To the people running this website....how is the censorship working out for you

[live4thebj]

@FiveInch033

What they said below.

Laurel and Manu can run this site however they want, it's their site NOT yours. If you don't like it......here's the door for you to leave...........
View attachment 2544778

If you don’t like it, vote with your feet, bro.

I know I do.
And in my experience, big men have great oral skills as well.

 

[TwinkleStars]

Just a little of what I hope to be a bit of constructive criticism, given my time here enjoying myself.
I think we should ask Lit to offer the ability to block people. Or, at the very least, give the person who is suddenly being "followed" the option of accepting it or not, rather than what I consider to be an invasive message of "XYZ is now following you".
Why would I want someone with zero profile to suddenly be able to "follow" me and see everything I post or chat about? I think we all should be given a choice as to who we allow to see our offerings to this lovely site.
On Flickr, when I receive such a notification, I have the option of blocking them. I don't think it would take more than a few clicks for the IT people here on Literotica to add this valuable option. Anyone with me on this?

You can block people. It's called 'ignore' on here. Click on their profile and click 'ignore'.

Your welcome.

 

[NightBirdNYC]

You can block people. It's called 'ignore' on here. Click on their profile and click 'ignore'.

Your welcome.

Thanks so much for that!

 

[lifeis2short2b]

OK so someone has an issue/questions about the site. Our reply is to leave ? How does that make the site better ? What I find interesting is some things/pics are deleted where something almost exactly the same are not. I think I could understand people's confusion. I myself have some problems with some pics and even some threads, but I realize where I am and what's good for one is not good for all. I do however see some things that violate the Lit criteria that stay up and other's that get taken off that I don't understand why.

I really don't think it's Laurel and Manu site. They run it but the people on the site make it what it is. Don't get me wrong I don't want the responsibility that Laurel and Manu have and the job is usually a no win situation. But perhaps instead of just taking something down there should be an open/ conversation about it.

I think the best answer on this point is if you don't like something/someone just block/ignore them. We all have that feature

 

[write_or_wrong]

As a member, accessing Lit from Texas where the government has passed laws restricting citizen's ability to view any web content deemed pornographic, I have seen how one site after another has become unavailable due to its content and the government's interpretation of it. Other states have also taken this path, and more are considering it. I would hate to lose all contact with Lit because some politician decided it was pornographic. If the owners/managers of the site are trying to prevent that, I say full speed ahead. I have seen firsthand what can happen if you get on the wrong side of this puritan wave.