The Trump Campaign #2: The Best Thread On The GB, Believe Me

What happened to all the good Republican oppo people? Dead like Lee Atwater? Moved to Russia? How did 16 other campaigns miss all this stuff on Trump? Hell, Trump was talking to Jeb Bush's nephew. He's been living openly as a degenerate for 35 years.

They decided to nominate the clown and wait for the inevitable. Sad!

The Clintons have always had a great opposition research operation. I'm guessing they have a barrel load of stuff but are keeping their powder dry until nearer Nov 8th.
 
The one thing I've been 100% certain about from day one in connection with this election is that I won't be voting for Hillary Clinton. I was about 99% certain I wouldn't be voting for Donald Trump, either, until now. Trump's vast array of opponents may yet convince me to vote for him, the way things are going.

Well, alrighty. I don't think you need have bothered to tell us that. No one is holding a gun to your head to make you vote for her, and your posts aren't convincing much of anyone to switch to your pinheaded hates and reasoning to maybe vote for Twerp either, I don't think. If they do, that's their privilege and irresponsibility. In most places, you can write in whoever you want. Have a ball.
 
Well, alrighty. I don't think you need have bothered to tell us that. No one is holding a gun to your head to make you vote for her, and your posts aren't convincing much of anyone to switch to your pinheaded hates and reasoning to maybe vote for Twerp either, I don't think. If they do, that's their privilege and irresponsibility. In most places, you can write in whoever you want. Have a ball.

The one good thing about this election is those of you who vote for Hillary Clinton will have to live with the consequences if she wins.
 
The Clintons have always had a great opposition research operation. I'm guessing they have a barrel load of stuff but are keeping their powder dry until nearer Nov 8th.

I'm pretty sure that Hillary's comment at the first debate of Trump liking to be close to beauty contests was something dangled out there for him to chomp on and let her open up to his sexual escapades. He didn't take that particular bait because he became obsessed with the related fat Miss Universe issue. Since then, Hillary's got a whole lot more to dump on him about sex and wandering husband when/if he goes after Bill on Sunday. And Trump is too obsessed and blind about the issue not to go after sex in Hillary's past.

Bring the popcorn.
 
The one good thing about this election is those of you who vote for Hillary Clinton will have to live with the consequences if she wins.

I'm looking forward to it and to daily making the comparisons on what could have been if almost anyone else running for the office this time had won the election instead (I'm not that sure that O'Mally or Jeb Bush, or Kasich would have given me heartburn--the rest would) and smiling. Even when she does something I don't like, which she inevitably will, I'll smile about how much worse it would have been with almost any one else in the running being there.

Thanks. You hit on exactly what I'm increasingly becoming relieved about. :)

I'll also think back on all of the dummies here at Literotica who Chicken Littled and Swiftboated her existence. I'll give you a special little smile, toubab. :D

That said, toubab, I'm willing to bet I would survive a Trump presidency better than you would. I'm retired, well fixed, well protected, and even own a residence and assets abroad that I could manage on for the remainder of my life while it slowly dawns on you what a Trump presidency would mean to you. It's not me or my class that he's going to screw. :)
 
Last edited:
The one good thing about this election is those of you who vote for Hillary Clinton will have to live with the consequences if she wins.

Thanks for your concern, I believe I can do that.
 
The one good thing about this election is those of you who vote for Hillary Clinton will have to live with the consequences if she wins.

Laughing at a bunch of whiny assholes isn't really considered consequences.
 
CNN Cut Big 3rd Party Support From Debate Focus Group Coverage, Participant Says

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...-debate-focus-group-coverage-participant-says



"A participant in the CNN focus group conducted Tuesday during this year's only vice presidential debate says the cable network omitted a strong showing of third-party support.

Justin Smith says participants were asked after the debate ended if they support the ticket led by Democrat Hillary Clinton, Republican Donald Trump or a third-party candidate, with 12 indicating third-party support, five backing Clinton and two Trump.

Such a result would not reflect national polling, and Smith wrote on Facebook "once they saw the response," the third party option was dropped in favor of "undecided" -- with the second question asked twice before being aired live, yielding 11 votes for “undecided.”

“As you see a majority here in this room at the University of Richmond still undecided," CNN reporter Pamela Brown told anchor Wolf Blitzer in the segment that aired.

“Interesting stuff,” Blitzer said."




Disgusting.
 
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...-debate-focus-group-coverage-participant-says



"A participant in the CNN focus group conducted Tuesday during this year's only vice presidential debate says the cable network omitted a strong showing of third-party support.

Justin Smith says participants were asked after the debate ended if they support the ticket led by Democrat Hillary Clinton, Republican Donald Trump or a third-party candidate, with 12 indicating third-party support, five backing Clinton and two Trump.

Such a result would not reflect national polling, and Smith wrote on Facebook "once they saw the response," the third party option was dropped in favor of "undecided" -- with the second question asked twice before being aired live, yielding 11 votes for “undecided.”

“As you see a majority here in this room at the University of Richmond still undecided," CNN reporter Pamela Brown told anchor Wolf Blitzer in the segment that aired.

“Interesting stuff,” Blitzer said."




Disgusting.


You left out the part where another person claiming to be in the group said that was hog wash--that it never happened. Watch the followup to see if more claimed it happened, as they surely will say, if it did.

And, sorry, 12 people out of an "undecided" group this size in Richmond, where Kaine was a popular mayor, then a popular governor, and now a popular U.S. senator, aren't suddenly going to declare third party after that vice presidential debate. It's not believable. When all else fails, try common sense. (As I posted elsewhere, though, I think it was strange to have the focus group in Richmond to begin with. That seems like stacking the deck to me. Of course, neither you nor the other crazies here will acknowledge that I did say I thought some manipulation--or dumbness--was involved on CNN's part.)

