The Obamagood Thread

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Sorry, I provided citation and official US documents as evidence.

All you've got is "Nuh uhhHh!!!" LOL

Pathetic.

You provided no such thing. All I've got is someone asking me for reasons behind a decision I played no part in making, & all that person has is pathology (as in lying).

 

[BotanyBoy]

You provided no such thing.

Yes I did, repeatedly and to no end because you're so (D) biased facts don't matter to you.

All I've got is someone asking me for reasons behind a decision I played no part in making.

Nope that's all in your head.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Yes I did, repeatedly and to no end because you're so (D) biased facts don't matter to you.

I'm not biased toward either party, but you provided them to no end because you provided them without a start.

Nope that's all in your head.

Whereas what's in your head changes when the wind blows.

 

[phrodeau]

Other than the fact that you were defending his award.

And you just felt some compulsive need to protect Obama's honor as a man of peace for whatever reason.

I think that reason is blind (D) partisanship.



FYP.



Idk much about that situation and I don't really care about accusations.

I care about civil rights being pushed aside for the convenience of summary executions.

Better get to work on the inmates at Guantanamo, then.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I'm not biased toward either party

As soon as I see you ignore reality for a republican like you did for Obama I'll buy that till then I think you're full of it.

but you provided them to no end because you provided them without a start.

The start was your denial that Obama had turned our military's weapons of war upon our own people.

And your subsequent rejection of POTUS himself admitting to it, every media outlet on the planet reporting it and Congress getting their panties in a bunch over it.

Whereas what's in your head changes when the wind blows.

And there are the childish insults.
http://i.imgur.com/DGFzv.gif

Better get to work on the inmates at Guantanamo, then.

Which ones are US citizens?

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

As soon as I see you ignore reality for a republican like you did for Obama I'll buy that till then I think you're full of it.

Well, I haven't ignored reality for anyone of any party ever, & I think it's been quite some time since you actually thought anything...

As a matter of fact, every time a doctor takes a look in your ears, they see this:

The page you are looking for is unavailable. Please try again later.

The start was your denial that Obama had turned our military's weapons of war upon our own people.

And your subsequent rejection of POTUS himself admitting to it, every media outlet on the planet reporting it and Congress getting their panties in a bunch over it.

I ignore the second, since the first never happened... I may have doubted it, but unlike you, I never claimed something was a fact that was not.

And there are the childish insults.

Google "insult to children", & you get:

Did you mean: comparison to BotanyBoy ?

On a side-note, "Parks & Rec" gifs are a little outdated to most of us... Discussions of that by the majority of people are not referring to your getting wrecked & going to a park to get a date now that Chris Hansen has another job.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Well, I haven't ignored reality for anyone of any party ever, & I think it's been quite some time since you actually thought anything...
As a matter of fact, every time a doctor takes a look in your ears, they see this:
The page you are looking for is unavailable. Please try again later.

Google "insult to children", & you get:

Did you mean: comparison to BotanyBoy ?

On a side-note, "Parks & Rec" gifs are a little outdated to most of us... Discussions of that by the majority of people are not referring to your getting wrecked & going to a park to get a date now that Chris Hansen has another job.

Oh look....more childish shit talk.

I ignore.

I know that's what I've been saying.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Oh look....more childish shit talk.

Shouldn't you be responding to what I write, not your own?!

I know that's what I've been saying.

I pay no attention to what you've been saying since I'm used to it being BS.

 

[dan_c00000]

Idk much about that situation

That's a massive understatement.

You don't know shit about shit but you've got an opinion on everything.

 

[Hard_Rom]

That's a massive understatement.

You don't know shit about shit but you've got an opinion on everything.

Knowledge and intelligence are not prerequisites for an opinion.

 

[Hard_Rom]

Seems to be doing a good job. Site has enough reservations to be not overly partisan.

http://www.snopes.com/barack-obama-accomplishments/

An Internet meme touts the economic achievements of United States President Barack Obama.

Mostly true

 

[dan_c00000]

Knowledge and intelligence are not prerequisites for an opinion.

Yeah, that's true.

 

[underguy1]

Seems to be doing a good job. Site has enough reservations to be not overly partisan.

http://www.snopes.com/barack-obama-accomplishments/

An Internet meme touts the economic achievements of United States President Barack Obama.

Mostly true

The slowest and weakest recovery from recession since records began?

Way to go Barack.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Seems to be doing a good job.

At making the rich richer LOL

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

At making the rich richer LOL

As well as the poor.

So who makes you & the other stupid people dumber?! Wait... You don't even know that.

 

[BotanyBoy]

As well as the poor.

Overall total yes they make an insignificant, not even keeping up with inflation, sliding backwards in terms of buying power and upward mobility teeny bit more.

Unlike the upper crust who in the past 8 years have made ASTRONOMICALLY HUGE fortunes.

Proportionally speaking they aren't even comparable.

How could they be when the 1% pays the government to hold the 99% down while they butt fuck them dry?

Isn't socialism great!!!

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

How could they be when the 1% pays the government to hold the 99% down while they butt fuck them dry?

They couldn't, probably, which is why that's great it's not the case, & you're getting those so-called facts out of your own butt!

