Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

[Aglaopheme]

Did I even point out the use of this instead of these? Oh no I did not. Too much irony for me to handle today.

 

[BotanyBoy]

If I was actually forced choose between Trump and Clinton there is no doubt in my mind that Trump is the lesser evil.

But as I am free to write in, and I live in a non battle ground state, my ex German Sheppard will be getting my vote post mortem.

Based upon what?

Until you actually solidify it with fact's it's nothing more than your unyielding loyalty to (R).

Just like the (D)'s who have no doubt in their mind made the HRC a noble, altruistic, saintly defender of the working class........because (D).

That's all any of you honestly have because they are both a couple of vile wretches and this election cycle is nothing more than a partisan shit flinging festival.

I'm not surprised that you seem to see nothing wrong with Trump losing a legal battle and being ordered to pay a settlement to a charity and rather than do that he used donations to his charity to pay his legal settlement. That is the definition of fraud.

Trump Foundation used other people's charitable donations as Donald's personal slush fund to pay off legal debts and to buy artwork for his collection. But It's "crooked Hillary"?

Yes it is, because no amount of shit from DJT or totally ignoring her past by the 1% wall street ass kissers like yourself negates the fact that HRC is a total shit bag.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

1 It's called self-dealing.

I know you don't understand this, but that is not a law.

2. What are the probabilities of someone hitting a hole in one that travels 150 feet in a hole that is only 139 feet?

The superintendent placed the pin to short and made the reinsurance invalid. There is no reason for them to do this on purpose as the insurance premium is paid up front. What exactly does this have to do with Trump?

Could you possibly be more retarded?

 

[Que]

I'm not surprised that you seem to see nothing wrong with Trump losing a legal battle and being ordered to pay a settlement to a charity and rather than do that he used donations to his charity to pay his legal settlement. That is the definition of fraud.

Trump Foundation used other people's charitable donations as Donald's personal slush fund to pay off legal debts and to buy artwork for his collection. But It's "crooked Hillary"?

You clearly don't have any idea of all of the elements required to prosecute a fraud case.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Wipe the floor with him?

LOL another delusional true believer in Saint Clinton the most altruistic and squeaky clean (D) candidate of all time!! HAHAHAHAHAAAAA~!!

All he has to do is get Mrs.Hothead pissed and he wins. She could win the same way, it's really just a matter of which troll causes the other a meltdown first wins.

Altruistic Saint clinton comes into play here? Does that mean if I think Dennis Rodman would rock Pope Francis in a game of HORSE that I think Rodman is a better person? Because that's what we're talking about here. A woman who has made her life of knowing policy (probably better than anybody else.) going up into a style of combat that she's familiar with against a man who MOSTLY coasted. Admittedly the man can surprise you when his backs up against the wall but I feel like this is someone getting pissed off because I thought CM Punk would lose in UFC, just like Brock did the first time (he whooped ass after that I'll admit.)

I expect HRC to have a bit of a tough time in the first debate and clean up the second two.

 

[Wrong Element]

I think the recent Trump gains are due to 3 things in no particular order-

1) Somebody has Trump reading the teleprompter most of the time, so as not to shoot himself in the foot. Roger Ailes?

2) Hillary's pneumonia. It's not about her health, it's an episode that underscores that you can't trust what she and her spokespeople say.

3) Hillary's "deplorables" comment undercuts all of that "she's one of us" branding. It comes across as generalizing, elitist, and prejudiced. It's also motivational to the opposition. It's one thing to criticize a candidate, but to criticize voters before an election is self-defeating.

If it's motivating to the opposition to have Clinton say that half of Trump's supporters are bigots, and his poll numbers go UP, that sounds like a sign that "half" was probably an understatement -- which I've been saying here all along.

 

[Que]

If it's motivating to the opposition to have Clinton say that half of Trump's supporters are bigots, and his poll numbers go UP, that sounds like a sign that "half" was probably an understatement -- which I've been saying here all along.

Brilliant reasononing.

So, if Trump were to say that "Half of Clinton's support comes from stupid cunts," and her poll numbers subsequently go up, it "proves" that the majority of her supporters are stupid cunts?

 

[Aglaopheme]

The superintendent placed the pin to short and made the reinsurance invalid. There is no reason for them to do this on purpose as the insurance premium is paid up front. What exactly does this have to do with Trump?