You got some more garbage you can try out here?
 
Last edited:
You left out the part where another person claiming to be in the group said that was hog wash--that it never happened. Watch the followup to see if more claimed it happened, as they surely will say, if it did.

And, sorry, 12 people out of an "undecided" group this size in Richmond, where Kaine was a popular mayor, then a popular governor, and now a popular U.S. senator, aren't suddenly going to declare third party after that vice presidential debate. It's not believable. When all else fails, try common sense. (As I posted elsewhere, though, I think it was strange to have the focus group in Richmond to begin with. That seems like stacking the deck to me.)

You got some more garbage you can try out here?

I just read the article again, and I don't see the part you say I left out. Here is something, however, I did leave out:

"CNN spokespeople would not offer an on-the-record response, but did not refute the description of events offered by Smith."

You are in the tank for Hillary way too deep.
 
The one good thing about this election is those of you who vote for Hillary Clinton will have to live with the consequences if she wins.

One of the consequences of her winning will be that a lot of people will die.
 
I just read the article again, and I don't see the part you say I left out. Here is something, however, I did leave out:

"CNN spokespeople would not offer an on-the-record response, but did not refute the description of events offered by Smith."

You are in the tank for Hillary way too deep.

Guess your source cut the rest of the story out, then. I'm here in Virginia. I saw fuller versions.

Here's probably what happened. In the first take, Dana Bash misspoke "third party" rather than "undecided" and they just misheard and put their hands up. So, they had to redo it and the one adamant "third party" guy didn't put his hand up and reported it as manipulation. The rest understood what had happened and did the retake without a problem--and none have verified the "third party" guy's take on it.

One thing that's funny, though, is that you just breeze through my suggestion that CNN was manipulating the focus group in another direction. And you either breezed through it because your unbelievable and excerpted for convenience version is jazzier or because your dogged partisanship can't accept that I balance my posts here. Either way, it just shows you are trying too hard with too little ammunition (and smarts).

Which leads to the other funny aspect. You and your guys here have to go after the lies and exaggerations here in support of Mr. Twerp, whereas those of us thinking the whole Twerp thing is a ghastly joke revealing basic U.S. behavioral problems only have to replay what the Twerp actually says and does to make the point. :D

Doesn't make a hill of beans, however. Virginia is going to go Clinton-Kaine. You can take that to the bank. So third party/undecided means nothing in who gets Virginia's electoral votes. The whole story is just there to titillate you deplorable losers.
 
Guess your source cut the rest of the story out, then. I'm here in Virginia. I saw fuller versions.

Here's probably what happened. In the first take, Dana Bash misspoke "third party" rather than "undecided" and they just misheard and put their hands up. So, they had to redo it and the one adamant "third party" guy didn't put his hand up and reported it as manipulation. The rest understood what had happened and did the retake without a problem--and none have verified the "third party" guy's take on it.

One thing that's funny, though, is that you just breeze through my suggestion that CNN was manipulating the focus group in another direction. And you either breezed through it because your unbelievable and excerpted for convenience version is jazzier or because your dogged partisanship can't accept that I balance my posts here. Either way, it just shows you are trying too hard with too little ammunition (and smarts).

Which leads to the other funny aspect. You and your guys here have to go after the lies and exaggerations here in support of Mr. Twerp, whereas those of us thinking the whole Twerp thing is a ghastly joke revealing basic U.S. behavioral problems only have to replay what the Twerp actually says and does to make the point. :D

Doesn't make a hill of beans, however. Virginia is going to go Clinton-Kaine. You can take that to the bank. So third party/undecided means nothing in who gets Virginia's electoral votes. The whole story is just there to titillate you deplorable losers.

Apparently you think I'm too stupid to realize CNN is in the tank for Hillary. Well, you're wrong if you think that, genius. Of course they stacked the deck in her favor. They do it all the fucking time. I didn't think it necessary to comment on something so obvious and so to be expected.

If Hillary wins, and she probably will, you and your ilk will be responsible. I won't be, thank God. I've made a lot of mistakes in my life, but helping to elect her president won't be one of them.
 
Apparently you think I'm too stupid to realize CNN is in the tank for Hillary. Well, you're wrong if you think that, genius. Of course they stacked the deck in her favor. They do it all the fucking time. I didn't think it necessary to comment on something so obvious and so to be expected.

If Hillary wins, and she probably will, you and your ilk will be responsible. I won't be, thank God. I've made a lot of mistakes in my life, but helping to elect her president won't be one of them.

No, I hadn't thought of you being stupid for that reason. There are so many other reasons to think you are stupid. I hadn't gotten around to that one yet. :D
 
What happened to all the good Republican oppo people? Dead like Lee Atwater? Moved to Russia? How did 16 other campaigns miss all this stuff on Trump? Hell, Trump was talking to Jeb Bush's nephew. He's been living openly as a degenerate for 35 years.

They decided to nominate the clown and wait for the inevitable. Sad!

I believe that Kasich didn't want to get so far down in this gutter, and that the rest of them were too busy counting the votes that Trump was registering in the their own column in the general election, and didn't want to alienate them.

Well, that and ReiNCe PRieBuS was telling them not to go for each other's throats which would result in a damaged nominee in the general election and a potential loss.

After the CEO Con leads the GOP to defeat, who will remain steadfast to a party that has alienated most women? The TheoCons or the NeoCons?
 
Back
Top