Isn't socialism great!!!

Better than communism, which failed (USSR-Sorry), whatever GB had (Brexit & Scotland's potential independence), & several others that seem to have failed before they were even named.

 

[BotanyBoy]

They couldn't, probably, which is why that's great it's not the case.

Enjoying the Kool Aid??

Sorry, the poor haven't effectively gained any ground in over 20 years.

Not even under Obama, who turns out is a BIG TIME corporatist and not at all a liberal, progressive or a socialist.

Better than communism

I agree, but not by much, it's just diet communism until the full flavor takes effect.

& several others that seem to have failed before they were even named.

For the most part governments and economies are what the people make of them with few exceptions.

There are examples of success and failure all around.

 

[phrodeau]

President Obama addresses the audience at the final White House concert.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2mH6a8ydOQ

 

[sr71plt]

President Obama addresses the audience at the final White House concert.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2mH6a8ydOQ

Always a class act.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Enjoying the Kool Aid??

Sorry, the poor haven't effectively gained any ground in over 20 years.

Are YOU referring to those poor financially or intellectually? You are maybe the former & certainly the latter (which has new ones born every minute & more made as long as "home-schooling" is still legal).

Not even under Obama, who turns out is a BIG TIME corporatist and not at all a liberal, progressive or a socialist.

You claim him to certainly be one & not at all the others... Yet just like the Nobel discussion, you ask for proof from others & state none for your own claims.

I agree, but not by much, it's just diet communism until the full flavor takes effect.

There is no flavor, same as there is no communism.

For the most part governments and economies are what the people make of them with few exceptions.

For the most part, governments are what they make themselves as (next month's election shows) people can only choose between the candidates they are given, which often includes no good options.

There are examples of success and failure all around.

Agreed. However, neither is inevitable nor incapable of becoming the other.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Are YOU referring to those poor financially or intellectually? You are maybe the former & certainly the latter (which has new ones born every minute & more made as long as "home-schooling" is still legal).

The numerous degrees and the material goods say otherwise.

You claim him to certainly be one & not at all the others... Yet just like the Nobel discussion, you ask for proof from others & state none for your own claims.

I didn't ask for proof.

Here is mine though. Name one piece of legislation he signed that wasn't a complete mega-corp 1% enriching ass kiss?

There is no flavor, same as there is no communism.

Everyone in the real world thinks otherwise.

For the most part, governments are what they make themselves as (next month's election shows) people can only choose between the candidates they are given, which often includes no good options.

And government's are representative of their people.

No they decide to choose between D or R because that's what they are told to do.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

The numerous degrees and the material goods say otherwise.

I long ago added this to the list of things you claim with no proof.

I didn't ask for proof.

You asked me for proof many times that he deserved the Nobel even though we seemed to agree I played no part in saying he earned nor deserved it. When I used this agreed-upon reason to say I needn't give proof, you claimed that's b/c it doesn't exist, & used that as your proof he didn't deserve it.

Here is mine though. Name one piece of legislation he signed that wasn't a complete mega-corp 1% enriching ass kiss?

That is your... Request for yet another thing from me, seemingly proof again of something I never claimed. Again, you turn the responsibility on me, claiming it as your proof when in actuality, we both know it to be a request & a distraction from the fact you have made several claims (that you claim are facts, whether they are in truth opinions or outright falsehoods) that you have no proof for.

Everyone in the real world thinks otherwise.

"Otherwise" as opposed to the way you feel (not think)? I agree.

And government's are representative of their people.

Aside from the needless apostrophe, I notice this is yet again not in the post I clicked to "quote". (It needn't be, as it is still more bull.)

No they decide to choose between D or R because that's what they are told to do.

Or forced... Not all states have write-ins & other such options.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I long ago added this to the list of things you claim with no proof.

Whatever you want to think, you're great at just making shit up about me.

Fuck you even tried to claim you could read my mind.

You asked me for proof many times that he deserved the Nobel.

No I asked you to explain your reason why you think a warmongering murderer deserved a Nobel peace prize.

Request for yet another thing from me.

It's a question, not a request for a thing.

If you can't answer it that's fine and exactly what I expected.

Or forced... Not all states have write-ins & other such options.

If a candidate can't handle the bureaucracy they are in the wrong line of work. Nobody here is forced to vote for shit.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Whatever you want to think, you're great at just making shit up about me.

You can't know that as I never tried... Though it'd be fair, since you make things up constantly about average Americans & nationally-known figures.

Fuck you even tried to claim you could read my mind.

Have they put it into Braille yet? No. It would need to exist first.

No I asked you to explain your reason why you think a warmongering murderer deserved a Nobel peace prize.

No you asked me for a reason, something I never claimed to have.

It's a question, not a request for a thing.

If you can't answer it that's fine and exactly what I expected.

It's a request for an explanation of a reason I never stated nor claimed to have.

Also, you never expect things, simply claim them without proof & then ask others for proof of their claims, whether or not those people ever even made those claims.

If a candidate can't handle the bureaucracy they are in the wrong line of work. Nobody here is forced to vote for shit.

No, or you'd surely be running... But last I knew, the voting public was not in a political line of work.