The Trumper List - See if the member you're talking to was / is one

[underguy1]

Here it is, for reference / parody purposes - a list of those who have, in their Literotica commentary, outwardly supported Donald Trump. I use "Trumper" to describe his supporters, since that term is used by both left and right-wing publications. After all, let's be fair.

Because of the chaotic nature of responses to this election, it's time-consuming to wade through it all. Also, after the election is over, some will attempt to gloss over and talk past their previous allegiances. Since the Trumpers on this forum have shown during Trump's candidacy that they celebrate key tenets of labeling, profiling, "scarlet lettering" people such as Muslims, tout HUAC, etc., and have no issues with a man who holds these concepts so dearly, I can only assume they will respect this thread.

Post suggestions (and evidence, if necessary) on who should be added. Trumpers: if you wish to be added, let me know. I expect you will want to self-identify.

If Clinton wasn't such a dreadful, dangerous candidate, you'd probably have a fair point.

But she is. So it's hypocritical of her boosters and shills.

Trump is trying to throw the election to her but she's barely ahead in the polls. And the polls are almost certainly being skewed to her.

Ask your self what is it you are voting for?

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

^^^ Notice how he continually tap dances around who he supports. Lot of that going on around here.

But hai, he'll continue to bash Hillary right until Election Day and probably beyond.

I'll vote for Hillary...She's not my first or second choice, but she is the best choice available for America, in my opinion

What are you getting at, he's too afraid to say he is a Trump supporter?

Why would anyone care about stating that on an anonymous website? Do you think people might lose sleep worrying about what various Lit handles think about them?

 

[RoryN]

What are you getting at, he's too afraid to say he is a Trump supporter?

Why would anyone care about stating that on an anonymous website?

Losing arguments ("...but you support Trump.")

For some on here, that = death.

 

[RobDownSouth]

What are you getting at, he's too afraid to say he is a Trump supporter?

Exactly.

Why would anyone care about stating that on an anonymous website? Do you think people might lose sleep worrying about what various Lit handles think about them?

Yes, yes, tell us once again how you are voting third party, and how you are too personally virtuous to stain your hands with the evil that is the “establishment” candidate.

p.s. Black Lives Matter!

 

[Killswitch1]

Here it is, for reference / parody purposes - a list of those who have, in their Literotica commentary, outwardly supported Donald Trump. I use "Trumper" to describe his supporters, since that term is used by both left and right-wing publications. After all, let's be fair.

Because of the chaotic nature of responses to this election, it's time-consuming to wade through it all. Also, after the election is over, some will attempt to gloss over and talk past their previous allegiances. Since the Trumpers on this forum have shown during Trump's candidacy that they celebrate key tenets of labeling, profiling, "scarlet lettering" people such as Muslims, tout HUAC, etc., and have no issues with a man who holds these concepts so dearly, I can only assume they will respect this thread.

Post suggestions (and evidence, if necessary) on who should be added. Trumpers: if you wish to be added, let me know. I expect you will want to self-identify.

To be added to / edited when necessary:

AJ / 4est
snugglestruggle
toubab
BB
Beco
Libsam
Ishmael
NeverEndingMe
GimpyIntellect
Que (and alts)
PatriotLover
renard_ruse
akatrex
contrifan32
VaticanAssassin
RUlookingup
eyer
JBJ
lovecraft68

I want to know what women support him. I know they're here.

 

[Killswitch1]

If Clinton wasn't such a dreadful, dangerous candidate, you'd probably have a fair point.

But she is. So it's hypocritical of her boosters and shills.

Trump is trying to throw the election to her but she's barely ahead in the polls. And the polls are almost certainly being skewed to her.

Ask your self what is it you are voting for?

Clinton dangerous? lol Please and believe these polls al you want....come election day Hillary wins by 10 points.

 

[Stewart_Pidd]

Clinton dangerous? lol Please and believe these polls al you want....come election day Hillary wins by 10 points.

so a touchdown and a field goal bro?

Stew

 

[Hypoxia]

A liberal would be all for free speech of any kind and would uphold the 2nd as a right of the people to defend themselves against government tyranny.

The 2nd was not about resisting govt tyranny, but prohibiting the arbitrarily exclusion of groups from bearing arms in defense of the country as part of a "well-regulated militia", as Britain had banned groups from their military. Founders distrusted standing armies, hence the militia. The everybody-gets-a-firearm trope is a willful misinterpretation, akin to a law clerk's note that established corporations as people. Now those interpretations are embedded in law. Stare decisis is a nasty bitch.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Losing arguments ("...but you support Trump.")

For some on here, that = death.

How does "...but you support Trump" equate to the loss of an argument?

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Exactly.



Yes, yes, tell us once again how you are voting third party, and how you are too personally virtuous to stain your hands with the evil that is the “establishment” candidate.

p.s. Black Lives Matter!

Virtuous? I fuck guys 20 years younger than me, party late nights with booze and drugs... there are a lot of stains on my hands. I wouldn't shake my hands with your dick.

There is a life outside of this place, seek it out sometime.

I await your purple hashtag attack in a 20pt font accusing me of "ascription".

 

[RoryN]

How does "...but you support Trump" equate to the loss of an argument?

As an answer to arguments containing the following:

"I'm not sexist."

"I don't respect bullies."

"I'm not racist."

"I believe in facts."

"I'm not xenophobic."

"I believe in fair business practices."

 

[Not Normal]

btw, I was classically trained on Bb clarinet, a composers instrument.

I'm a Woodwinder.

I did not know that.

Do you mean fat chicks as an example? Why yes i do shame them. It's fun for me because I'm an asshole.

