Budding Breasts

[NoJo]

After reading the thread about underage rules, I'm a little worried about my own budding breasts - If I describe them in a story will it get rejected?

 

[ChloeTzang]

...........

 

[CyranoJ]

"Budding" breasts are not interchangeable with "small breasts" or "tiny breasts." "Budding" means they are pubescent, in the process of growing. I suspect this crops up a fair amount with writers who do not understand what the term actually implies. The answer is simply not to use the word "budding" when describing the breasts of an adult woman, no matter their size.

(Of course if you actually have "budding" breasts then barring the really unusual, it would seem to follow that you're not old enough to be writing or reading on Literotica?)

 

[NoJo]

"Budding" breasts are not interchangeable with "small breasts" or "tiny breasts." "Budding" means they are pubescent, in the process of growing. I suspect this crops up a fair amount with writers who do not understand what the term actually implies. The answer is simply not to use the word "budding" when describing the breasts of an adult woman, no matter their size.

(Of course if you actually have "budding" breasts then barring the really unusual, it would seem to follow that you're not old enough to be writing or reading on Literotica?)

I have a mental age of 11, but luckily that doesn't count

 

[CyranoJ]

Heh. Fair enough.

 

[Dream_Operator]

As long as you're a guy and they're Man Boobs, I think you're okay.

 

[TxRad]

As long as you're a guy and they're Man Boobs, I think you're okay.

That's Jo.

 

[lovecraft68]

After reading the thread about underage rules, I'm a little worried about my own budding breasts - If I describe them in a story will it get rejected?

Budding breasts in an adult man are called man boobs. Try exercising and staying in shape and it won't be a problem. Or just remain an out of shape slob.

 

[NoJo]

Budding breasts in an adult man are called man boobs. Try exercising and staying in shape and it won't be a problem. Or just remain an out of shape slob.

Tough call

 

[CyranoJ]

http://i224.photobucket.com/albums/dd107/RobertDobolinaEsq/VH74D.gif

 

[lovecraft68]

This is literotica and their 'rules' in a nutshell. I presented proof there are countless underage stories on this site using a term that pretty much everyone's knee jerk reaction is underage.

I posted links and showed proof.

Did Laurel show up with an explanation? No. Did the mod pop in to weigh in? Not only no, but they took advantage of one poster being a bit of a dink to close the thread.

How convenient it was closed.

A site that has people getting up on their high horse when someone asks about age limits and saying "go to asstr for that" and becoming belligerent because they care so much about 'underage stories"

Well they just exposed the opposite. They don't give a rats ass. To the point that as always when presented with something factual there is a no response and a closed thread to boot.

Now one of the sites old time boot licks is going to come in and troll it. Yes Jo its hilarious lit allows underage stories here. Very funny.

And at this point any response by the mod or Laurel is moot, because it will be a case of now this post is the reason why.

Lits rule is simply this. Don't say under 18, but describe them anyway you want and with a wink we'll let it slide. At least that's what is being said here.

Sure, once in awhile they kick one back for appearances sake, but for that one there's who knows how many getting through.

Most damning thing is a thread asking about a scene and laurel posting a link and sitting on her horse "didn't pass in 2002, won't now" oh, please in 2002 there weren't that many stories going up and maybe she gave more of a fuck 14 years ago.

Meanwhile there was my thread right there a couple lines down from the page and she stayed clear of it.

What a joke.

Next time Zeb posts "take that shit to asstr" I'm going to reply what's the difference?

There is one of course. Asstr does not pretend to have rules they make little effort to enforce.

Thanks for opening the door for his Jo, no go hit the gym and get rid of your flabby tits.

 

[sr71plt]

Oh, god, here we go again.

The OP was cute. The moment has been ruined.

 

[ChloeTzang]

...........

 

[sr71plt]

Gosh!

You do realize that the OP was posted just to be cute, don't you?

 

[TxRad]

You do realize that the OP was posted just to be cute, don't you?

Knowing Jo, it could be a little of both.

 

[holliday1960]

Hmmm....I could have a lot to say on this. I started reading on Lit back when it was new. There were some pretty shocking stories here. And I don't shock easily. I'm not sure when they decided to put on the brakes to bestiality, underage, etc. But, as lovecraft said in the above vent, it doesnt really matter.
If you want an example, go read Sisters of the Fallen in the halloween competition. If you read carefully you will see it was written about sisters who are/were underage, although the author cleaned it up a bit and reposted it.
It still smacks of underage, despite his change of a girl married at 16 to now 18. The references to "childhood games" involving incest clearly rings of underage, as do references to the second oldest daughter running to her sister's bed instead of mama's for comfort during a storm. I question the conflict of them ceasing the practice when the second daughter married at even the revised age of 18. That means their activities took place prior to her being 18 in my book.
Then there's the third daughter who has sex with two men in the early pages, while the father is still living and that also clearly places her underage since the parents died according to the author, one year after the 18 year old married.
All of my historical pieces won't ever pass the censor(s). I know that, so I don't even think about posting them. For some, with less respect for the rules, they seem to like flaunting their disregard. Don't get me wrong...the story is great. And it is leading in the competition. But, rules are rules...unless they arent?

