Who's the biggest SJW on the GB?

BTW:

I always wondered: How come most of the GB males describe or see themselves as "doms"?

Shouting the loudest in the room doesn't prove your status, boys

Quoted for irony.

Additionally, can you point to the profiles or posts where 'most' GB males have described themselves as doms? Are you just making that up as well? I can only think of a few who openly describe themselves as such.
 
Quoted for irony.

Additionally, can you point to the profiles or posts where 'most' GB males have described themselves as doms? Are you just making that up as well? I can only think of a few who openly describe themselves as such.
Like stupid moths to the light lol
You, for instance clearly see yourself as one, dummy
It oozes from all of your posts.
 
Ann joined the show lol

This might turn out to be funny after all.
I'll just sit back and observe
 
I worry about people that invest so much time in online endeavors that it borders on obsession. I don't know too much about this fight but I read threads and post after post. We, as humans, do little without a pay-off. What is your pay-off?
You, obviously, are very dedicated. Why not that dedication off the boards where you can actually make a difference?
 
To have a laugh at or to mock asshats
The GB is full of turds and dummies; best material for that
 
While I disagree with a some of the premises behind the aims of policies and programs promoted by people who would consider themselves working for social justice ideology, I can't see how the intent to promote equality among all people makes a good perjorative.
 
Last edited:
I worry about people that invest so much time in online endeavors that it borders on obsession. I don't know too much about this fight but I read threads and post after post. We, as humans, do little without a pay-off. What is your pay-off?
You, obviously, are very dedicated. Why not that dedication off the boards where you can actually make a difference?

Says the "paid poster".
 
While I disagree with a some of the premises behind the aims of policies and programs promoted by people who would consider themselves working for social justice ideology, I can't see how the intent to promote equality among all people makes a good perjorative.

What an odd edit, Q-####. Were you afraid that your question qualified you as one of the dumbasses #### said he likes to mock?
 
Users of the word "cuck" don't get to talk about others being on the ass-end of anything.

Maybe his fake cancer is acting up again and he's just begging to get banned so he can take another hiatus.
:rolleyes:
 
What an odd edit, Q-####. Were you afraid that your question qualified you as one of the dumbasses #### said he likes to mock?

What's odd, Luk-####, about deciding not to fuel hashtag's persecution fantasies?
 
Maybe his fake cancer is acting up again and he's just begging to get banned so he can take another hiatus.

Keep it classy, turd.

Until now you were covering for illicit comments by posters with certain propensities,
and now you're mocking serious illnesses.
 
Find something, I have 11 years of easily researched post history. See I've never been banned (or even warned) for my behavior here. Never changed login names nor changed my name to try to hide my post history.

Get crackin', because you have tens of thousands of posts to look through.

You don't get irony much, do you?
His post was meant to be SARCASTIC.

And he thinks that We are the morons and stupids lol
 
Keep it classy, turd.

Until now you were covering for illicit comments by posters with certain propensities,
and now you're mocking serious illnesses.

I wasn't covering for anything, quite the opposite. I made a very clear statement about the attacks you have your boxers in a bunch over which you failed to read or comprehend.

...

While Alea45's personal attacks on 4est are crude and distasteful, they are not an actual breech of the rules. Even the 'pet gook' comment, while being offensive on many levels, is not a violation, definitely not of the rule you have gleefully and repeatedly broken. The difference being that whoever is posting under that login is smart enough to avoid saying something that will get them banned outright or at least, unlike you, smart enough to heed a warning.


What I was doing was making fun of you because you're an idiot who makes accusations he can't back up.


Also, fake cancer is not at all serious.
 
You don't get irony much, do you?
His post was meant to be SARCASTIC.

And he thinks that We are the morons and stupids lol

I do, and you just keep proving me right.

Now run along and look up the definition of Irony and sarcasm. :rolleyes:
 
Way past your morning coffee, huh?
Dumbass

An advantage of being upper management, I decided to work from home today. It's not difficult to poke you with a sharp stick between emails, telephone calls, and interoffice memos.

They have these things called multiple monitors. At the moment Lit is running in a browser on my right monitor while I'm reading and responding to emails on the left one through a remote desktop connection to my office PC. Technology is a wonderful thing. Maybe one day you can flip burgers or something via remote connection. :rolleyes:
 
Should we feel guilty about provoking someone who is obviously mentally disabled? I don't, but maybe this ought be considered.
 
Back
Top