Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hitchens became a cheap Orientalist for the Israelis and the MIC. These are capitalists.

They are opposed to revolution or any form of progressivism or popular movements.

He was paid handsomely by their think tanks.

You've been conned by a con man.

Ahhh, I see. I think I quite understand you now, if not your point of view.

Sincerely sorry to have asked.

At risk of coming to (((their))) attention, just between you and I, I have heard that if you will apply a liner of aluminium to the interior of your chapeau, it quells (((their))) influence.
 
Ahhh, I see. I think I quite understand you now, if not your point of view.

Sincerely sorry to have asked.

At risk of coming to (((their))) attention, just between you and I, I have heard that if you will apply a liner of aluminium to the interior of your chapeau, it quells (((their))) influence.

Pathetic and cheap.

Go fuck yourself you pathetic coward.
 
Oh for goodness sake. Who was paying him in the last few years?

You think the AEI etc are fucking socialists?

Twit.

And the part where any publication that paid him a wage was avowedly socialist? And the part where AEI paid him to manufacture opinions they liked (when he often came out with stuff they weren't enthusiastic about?)

Oh, right, There isn't any. Not that you'll admit it, because you're a propagandistic hack.

Twat.

Twinkling in the Twins' Constellation,
Ellie
 
And the part where any publication that paid him a wage was avowedly socialist? And the part where AEI paid him to manufacture opinions they liked (or didn't often come out with stuff they weren't enthusiastic about?)

Oh, right, There isn't any. Not that you'll admit it, because you're a propagandistic hack.

Twat.

Twinkling in the Twins' Constellation,
Ellie

These think tanks serve one purpose and one purpose only. Profits for the ruling class.

If you think otherwise, you're a credulous fool.

But we already know that anyway.
 
That you are a less talented bigot, racist, islamophobe and warmonger isn't in question.

It isn't in question? I was quite unaware that my views were expressed, or indeed questioned.

You seem to have taken a couple of intellectual leaps to arrive at the above assessment so let me hurry and see if I can't catch up.

Am I to understand that you are of the view that my views must needs be in tandem with those I read? If true, that is indeed troubling. More so, if you could see the breadth of my wandering through the stacks.

Are there specific authors and works that you might recommend I concentrate my attentions toward in order to form "correct" opinions on these matters?
 
These think tanks serve one purpose and one purpose only. Profits for the ruling class.

If you think otherwise, you're a credulous fool.

But we already know that anyway.

You poor, poor thing. The credulous fool is the one who repeats assertions spoon-fed to him and has absolutely nothing in his sack to back it up when asked.

You're kinda sad. :(

Unless, of course, you have something to back up what you said. I'm an optimist, if anything. So, c'mon. Wow me with yer proofs n'stuff!

Pitying in Pittsburgh,
Ellie
 
You poor, poor thing. The credulous fool is the one who repeats assertions spoon-fed to him and has absolutely nothing in his sack to back it up when asked.

You're kinda sad. :(

Unless, of course, you have something to back up what you said. I'm an optimist, if anything. So, c'mon. Wow me with yer proofs n'stuff!

Pitying in Pittsburgh,
Ellie

I'm not repeating anything I've been fed.

Can you back that assertion up?

It's only fair. You can't demand that people back up their opinions and not do so.

Or are you a blatant hypocrite like most of the other right wing lunatics that post here?
 
Last edited:
Nope.

Hitchens propagated the clash of civilisations hoax.

You need to be a fool, a racist, an islamophobe and an Orientalist to be not repelled by that repellant bull shit.

That's odd. How did you answer so quickly before I had finished typing and had hit enter? Looks like you only saw the first bit since that was all the quote contained.

You must not have not noted my request for a suitible reading list?
 
I just realized with this sentence that you were contrasting my scribblings with Hitchens.

I think I can live with coming up short.

Fair enough. But you're probably still a bigot, a coward, an islamophobe and an Orientalist.
 
Would it be in any way okay if I were to reread Hitchens having a more critical eye with an idea towards being repulsed?

Is there perhaps a sanitized version that I could attain of his writings that would only be in accordance with proper thinking?
 
Would it be in any way okay if I were to reread Hitchens having a more critical eye with an idea towards being repulsed?

Is there perhaps a sanitized version that I could attain of his writings that would only be in accordance with proper thinking?

Oh fuck off.
 
Thanks ever so much. I shudder to think what might have happened to my intellectual and social development had I not run into you this fine day.

Fuck off, you pompous twat.

Edward Said had 1000 times the integrity of the scummy Hitchens.

Only a bigot would think otherwise.

You are racist scum.
 
Fuck off, you pompous twat.

Edward Said had 1000 times the integrity of the scummy Hitchens.

Only a bigot would think otherwise.

You are racist scum.

I'm coming around to the idea that perhaps you're having a bit of fun with me?

Not , you understand , that I'm saying that it is preposterous that one might prefer Said over Hitchens, I am quite sure on the basis of concurrence of opinion to theirs many people would prefer the former over the latter...depending on one's politics of course.

I just sense that perhaps I'm missing some nuance in what you're saying because the over-the-top reaction here can be nothing but sarcasm. I'm left puzzled as to whether you are a fan of Hitchens and having a bit of fun or whether you're not a fan of Hitchens and simply being overly strident to make some sort of point?
 
I'm coming around to the idea that perhaps you're having a bit of fun with me?

Not , you understand , that I'm saying that it is preposterous that one might prefer Said over Hitchens, I am quite sure on the basis of concurrence of opinion to theirs many people would prefer the former over the latter...depending on one's politics of course.

I just sense that perhaps I'm missing some nuance in what you're saying because the over-the-top reaction here can be nothing but sarcasm. I'm left puzzled as to whether you are a fan of Hitchens and having a bit of fun or whether you're not a fan of Hitchens and simply being overly strident to make some sort of point?

Hitchens was a rent boy for the zionists and the weapons manufacturers.

He appealed to racists.

Deal with it.
 
I'm not repeating anything I've been fed.

Can you back that assertion up?

It's only fair. You can't demand that people back up their opinions and not do so.

Or are you a blatant hypocrite like most of the other right wing lunatics that post here?

Dammit. You just broke my irony meter.

I demand reparations.

Justified in Jabalia,
Ellie
 
Dammit. You just broke my irony meter.

I demand reparations.

Justified in Jabalia,
Ellie



I thought you were British for some reason and actually might understand irony.

Clearly you're an American and don't do irony at all.
 
Hitchens was a rent boy for the zionists and the weapons manufacturers.

He appealed to racists.

Deal with it.

I believe this is about where I tripped over you, initially.

You seem to have rather firmly held beliefs.

By your leave, sir?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top