 

[ChloeTzang]

...........

 

[TxRad]

Hmmm....I could have a lot to say on this. I started reading on Lit back when it was new. There were some pretty shocking stories here. And I don't shock easily. I'm not sure when they decided to put on the brakes to bestiality, underage, etc. But, as lovecraft said in the above vent, it doesnt really matter.
If you want an example, go read Sisters of the Fallen in the halloween competition. If you read carefully you will see it was written about sisters who are/were underage, although the author cleaned it up a bit and reposted it.
It still smacks of underage, despite his change of a girl married at 16 to now 18. The references to "childhood games" involving incest clearly rings of underage, as do references to the second oldest daughter running to her sister's bed instead of mama's for comfort during a storm. I question the conflict of them ceasing the practice when the second daughter married at even the revised age of 18. That means their activities took place prior to her being 18 in my book.
Then there's the third daughter who has sex with two men in the early pages, while the father is still living and that also clearly places her underage since the parents died according to the author, one year after the 18 year old married.
All of my historical pieces won't ever pass the censor(s). I know that, so I don't even think about posting them. For some, with less respect for the rules, they seem to like flaunting their disregard. Don't get me wrong...the story is great. And it is leading in the competition. But, rules are rules...unless they arent?

There used to be another part to Lit. I don't remember what they called it but it had all the stuff that you mentioned. They did away with it a little before i got here if i remember correctly.

 

[holliday1960]

There used to be another part to Lit. I don't remember what they called it but it had all the stuff that you mentioned. They did away with it a little before i got here if i remember correctly.

When I first started reading on Lit, some of those were choices in the genre's. Bestiality was a legitimate tag. You didnt have to go to much effort hunting for them. They were on practically every page.
I didnt realize so many women had a fetish for their pets. And, It was nothing to read of Hanzel and Gretal's sexual exploits with that nasty old witch, or Dorothy and toto and the cowardly lion...or Peter Pan and the Lost Boys. There was a multitude of stories that were written as 'truth' versus fiction that clearly contained minors. Mostly daddy/daughter stories.
When I rejoined a couple of years ago, all that had changed. It was obvious to me that there had been some complaints along the way. Maybe some of the site's sponsors decided to draw a line at some point. (Back then, there were no sponsors. No ads. No links to other partnered sites.)

 

[sr71plt]

I doubted that "bestiality" ever was a tag here, so I did a tag search. Sure enough. Four stories, but all since 2011. But it's interesting that Lit. allows the tag, if not the content, and lets actual stories with that tag post.

 

[holliday1960]

I doubted that "bestiality" ever was a tag here, so I did a tag search. Sure enough. Four stories, but all since 2011. But it's interesting that Lit. allows the tag, if not the content, and lets actual stories with that tag post.

What? You actually DOUBTED me??? I wouldn't lie to you, sr! So...how does one write a story about bestiality without actually screwing a goat??? Maybe goat on unicorn sex? Fiction or non-fiction?

 

[Hypoxia]

Budding female breasts over age 18 probably indicates a genetic issue.
Budding male breasts over age 18 probably indicates a dietary issue.
Budding bestial breasts over age 18 likely indicates a species issue.
Budding female breasts on LIT likely indicates an underage issue.

So...how does one write a story about bestiality without actually screwing a goat??? Maybe goat on unicorn sex? Fiction or non-fiction?

It seems okay here to screw talking animals. Make sure 1) they consent and 2) somebody besides the fucker hears them talk. Dolly the sheep can't merely send telepathic messages to Sam the horny shepherd. If Dolly is narrating, have her do the NY Times daily crossword puzzle. On paper.

I don't know if you could get away with a were-sheep -- grazing placidly by day, then dirty-dancing under the full moon. Maybe a were-donkey? Or, since he's a jackass anyway, transplant Mr Tromp's brain into a burro and set him loose insulting and assaulting Latina farmworkers. But none with budding breasts.

 

[stickygirl]

Don't joke about were-sheep: they are very real down where I come from. Some fool-hardy people have been nibbled to death in the course of a moonlit night

 

[Hypoxia]

Don't joke about were-sheep: they are very real down where I come from. Some fool-hardy people have been nibbled to death in the course of a moonlit night

When do they start to bud? BTW low-flying pilots have a term for sheep: range maggots, 'cause that's what they look like from above.

I hope I haven't offended too many shepherds. Now I lay me down to sheep...

 

[holliday1960]

When do they start to bud? BTW low-flying pilots have a term for sheep: range maggots, 'cause that's what they look like from above.

I hope I haven't offended too many shepherds. Now I lay me down to sheep...

Please don't mention sheep-herders!!! I still remember that one story about a woman and her german sheep-herder!!! Of course, he spoke fluent english with an accent, so that made it ok I suppose.