Sign in here if you believe Hillary has done nothing illegal

[OldJourno]

Who can believe the bad things people are saying about this dedicated public servant?

 

[OldJourno]

Call me surprised. Thought there'd be at least ... well, two or three.

 

[tedsbeds]

Call me surprised. Thought there'd be at least ... well, two or three.

Till she has a day in court and is convicted as the constitution says Innocent to proven guilty,

 

[Mello_SixtyNine]

Well, lying to Congress while under oath is a felony...so there's that.

 

[Bidin~Time]

The American people do not care whether she has done anything illegal, unethical, untrustworthy or immoral. She reflects the America we live in today, she WILL be elected, and she will lead us straight to hell.

There, I said it.

 

[VeraBad]

She's done nothing illegal. I'm waiting for one piece of proof. The FBI has none.

 

[phrodeau]

Well, lying to Congress while under oath is a felony...so there's that.

That was Bill, not Hillary.

 

[Conager]

That was Bill, not Hillary.

The Director of the FBI stated plainly, when asked, that several assertions she made in her testimony were untrue.

The lawyer-couple that lies under oath together...

Ah.

You know what?

What difference does it make at this point.

 

[phrodeau]

The Director of the FBI stated plainly, when asked, that several assertions she made in her testimony were untrue.

The lawyer-couple that lies under oath together...

Ah.

You know what?

What difference does it make at this point.

So either he lied or she lied. OK.

 

[Mello_SixtyNine]

That was Bill, not Hillary.

Seriously?
Do you own a tv?

Youtube rebuttal.

 

[Conager]

So either he lied or she lied. OK.

In court, or congress, they don't flip a coin over who is lying.

The evidence only supports one of them, and the other one is the only one that directly benefits from lying.

Your role here should be to excuse Clinton for lying, not pretend that she didn't lie. Go with something like "those mean old Republicans were badgering her! She had a right to lie. That's just normal for an officer of the court with a lyers, I mean a a lawyering license that has made a normal, human mistake to lie because it's somewhat embarrassing and it's perfectly ok to commit perjury to avoid embarrassment."

You know- the way you excuse her husband's well-documented tendency towards perjury.

 

[sr71plt]

Well, it's obvious that Trump is so deep into litigation (some 3,700 suits) and a whole variety of impending investigations and court cases, going as deep as the rape of a minor, while there isn't a single legal charge against Hillary Clinton outstanding that any talk of Clinton's legal problems is just a massive attempt to deflect who the real problem in illegality terms is.

 

[Conager]

Well, it's obvious that Trump is so deep into litigation (some 3,700 suits) and a whole variety of impending investigations and court cases, going as deep as the rape of a minor, while there isn't a single legal charge against Hillary Clinton outstanding that any talk of Clinton's legal problems is just a massive attempt to deflect who the real problem in illegality terms is.

You need to go to the Clinton campaign website to get your updated talking points the alleged rape (civil) case filed by a lawyer who claimed to have an anonymous client has been abandoned.

The clintons invented deflection they raised it to an art form for you to with a straight face say that there are many misdeeds are all deflection is pretty funny.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

The American people do not care whether she has done anything illegal, unethical, untrustworthy or immoral. She reflects the America we live in today, she WILL be elected, and she will lead us straight to hell.

There, I said it.

We'll know more Wednesday.

She may be unable to govern because of Congressional opposition. And as many Americans oppose her as want her.

 

[mark_j]

The Director of the FBI stated plainly, when asked, that several assertions she made in her testimony were untrue.

The lawyer-couple that lies under oath together...

Ah.

You know what?

What difference does it make at this point.

What difference does it make?

 

[BotanyBoy]

She's done nothing illegal. I'm waiting for one piece of proof. The FBI has none.

The FBI found 110 emails, that were classified US Government documents on her private electronic devices.

"seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. "

That's illegal, bigger than all shit.

Anyone without POTUS and AG covering for them would be in fuckin prison for that.

We send poor people to prison for FAR less all year every year. Zero tolerance for poor folks.

 

[1sickbastard]

We send poor people to prison for FAR less all year every year. Zero tolerance for poor folks.

That's because poor folks don't have the requisite amounts of dirty green paper with dead people's faces on it.

Plutocracy, the best democracy money can buy.

 

[Hypoxia]

A few poiints re: the above:

1) Everybody does illegal stuff. I've already committed five crimes since I woke up an hour ago. You probably can't go outdoors for ten minutes without violating some law or another. So no, I don't believe HRC has done nothing illegal. Only death brings perfection. But I think she's a smart lawyer who knows how to skirt the edge without falling off.

