims enjoy sexual violence"
^ Take note of how "victims" is presupposed and not open to the interpretation that the "sexual violence" could be consensual. Also based on legal precedent the "pain or acts" in question does include spanking, flogging and other such S&M things, so it's not for snuff films or anything like that.
- "penetration by any object associated with violence"
- "Strong physical or verbal abuse, even if consensual, is unlikely to be acceptable"
- Public sex acts
- Spanking
- Caning
- Aggressive whipping
- Physical restraint
- Humiliation
- Strangulation
It's essentially anything fetishistic that anybody could be offended or insulted by.
It's also worth noting that a number of BDSM and other fetishistic film producers have been shut down since the 2010 version of this new act which extended to film and video media, this one is broadening it to the internet.
Porn isn't my thing, but it's the very idea that I'm incensed by. We know from recent historical precedent that the ultra-conservative government have a vendetta against anything but missionary style sex and now they want to crack down on the internet too! Because of course anybody with a more vibrant sex life than the gargoyles in Parliament is doing it wrong and must be kept in line.
You'd think that because there's no popular demand or legitimate reasoning behind this it would never pass. But in just the past decade the government has gradually restricted people's sex lives more and more and there's no reason to think that this will be the one thing that doesn't get passed.
This country is just getting more and more authoritarian by the week.
What the actual fishsticks?!
No news outlet is actually giving specifics as to what 'non-conventional' is other than scat and urine stuff, so I've taken the liberty of doing the research for you and compiled this short list according to BBFC (British Board of Film Classification) which will soon extend to the internet, of horrific and morally abusive content:
- Ageplay
- Rape fantasies (An ambiguous one too, technically the rule could extend to any possible expression of "no")
- "The infliction of pain or acts which may cause physical harm, whether real or simulated."
- In tandem with the above; "material which reinforces the suggestion that victims enjoy sexual violence"
^ Take note of how "victims" is presupposed and not open to the interpretation that the "sexual violence" could be consensual. Also based on legal precedent the "pain or acts" in question does include spanking, flogging and other such S&M things, so it's not for snuff films or anything like that.
- "penetration by any object associated with violence"
- "Strong physical or verbal abuse, even if consensual, is unlikely to be acceptable"
- Public sex acts
- Spanking
- Caning
- Aggressive whipping
- Physical restraint
- Humiliation
- Strangulation
It's essentially anything fetishistic that anybody could be offended or insulted by.
It's also worth noting that a number of BDSM and other fetishistic film producers have been shut down since the 2010 version of this new act which extended to film and video media, this one is broadening it to the internet.
Porn isn't my thing, but it's the very idea that I'm incensed by. We know from recent historical precedent that the ultra-conservative government have a vendetta against anything but missionary style sex and now they want to crack down on the internet too! Because of course anybody with a more vibrant sex life than the gargoyles in Parliament is doing it wrong and must be kept in line.
You'd think that because there's no popular demand or legitimate reasoning behind this it would never pass. But in just the past decade the government has gradually restricted people's sex lives more and more and there's no reason to think that this will be the one thing that doesn't get passed.
This country is just getting more and more authoritarian by the week.
Last edited:

"