Could you possibly be more retarded?

Okie dokie, except that it absolutely is a law.


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/4941

It has to do with the fact that the gentleman sued and a settlement was reached. The settlement was not paid for by Trump or his golf club, but by his foundation. A foundation, as an aside, not even funded by Trump at all, but by donors making a charitable contributions.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

You clearly don't have any idea of all of the elements required to prosecute a fraud case.

You clearly have little else to do other than make excuses for Trump and his obvious misuse of donations to a non-profit charity to pay for legal penalties and fines incurred by his for profit businesses ($258,000 worth), to buy $30,000 in paintings of himself, to pay for advertising for his hotels, and to fund Citizen's United Foundation to the tune of $100,000 to help win a U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing greater funding in political campaigns by big-money donors and special interests.

Despite Vatican Assassin's insistence to the contrary, "Self dealing" is against the law.

 

[Disgustipated]

The superintendent placed the pin to short and made the reinsurance invalid. There is no reason for them to do this on purpose as the insurance premium is paid up front. What exactly does this have to do with Trump?

Could you possibly be more retarded?

Only if she was related to your father.

 

[xbb]

Because all of those things have worked so well. Unless someone comes up with something new, highly unlikely after decades of endless probes, that is all old news. Old news does not a meddle move. Sorry

Nigger, the Trump shit is 10 yrs old

STFU, about old news

We all get the agenda

NIGGER!

 

[Aglaopheme]

Only if she was related to your father.

Hey now! :caning:

Nigger, the Trump shit is 10 yrs old

STFU, about old news

We all get the agenda

NIGGER!

Yeah.....except this story just broke, and according to the Post there is more to come.

New York State has confirmed that they are going to look into these latest developments.

 

[xbb]

Hey now! :caning:



Yeah.....except this story just broke, and according to the Post there is more to come.

New York State has confirmed that they are going to look into these latest developments.[/QUOTE]

of course they are, NIGGER

they needa aid CoffinClinton

 

[xbb]

Clinton gave State Department appointments to 194 donors

hey, OLD NEWS!

lets talk FLAG POLE!

 

[Aglaopheme]

So it is perfectly okay for me to start the Aggie Foundation, to collect charitable contributions, and use those to pay my personal or bussniess exspenses with?

 

[xbb]

$6 BILLION missing from State when CoffinClinton is there

Yawn, OLD NEWS

Hey, What about a FLAG POLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Que]

You clearly have little else to do other than make excuses for Trump and his obvious misuse of donations to a non-profit charity to pay for legal penalties and fines incurred by his for profit businesses ($258,000 worth), to buy $30,000 in paintings of himself, to pay for advertising for his hotels, and to fund Citizen's United Foundation to the tune of $100,000 to help win a U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing greater funding in political campaigns by big-money donors and special interests.

Despite Vatican Assassin's insistence to the contrary, "Self dealing" is against the law.

<I> have little else to do?

Yet, you have time to "research" (regurgitate charges about) some business dealing of Trumps down to the last dollar amount that this figure entailed all in a vain attempt to construct a false equivalency to the morass that is the Clinton Foundation?

"Self" dealing is it? Both you and Aglo used the exact same term which means you were spoon-fed it off of some left-leaning hack Clinton apologist website. If not directly from a Clinton action alert email or some other such fodder.

Okay mr. Junior prosecutor you have at it. First thing you're going to have to do is you're going to have to pierce his multitude of corporate veils to even suggest what is his actual self.

This whole thing smacks of desperation which tickles me to no end. I have a hard time that the same idiotic electorate that would reelect the president with the worst post-recession recovery ever would not vote for more of the same but you do encourage me a bit.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Suck it up butter cup before you hurt yourself.

 

[Que]

So it is perfectly okay for me to start the Aggie Foundation, to collect charitable contributions, and use those to pay my personal or bussniess exspenses with?

If you have the Clintons accountants and tax lawyers- yes, it is perfectly acceptable. Of course you wouldn't want to tell the IRS that you personally are labeling them personal expenses.

You do realize that there's a reason that "charitible trusts" are a favorite vehicle for minimizing one's tax burden?



Where do you think Chelsea Clinton gets her millions of dollars in pocket money?