2) HRC had explicit executive authority re: classification. She (or her designated underling) get to decide what isn't or is classified, and at what level. [/end topic]

3) Other department and agency heads had classified material on, and conducted gov't business on, private servers because they distrusted their unreliable and leaky official servers. Those secretaries and directors aren't running for office and aren't being selectively persecuted; HRC is.

4) HRC is guilty of many crimes that exist only within the heads of her detractors. GOPs have been after HRC for almost three decades, spending about a billion taxpayer bucks on her and WJC, and except for Bill's BJ have come up with nothing, nada, zip, fuck-all. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence but absence of indictments is pretty indicative. (And yes, high gov't officials go to jail too. Cf the Reagan-Bush team.)

5) Tromp has been involved in over 3500 lawsuits and has lost many. Tromp has court dates upcoming. HRC has never been charged with anything. Tromp spews a constant stream of blatant lies, yet USAnians see him as more honest than HRC. Thanks, propaganda machine!

BTW I have never voted for a Clinton or their clique and I didn't start now; I voted for Stein (again). Still, while HRC is no saint, Tromp is a self-proclaimed disaster. Make your choice.

 

[BotanyBoy]

1) Everybody does illegal stuff.

And when they get caught they usually get prosecuted. Especially if it violates national security.

2) HRC had explicit executive authority re: classification. She (or her designated underling) get to decide what isn't or is classified, and at what level. [/end topic]

That doesn't mean she gets to send it to the house.

3) Other department and agency heads had classified material on, and conducted gov't business on, private servers because they distrusted their unreliable and leaky official servers.

Then they need to be investigated and taken to task. The elitism and 'rules are for poor people' attitude that you clearly support as long as (D)'s are the ones doing it, needs to stop.

BTW I have never voted for a Clinton or their clique.

But you shill for her with the best of them. I think SR71 might be the only person on the GB who cheers her on more than you.

 

[Real_American21]

Well, it's obvious that Trump is so deep into litigation (some 3,700 suits) and a whole variety of impending investigations and court cases, going as deep as the rape of a minor, while there isn't a single legal charge against Hillary Clinton outstanding that any talk of Clinton's legal problems is just a massive attempt to deflect who the real problem in illegality terms is.

Hillary is a serial rapists and has raped children also.

 

[butters]

Hillary is a serial rapists and has raped children also.

prove it

take your proof to a court



oh wait - you got nuthin'

 

[Liar]

*Nothing* illegal? Even if we discound jaywalking and shit. I'm sure she has. Or organisations she's been more-or-less responsible for has. It comes with complexity.

I just don't, y'know, care.

 

[Hypoxia]

But you shill for her with the best of them. I think SR71 might be the only person on the GB who cheers her on more than you.

So you haven't noticed all the anti-HRC stuff I've posted. Note: fearing Tromp doesn't mean I support HRC. HRC is deplorable. Tromp is disastrous. There's a difference. You want a guy who has promised to start illegal wars, jail opponents, shred the Constitution, run the country like a banana republic? Is that your preference? If so, I have little respect for you.

 

[BotanyBoy]

So you haven't noticed all the anti-HRC stuff I've posted.
Note: fearing Tromp doesn't mean I support HRC.

No it's mostly been "butt...BUTT TRUMP!!!"

HRC is deplorable. Tromp is disastrous. There's a difference.

I don't think there is and I don't think Tromp is anymore disastrous than Clinton.

Trump is all that is wrong with our society and Clinton is all that is wrong with our government.

Flip a coin.

You want a guy who has promised to start illegal wars,

No different than the last 10 or so presidents. HRC the warmonger I doubt will be a POTUS of peace.

jail opponents

Ones caught with piles of illegally stolen classified US Government documents that were TOTALLY BLATANTLY let off because reasons??

Reasons like friends with POTUS/AG/FBI Director??

Yea I would hope so. I would REALLY like to see the elites subject to the same laws I am for once.

(D) doesn't = above the law for me like it does most Democrat voters.

In fact between that and their coporate market grubbing socialist 1% dick suckers who hate people doing better for themselves, Democrats in California have pushed me back right.

They almost had me believing their bullshit lies about how they want to help people, provide opportunities and all that other warm fuzzy bullshit.

shred the Constitution

No different than Clinton, Bush, Obummer or Clinton.

run the country like a banana republic?

What makes you think Clinton wont?

She's more anti capitalist than Tromp by a long shot.

Is that your preference? If so, I have little respect for you.

I never thought you had ANY.

 

[about_average]

The Director of the FBI stated plainly, when asked, that several assertions she made in her testimony were untrue.

Or maybe...

"We have no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI," Comey told House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) during one of the hearing's opening exchanges.

So either Clinton lied, or the director if the FBI lied, take your pick.