What does that have to do with the media attempting to use shame to manipulate the public into voting a certain way?

What does this have to do with media outlets dropping all pretense about being fair and impartial and going on the attack against a presidential candidate and his probable voters?

For instance, How does an asshole with a computer (me) possible compare to a supposed news/media outlet putting the following at the end of every article about Trump:

So you're saying its OK for you to be an asshole, but its not OK for the media to report that Trump is an asshole.

The things in your attachment aren't false. As St Pete points out below.

The media is calling it like the media sees it. Donald mocking the disabled, donald being a douchebag to women, donald stealing money from people trying to attend his crap school, donald...

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

I did not know that.

So you're saying its OK for you to be an asshole, but its not OK for the media to report that Trump is an asshole.

Correct. I am an individual person who has no ability to shape/manipulate public opinion. People do not look to me as a source for unbiased factual information. I am not a reporter or journalist who also is a member of powerful globalist organization like the Council on Foreign Relations, an organization whom HRC proudly admits tells her what to do and how to think.

I'm just an asshole with a laptop. The label "asshole" is subjective and as such is not a term that should appear in a "news" source.

The things in your attachment aren't false. As St Pete points out below.

The things in the attachment are subjective. They do not belong at the end of "news" article. An editorial page, go right ahead.

The media used to pretend to have standards.

I don't know why no one can see it, but today you may agree with the message... but next time you won't. But then it will be too late,

 

[silver gurl]

Personally, I don't like any of the choices. I think they are all a big mistake.

With that being said, I don't argue about whom people chose to vote for. It is the freedom of America. It is your choice. Just try not to fuck it up even more.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Personally, I don't like any of the choices. I think they are all a big mistake.

With that being said, I don't argue about whom people chose to vote for. It is the freedom of America. It is your choice. Just try not to fuck it up even more.

100% agree with you.

That's a rare thing at Lit.

 

[BotanyBoy]

As an answer to arguments containing the following:

"I'm not sexist."

"I don't respect bullies."

"I'm not racist."

"I believe in facts."

"I'm not xenophobic."

"I believe in fair business practices."

And what about the Trump fans?

That's not JUST Clinton you know Trump does does most of those things too....

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

As an answer to arguments containing the following:

"I'm not sexist."

"I don't respect bullies."

"I'm not racist."

"I believe in facts."

"I'm not xenophobic."

"I believe in fair business practices."

Yeah... A lot of this list can applied to Hrc.

 

[OldJourno]

The premise that the media's job is to be impartial (as was pointed out before) is a false one. The media started in the United States with Thomas Jefferson buying newspaper space (and expanding circulation) to hurl insults at Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, who, in turn, paid other newspapers to hurl insults back--the types of really scurrilous insults that Trump is now moving into.

(Read Pasley's The Tyranny of Printers, for instance.)

You don't buy newspaper space to be impartial.

 

[RoryN]

Yeah... A lot of this list can applied to Hrc.

That's not JUST Clinton you know....

You two - or anyone else - are welcome to make a corresponding thread about Hillary fans.

But, since you won't, I'll solicit your excuses for not doing so in this thread (free bumps). Please tell us why such a thread would be futile / against your beliefs / unnecessary / ineffective, even though Clinton is supposedly a malevolent monster - in which case, people supporting her should be called out in equal fashion. Go!

 

[sr71plt]

You don't buy newspaper space to be impartial.

And the publisher owns all of the newspaper space.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You two - or anyone else - are welcome to make a corresponding thread about Hillary fans.

I'm just not a hysterical partisan in love with lying to myself, like a lot of folks.

But, since you won't, I'll solicit your excuses for not doing so in this thread (free bumps). Please tell us why such a thread would be futile / against your beliefs / unnecessary / ineffective, even though Clinton is supposedly a malevolent monster -

I don't think she's a malevolent monster.

She's practically a female Trump.

Racist...warmonger....xenophobic....homophobic.....misogynist...etc.

in which case, people supporting her should be called out in equal fashion. Go!

Nah, I'd rather just sit back and laugh at the people who think Saint Clinton is going to be the greatest POTUS of all time. Especially for the working class!!!

LMFAO.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

You two - or anyone else - are welcome to make a corresponding thread about Hillary fans.

But, since you won't, I'll solicit your excuses for not doing so in this thread (free bumps). Please tell us why such a thread would be futile / against your beliefs / unnecessary / ineffective, even though Clinton is supposedly a malevolent monster - in which case, people supporting her should be called out in equal fashion. Go!

I have no desire to make a negatuve thread about Hrc supporters because I respect your votes and what you choose to do with it. That you vote differently doesn't make me view you negatively at all.

You are being a bitch to the wrong person, you know I don't play these games.

 

[RoryN]

She's practically a female Trump.

And then:

Nah, I'd rather just sit back and laugh at the people who think Saint Clinton is going to be the greatest POTUS of all time.

"The people" = who? Cite them, please - as proof that you aren't being as melodramatic as your first statement suggests.

 

[BotanyBoy]

"The people" = who?

Boy Next Door seems to be convinced she's a champion of the little guy.

So does SR71, GSGS, I bet Phro is a true believer too.

And of course there are shit tons of youtube videos.

http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/112/507/6fa.jpg

Cite them, please.

No. I don't play fetch for racist, you can google/youtube yourself if you want.

 

[RoryN]

Boy Next Door seems to be convinced she's a champion of the little guy.

So does SR71, GSGS, I bet Phro is a true believer too.

Quote where they say "greatest of all time", drama llama.

Otherwise, we can just add this to your enormous and ever-growing bin of lies.

No. I don't play fetch...

= you lose; Internet 101. Thanks for playing!