Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

[Que]

Land of the Free? Harvard Study Ranks America Worst in the West for Fair Elections


As if further proof could possibly be needed of the sorry state of the American electoral process, a new study just ranked the United States dead last in electoral integrity among established Western democracies.

Not possible. Ask any Democrat about voter fraud. There is absolutely no proof that voter fraud that we are not looking for and have no way to check for is occuring. Determining the identity and eligibility of Voters is racist.

 

[toubab]

USC/LA Times poll

http://cesrusc.org/election/

Trump 45.3

Clinton 43.3


Updated, finally.

 

[Adre]

New HRC ads are hard-hitting, hanging the Trumper with his own rope so to speak. Especially the "sacrifice" ad. I would advise Hillary to give him even more rope in the debates.

 

[phrodeau]

Not possible. Ask any Democrat about voter fraud. There is absolutely no proof that voter fraud that we are not looking for and have no way to check for is occuring. Determining the identity and eligibility of Voters is racist.

Terrorists are threatening to immediately impose Sharia Law in America, and the President will enable it within the remainder of his term.

But there's no way to defend against it, because there's no direct evidence that it's going to happen.

 

[eyerami]

New HRC ads are hard-hitting, hanging the Trumper with his own rope so to speak. Especially the "sacrifice" ad. I would advise Hillary to give him even more rope in the debates.

Conveying that advice through the GB to your favorite turd, Andre...

...because the email address you have for her isn't working anymore?

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif

 

[hashtag45]

him again .. .

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Not possible. Ask any Democrat about voter fraud. There is absolutely no proof that voter fraud that we are not looking for and have no way to check for is occuring. Determining the identity and eligibility of Voters is racist.

And that will be HILLaryous should they lose, how quickly the mantra becomes voter fraud and the lawsuits will ensue en masse!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

New HRC ads are hard-hitting, hanging the Trumper with his own rope so to speak. Especially the "sacrifice" ad. I would advise Hillary to give him even more rope in the debates.

She's pissing her money away.

Both of them have been known too well for too long.

Ask JEB! what all of his money and ads got him during the primary season...

 

[zipman]

Not possible. Ask any Democrat about voter fraud. There is absolutely no proof that voter fraud that we are not looking for and have no way to check for is occuring. Determining the identity and eligibility of Voters is racist.

LOL, you didn't read the article, did you?

Though voting ostensibly remains a right instead of a privilege, as highlighted by John Oliver recently, voter ID laws have drastically curtailed people’s ability to simply vote for the leader of their choosing under the guise of fighting (effectively nonexistent) voter fraud. Even further to the point, many states requiring IDs to vote have such wildly inaccurate voter records that many people end up turned away at the polls — in some cases, when their information hadn’t changed since the previous election.
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/land-free-ranks-dead-west-fair-elections/#LJhV48sa2OhdGuaT.99

The very laws you favor are one factor that drive down free and fair elections.

 

[underguy1]

Not possible. Ask any Democrat about voter fraud. There is absolutely no proof that voter fraud that we are not looking for and have no way to check for is occuring. Determining the identity and eligibility of Voters is racist.

There is zero evidence of widespread voter fraud.

There is overwhelming, unimpeachable evidence of systemic electoral fraud.

So called voter ID laws are part and parcel of the latter phenomenon. They are designed solely to inhibit the poor's ability to cast a ballot.

 

[toubab]

There is zero evidence of widespread voter fraud.

There is overwhelming, unimpeachable evidence of systemic electoral fraud.

So called voter ID laws are part and parcel of the latter phenomenon. They are designed solely to inhibit the poor's ability to cast a ballot.

We've had voter ID in Indiana for over a decade, and nobody seems to have a problem voting. The law was approved by the Supreme Court in 2008. Anybody who objects to voter ID, at least of the kind we have in this state, doesn't have a leg to stand on.

