CEO Shaming

Just a bit of background on the person that you keep sparring with, underguy.
I'll give you a hint: he's not black.

Because, after seeing the pics. and music that he keeps posting, and his badass hip hop references,
I was convinced for many, many months that he was black. :D

WTF?

I never thought he was black and I couldn't care less.

He's a lying, dishonest WUM.

And probably a paid shill for the FIRE industry.

All that military stuff is bullshit.
 
It wasn't related to the discussion.
It was about the song that he quoted which reminded me of what I mentioned before, and about the fact that his extroverted personality cracks me up!

Hei, relax. He's not like that. He's solid but he also likes to wind people up around political matters.
 
It wasn't related to the discussion.
It was about the song that he quoted which reminded me of what I mentioned before, and about the fact that his extroverted personality cracks me up!

Hei, relax. He's not like that. He's solid but he also likes to wind people up around political matters.

No. He's a cunt. He's not 'solid'. He is a cunt.

There are no redeeming features.

And your defending him is not looking good for you.
 
1.As in government and NGOs, there is a fair amount of corruption in corporations. CEOs act as the face of their corporations. Their boards are generally trying to avoid embarrassment and improve stock value, so they usually want to avoid negative publicity.

The changes that took place at Target following incidents of political indoctrination of employees started with CEO shaming, but were ultimately facilitated by the potential loss of revenue. The same thing is happening with Wells Fargo right now, but in this instance, having to do with corporate incentives to exploit customers with inappropriate fees.

2.Monopolistic corporations tend to be so buffered from economic consequences that they have very little sense of shame, similar to some of the trolls on the Lit boards. Where there is no sense of shame, there tends to be a normalization of bizarre behavior. In these cases, the shameless don't care if the attention they receive is positive or negative, since they mainly just want attention.

3.So, CEO shaming is an important accountability tool, but it does not work in all situations.


Re no. 2 :

Besides the top to bottom one, there's also the problem of horizontal violence as well.

The culture of many such institutions promotes a dysfunctional type of individualism and competitivenness and doesn't reward team spirit or lending a hand to your colleague. On top of that, the message to their employees often is: "You're just a nomber on a payroll; you're not valuable and you can be replaced at any time."
So in Some (not all, because overall I was lucky and had excellent experiences in that regard) cases you see backstabbing or people trying to undermine others for personal gain.

Workplace bullying has and will always exist, regardless of the system. But it tends to be even worse in institutions with those types of managers and culture.
Because on top of the above, some people feel dissatisfied and disempowered in all sorts of ways (remuneration for some, loss of meaning or feelong devalued for others) so they start taking it on each other.
 
Last edited:
No. I mean it. Go fuck yourself cunt.

You couldn't tell the truth if it was in your self interest.

LOL no.

And you just say that because you can't define capitalism, don't have the intellectual capacity for it.

WTF?

I never thought he was black and I couldn't care less.

He's a lying, dishonest WUM.

And probably a paid shill for the FIRE industry.

All that military stuff is bullshit.

What's a WUM?

I'm not a shill for anyone except myself bronado.
 
Well, I see you folks were busy while I was gone. Busy calling each other names and acting like dumb ass kids. If you are going to have a discussion on something than please do. Stop the playground teen age chest puffing and actually present some factual information. If it is your opinion be prepared to back it up. because is not an answer. And can someone please place a muzzle on #tags mug. I swear! Stereotyping people is a form of bigotry. :rolleyes:
 
No. He's a cunt. He's not 'solid'. He is a cunt.

There are no redeeming features.

Can we assume that you fancy yourself as having modest intellectual pretensions just a teeny bit to the left of centre?:D

I usta be a CEO and am all in favour of CEO shaming. It may be unfair sometimes but if it is invalid that will soon be apparent. If the criticism of the CEO is unfair and he doesn't deal with it - tough - he's clearly not up to that aspect of the job.
 
Can we assume that you fancy yourself as having modest intellectual pretensions just a teeny bit to the left of centre?:D

I usta be a CEO and am all in favour of CEO shaming. It may be unfair sometimes but if it is invalid that will soon be apparent. If the criticism of the CEO is unfair and he doesn't deal with it - tough - he's clearly not up to that aspect of the job.

Thank you for bringing things back on topic. :)
 
Just a bit of background on the person that you keep sparring with, underguy.
I'll give you a hint: he's not black.

Because, after seeing the pics. and music that he keeps posting, and his badass hip hop references,
I was convinced for many, many months that he was black. :D


Hei, your JBJ is showing.

Geeze, you try and jump in the middle of underdog and Botany Boy with a pist that confirms you're a racist POS. Well done!

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

/////
 
I know I was trying to get him to explain...SHHHH!!!