 

[Adre]

If you have the Clintons accountants and tax lawyers- yes, it is perfectly acceptable. Of course you wouldn't want to tell the IRS that you personally are labeling them personal expenses.

You do realize that there's a reason that "charitible trusts" are a favorite vehicle for minimizing one's tax burden?

Which in one case we can actually verify in that tax returns are available for our perusal. The "other" case not so much. Of course it's perfectly legal for him to prevent the electorate from seeing how much he makes, how much he donates, and how much tax he pays. Nothing wrong with that at all. No sirree.

 

[sr71plt]

Where do you think Chelsea Clinton gets her millions of dollars in pocket money?

Citation for that--what she has and where it came from? Or are you just going with the typical Trump Big Lie as a premise that the deplorables will just Pavlovian-style swallow?

Since you won't answer the question, I'm sure, I will. She earns big bucks--that's what happens when you are well connected, and I can readily understand why you don't make any bucks that way--yes, but it isn't "millions of dollars" and it isn't directly from her parents. Sounds to me that you're just jealous that you're a nobody and she isn't. (Jenna Bush works for NBC too. I'll have to go look up what they have paid her. Later: Oh look, Jenna Bush has accumulated over $2 million while working the same kinds of jobs Chelsea has. http://articlebio.com/jenna-bush-hager)

http://www.snopes.com/chelsea-clinton-made-900000-working-for-her-parents/

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

They all coincide with the poll slide. But I think that her health problems are way more serious than they're disclosing. The symptoms have been persistent and consistent for far too long now. What it is, I don't know. But it is serious.

Ishmael

The health, to me, is not the question. It is the continual recourse to every possible setback on the way to the White House: lie!

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

<I> have little else to do?

Yet, you have time to "research" (regurgitate charges about) some business dealing of Trumps down to the last dollar amount that this figure entailed all in a vain attempt to construct a false equivalency to the morass that is the Clinton Foundation?

"Self" dealing is it? Both you and Aglo used the exact same term which means you were spoon-fed it off of some left-leaning hack Clinton apologist website. If not directly from a Clinton action alert email or some other such fodder.

Okay mr. Junior prosecutor you have at it. First thing you're going to have to do is you're going to have to pierce his multitude of corporate veils to even suggest what is his actual self.

This whole thing smacks of desperation which tickles me to no end. I have a hard time that the same idiotic electorate that would reelect the president with the worst post-recession recovery ever would not vote for more of the same but you do encourage me a bit.

Self Dealing is a legal term, one of which Trump is very obviously guilty based on easily verifiable data regarding Trump foundation payouts to cover his for-profit companies legal fines and penalties, hotel advertising, portraits of himself, and this is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.

Speaking of desperation..
Your attempts to brush aside the tip of a corrupt iceberg that is Trump Foundation is almost as hilarious as the fabrications of a morass of corruption within the Clinton Foundation.

You've become a slightly more coherent DizzyBooby in the time I've spent mostly away. But still just as arrogantly disingenuous as ever.

 

[sr71plt]

It's looking more like Trump's need to run for president has been to outrun the law on his myriad illegal dealings. The "jail Hillary" movement increasingly becomes obvious as a smoke screen for him--as do a lot of the posts to this thread.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

It's looking more like Trump's need to run for president has been to outrun the law on his myriad illegal dealings. The "jail Hillary" movement increasingly becomes obvious as a smoke screen for him--as do a lot of the posts to this thread.

They both have done wrong.

Trump did it in the public sector where he can be prosecuted, sued civilly and be the subject of government/press scrutiny, which he is now undergoing. The Clinton family malfeasance came about in the public sector. Instead of protecting the little guy, especially in Arkansas, they sided with the people screwing the little guy and profited handsomely (cattle futures trading and Whitewater). That was just the springboard as they now are up for sale to the 1% and Wall Street. Donald was one of the people who used to purchase their governmental favors.

Yes., they are both excrement, but she and Bill are the bigger turds.

I'm voting third party, I don't have a dog in this fight.

That doesn't mean that I am going to buy into the false equivalency of "they all do it," because he hasn't done it while holding political office and enjoying the favorable press coverage that in the last week has twice edited her and his comments to make him look bad. I don't give a flying fucking shit as to anything he's done, I want to see the press and the Clintons punished for their symbiotic corruption. The press is supposed to be an impartial body, not an advocate.