 

[underguy1]

We've had voter ID in Indiana for over a decade, and nobody seems to have a problem voting. The law was approved by the Supreme Court in 2008. Anybody who objects to voter ID, at least of the kind we have in this state, doesn't have a leg to stand on.

Without the proper auditing that most advanced countries have, it's hard to see that statement as reassuring.

 

[BotanyBoy]

So called voter ID laws are part and parcel of the latter phenomenon. They are designed solely to inhibit the poor's ability to cast a ballot.

I'm guessing you don't have any evidence of that

Without the proper auditing that most advanced countries have, it's hard to see that statement as reassuring.

Reassurance is irrelevant.

 

[phrodeau]

There is zero evidence of widespread voter fraud.

There is overwhelming, unimpeachable evidence of systemic electoral fraud.

So called voter ID laws are part and parcel of the latter phenomenon. They are designed solely to inhibit the poor's ability to cast a ballot.

If You’re Going to Accuse a Democratic Campaign of Election Theft, You Should Offer Some Evidence.

 

[underguy1]

If You’re Going to Accuse a Democratic Campaign of Election Theft, You Should Offer Some Evidence.

Fuck off you childish wanker.

 

[phrodeau]

Fuck off you childish wanker.

Back up your claim, anklebiter.

 

[underguy1]

Back up your claim, anklebiter.

Here you go, childish retarded freak.


Election Fraud: Response to Joshua Holland

 

[phrodeau]

Here you go, childish retarded freak.


Election Fraud: Response to Joshua Holland

There is nothing in that whole opinion piece to support your claim that "there is overwhelming, unimpeachable evidence of systemic electoral fraud." He doesn't even mention butterfly ballots, which in 2000 became the single most egregious example of attempted election fraud in recent history. Next to that, you've got some small discrepancies in exit polls compared to official results. There's nothing overwhelming or unimpeachable in that.

Now I'm done responding to you.

 

[underguy1]

There is nothing in that whole opinion piece to support your claim that "there is overwhelming, unimpeachable evidence of systemic electoral fraud." He doesn't even mention butterfly ballots, which in 2000 became the single most egregious example of attempted election fraud in recent history. Next to that, you've got some small discrepancies in exit polls compared to official results. There's nothing overwhelming or unimpeachable in that.

Now I'm done responding to you.

That's pretty much the response I expected from you, you pea brained moron.

You didn't bother to read it because it doesn't fit your confirmation bias.

You horrid little shill for war criminals, mass murder and islamophobia.

 

[underguy1]

Now I'm done responding to you.

You're about as honest as Joshua Holland is i.e. not at all.

I remember him lying and manipulating data at Alternet years ago.

 

[underguy1]

Wikileaks Proves Primary Was Rigged: DNC Undermined Democracy

 

[underguy1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53nL_aQe_ek

JAW-DROPPING Evidence Of Election Fraud & Media Blackout! #ExitPollGate

 

[snugglestruggle]

If You’re Going to Accuse a Democratic Campaign of Election Theft, You Should Offer Some Evidence.

That will be easy. You check the names of people who voted in Cook county against the names of the dead in the cemeteries'. There maybe no Daley running Chicago but nothings changed, the dead still vote!

 

[sr71plt]

That will be easy. You check the names of people who voted in Cook county against the names of the dead in the cemeteries'. There maybe no Daley running Chicago but nothings changed, the dead still vote!

That's not evidence. It's just your supposition. Citation on such a finding from recent elections would be evidence.

 

[BotanyBoy]

That will be easy. You check the names of people who voted in Cook county against the names of the dead in the cemeteries'. There maybe no Daley running Chicago but nothings changed, the dead still vote!

You're talking to Phro....you know damn well he'll never buy anything short of holy praise and recognizing the divine right of (D) to rule in all it's infinite wisdom, altruism and integrity will simply not be had by him.

(D) is perfection....(D) is god....or you're just a racist, sexist, xenophobic hater.