I don't think he can, he likes using words he doesn't know, like capitalism.

You claim to have read and studied Marx and Keynes yet your 'definition' of capitalism consists of the PR nonsense that capitalists use on the naive proles.

You are a compulsive liar and nothing you say is reliable.

You're a bullshit artist and a WUM. And probably a sociopath.
 
You claim to have read and studied Marx and Keynes yet your 'definition' of capitalism consists of the PR nonsense that capitalists use on the naive proles.

No my definition of capitalism consists of the definition of capitalism by pretty much every single economic definition of the term.

Just because I don't use the term interchanebly for 'the boogey man' or 'rich people and or shit I just don't like'......you know, the way you do, doesn't mean I haven't read Marx or Keynes.

And I'm not a proletariat, I get paid for holding paper and owning shit.

Not for working. Working is stupid, that's why I pay other people to do it.

You are a compulsive liar and nothing you say is reliable.

You're a bullshit artist and a WUM.

You only say that because I disagree with you and you can't handle that.

And you can't back any of it up.

And probably a sociopath.

Certainly some strong traits. Especially when it comes to money.
 
Last edited:
Underguy has run out of cogent thought.
Take that underguyey Mcundererguy underguy face.
I supect that sometimes he's serious (like his take on the world at large and and the GB, which are often eye-opening and spot on), and other times it's just tongue in cheek. Like now, a bit.
 
I supect that sometimes he's serious (like his take on the world at large and and the GB, which are often eye-opening and spot on), and other times it's just tongue in cheek. Like now, a bit.

This doesn't seem like tongue in cheek.
 
I supect that sometimes he's serious (like his take on the world at large and and the GB, which are often eye-opening and spot on), and other times it's just tongue in cheek. Like now, a bit.

No. I genuinely despise wums. And libertarians are just sadly stupid groupthinkers.

They just render any discourse pointless.

And he's not even a good one.

It's just the same memes repeated over and over.

To prove, argue, defend what?

Nothing.

He may have a higher IQ than NEM and L1tTleD1fferent but his contribution to debate is effectively the same.

Plus, he's a stinking, vile racist scumbag.
 
I don't share his ideology either.
But racist? Nope.

He doesn't like and is quick to mock anything that he perceives to be a hypochritical PC attitude -which, in the GB, happens to involve women and only two ethnic minority groups- . Although you're right - he sometimes says some things that are a bit far off.

But once you hang around for longer and notice his 1:1 interactions with those Litsters who belong to those particular minority groups, and once you remove the politics out of the discussions re ethnic groups: :
You'll see that he's cool with them, unless they're assholes or piss him off with something. And same goes for his attitude concerning white or asian posters.
 
Last edited:
I don't share his ideology either.
But racist? Nope.

He doesn't like and is quick to mock anything that he perceives to be a hypochritical PC attitude -which, in the GB, happens to involve women and only two ethnic minority groups- . Although you're right - he sometimes says some things that are a bit far off.

But once you hang around for longer and notice his 1:1 interactions with those Litsters who belong to those particular minority groups, and once you remove the politics out of the discussions re ethnic groups: :
You'll see that he's cool with them, unless they're assholes or piss him off with something. And same goes for his attitude concerning white or asian posters.

I think you have a racist problem with muslims too and, like him, don't see it as your problem.

It is your problem.

As is the bolded paragraph of your statement. You're paranoid and wrong.
 
Last edited:
I don't share his ideology either.
But racist? Nope.

He doesn't like and is quick to mock anything that he perceives to be a hypochritical PC attitude -which, in the GB, happens to involve women and only two ethnic minority groups- . Although you're right - he sometimes says some things that are a bit far off.

But once you hang around for longer and notice his 1:1 interactions with those Litsters who belong to those particular minority groups, and once you remove the politics out of the discussions re ethnic groups: :
You'll see that he's cool with them, unless they're assholes or piss him off with something. And same goes for his attitude concerning white or asian posters.


Hei, your JBJ is showing.

Geeze, you try and jump in the middle of underdog and Botany Boy with a pist that confirms you're a racist POS. Well done!

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

/////



I think you have a racist problem with muslims too and, like him, don't see it as your problem.

It is your problem.

As is the bolded paragraph of your statement. You're paranoid and wrong.


Yaaassss Jaysus! Preach it!


https://senyorbernat.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/20130412-173747.jpg?w=560
 
I think you have a racist problem with muslims too and, like him, don't see it as your problem.

It is your problem.

lol I don't.
I even slept with one (actually, only his father was muslim), and he was an awesome guy.
And he didn't have any problem that I have a bit of jewish in me either lol.

Don't take seriously some of the flaming that some of us are trying to pull here.
 
Back
Top