Assange: Clinton is a cog for Goldman Sachs & the Saudis

hashtag45

badass 2nd rate Litizen
Joined
May 9, 2015
Posts
9,307
Assange: Clinton is a cog for Goldman Sachs & the Saudis (JOHN PILGER EXCLUSIVE VIDEO & TRANSCRIPT)
https://www.rt.com/news/365405-assange-pilger-full-transcript/

"Assange: Clinton is a cog for Goldman Sachs & the Saudis

So, there's a thread that runs through all of [the published] emails. There is quite a lot of "pay for play," as they call it – taking… giving access in exchange for money for many individual states, individuals and corporations – combined with the cover-up of Hillary Clinton's emails while she was Secretary of State has led to an environment where the pressure on the FBI increases.
Hillary represents a whole network of people, and a network of relationships also with particular states.
She's this centralizing cog, from the big banks like Goldman Sachs, and major elements of Wall Street, and intelligence, and people in the State Department, and the Saudis, and so on.
That is more or less what is in power now in the United States.

JP:So, Wall Street decides the cabinet of the president of the United States.

In fact, one of the most significant Podesta emails that we released was about how the Obama cabinet was formed – and half the Obama cabinet was basically nominated by a representative from Citibank. It is quite amazing.
If you were following the Obama campaign back then closely, you could see it had become very close to banking interests. It wasn't so close to oil interests but it was very close to banking interests.

‘Saudi Arabia & Qatar funding ISIS and Clinton’

JA: There's an early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton, so not so long after she left [her job as] Secretary of State, to her campaign manager John Podesta. That email, it states that ISIL, ISIS is funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar – the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Now, this is a… I actually think this is the most significant email in the whole collection...
… …And perhaps because Saudi and Qatari money is spread all over the place, including into many media institutions, all serious analysts know, even the US government has mentioned or agreed with that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIS, funding ISIS. But the dodge has always been, that's… what… it's just some rogue princes using their cut of the oil money to do what they like but actually the government disapproves. But that email says that no, it is the governments of Saudi and the government of Qatar that have been funding ISIS.

JP:The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis – particularly the Saudis and the Qataris giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly to Saudi Arabia.."
 
Last edited:
We didn't need Julian to confirm what we already knew.


;) ;)


Between the speeches and Huma...
 
It's just that the board has gone beserk with all the CuntClinton versus Promiscuous Trump threads Lol

So one naturally wants a piece of that pie too
 
Nobody cares, certainly not Democrats.

The idea of Wall St. elites no longer running the country sends them into full panic mode.

They love the rich, they love them using the government to fuck the rest of us over and they want more of it.
 
I think so too.
Just an example: my other threads about values - Islam and misogyny had a few dems. posting in order to call me "a racist",
yet my last two threads: *crickets*

And they still attack the messengers and so on, while avoiding any discussion about the content of her emails.
 
I think so too.
Just an example: my other threads about values - Islam and misogyny had a few dems. posting in order to call me "a racist",
yet my last two threads: *crickets*

And they still attack the messengers and so on, while avoiding any discussion about the content of her emails.

Do you have any copies of the actual emails and can verify that these were never tampered with by the persons who illegally intercepted them?

































:rolleyes:

I thought not.
 
I can't help it if you are too dumb to comprehend what I actually said.

:D

You said, and I quote, "copies of the actual emails".

I rest my case.

And will probably laugh out loud at your stupidity for days to come.
 
Remember those email forwards originating from the comps of Wingnutz, like the one about Obama giving away islands in the Bering Sea to Russia?



I find those emails more trustworthy.
 
Remember those email forwards originating from the comps of Wingnutz, like the one about Obama giving away islands in the Bering Sea to Russia?



I find those emails more trustworthy.

Please provide a list of all the Wikileaks documents proved to be false since they began publishing.

Oh don't bother, here it is:







-

And please provide a list of all the emails that the Clinton clique is disputing are real.

Oh no, here that is:












-
 
How can you prove that the text of an email isn't altered without seeing the original text on the original computer it was stolen from?

Umm ... uhh ... duh .....

Show us the originals so we can verify the Wikileaks versions aren't doctored.

Until then .......
 
How can you prove that the text of an email isn't altered without seeing the original text on the original computer it was stolen from?
.
1.Good point.
I'll ask the same question, because I'm curious to know

2.On the other hand, I never heard Hillary complain that the emails were altered. I'm sure she would've been quite vocal about that, if that were the case
 
Back
Top